Jamia masjid row: Bajrang Dal submits PIL to high court, demands to vacate mosque


Bengaluru, Nov 17 (IANS): Jamia Mosque row in Karnataka has come to the forefront with Bajarang Dal submitting a PIL in the High Court demanding to vacate it. The PIL claimed that there are proofs that the mosque was once a Hindu temple.

"There are traces of Hindu gods and temple structure in the Jamia Mosque of historical Srirangapatna town in Mandya district. Hence, the mosque should be vacated immediately and also, Hindu devotees should be allowed to take bath in the kalyani (traditional water body) located in the premises of the mosque," the petition stated.

Bajrang Dal activists have further demanded resurvey of the mosque on the lines of Gyanwapi masjid. The PIL was submitted on Wednesday by the state President of Bajrang Dal Manjunath. Including Manjunath, 108 devotees of Hanuman have petitioned.

The number 108 is considered as auspicious in Hindu tradition and hence, 108 devotees have become parties, Bajrang Dal sources explain.

The Bajrang Dal activists have also given proof of the Mysore Gazetteer, Hindu architecture in mosque, inscription of Hindu idols, the sacred water body and references of British officers to the court.

Earlier, Hindutva groups had sought nod from authorities to conduct prayers in the mosque. The issue had become a hot topic in the state.

The mosque authorities have already made several appeals to concerned authorities to protect the Jamia mosque from Hindu activists.

Jamia masjid also called as Masjid-i-Ala, is located inside the Srirangapatna fort. It was built in 1786-87, during the rule of Tipu. The mosque has three inscriptions that mention nine names of Prophet Mohammad.

Narendra Modi Vichar Manch had made submissions to authorities for survey of the mosque, and maintain that they strongly believe with evidence that Jamia masjid was built after razing down Hanuman temple.

 

 

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Nithin, Bangalore/SA

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    I am curious about you claim, can you share some references where i can get details to support your claim, some books , websites which has strong evidence to say kadri temple was a buddhist site,.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • Namoona, Germany

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    "Kadri is derived from Kadri Vihara which was a Buddhist monastery of Vajrayana cult. According to the Buddhist enumerator Kadarika means a hillside pastures land. The earliest reference to this place is in the epigraph dated A.D.968 engraved on the pedestal of the famous Lokeshwara image. In it is mentioned that King Kundavarma of the Alupa Dynasty installed the image in Kadarika Vihara. From this we can know that Kadarika is the earliest form of this place name. Vihara is the name given in Buddhlet settlement while Buddhism flourished here during 10th century A.D."

    DisAgree [3] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rita, Germany

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    Namoona Germany,well on this point you have full right to get down temple and build a Jain temple.According to these people .looks like no water to take bath anywhere around except in this area.Why all this making problems where peace was there.?Should one make problems and take bath in holy?water ?arent there enough temples in In India?Why demolish and build one temple?Again go ask money to build temple?

    DisAgree [3] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rolf, Dubai

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    Modi assures investors of Red Carpet sans Red Tapism; India to spend $ 100 trillion on infrastructure.

    DisAgree [15] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Namoona, Germany

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    Kadiri temple was originally built by Buddhist people. Now can I as Buddhist claim it back with 109 of my fellow people? Will courts allow survey of my claim?

    DisAgree [22] Agree [79] Reply Report Abuse

  • Harish, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    BD & VHP are inviting problems, Make this as a monument a tourist place .Let everybody come & worship according to their will.

    DisAgree [26] Agree [31] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rolf, Dubai

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    Dear Harish your suggestion is acceptable but need to mention in the entrance.Worshiping is allowed for people who worship the creator not for the people who worship the created

    DisAgree [9] Agree [52] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    Mr Rolf are you called by the number of cells in your body?. Though you are made of a billion cells yet you are called one Rolf right? similarly everything put together is God. If you read any religious book it tells us that God does not have any need. if there is no need why would he create?. this itself is proof that power is not outside but inside. If there really was a God why should we pray hem as it is unlikely to make him happy or satisfied.

    DisAgree [19] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed, Bangalore

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    Rajesh, what are you saying. When someone is talking about Fruit, you are talking about Vegetable. Animals will easily understand the concept of God than you being a human given superior brain but yet unable to differentiate Creator and Creation. There cannot be 2 PM in a country likewise there cannot be more than 1 God to entire universe. And please God is not substance or human here to compare with others. He is supreme to all and there is none like Him to get compared.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [16] Report Abuse

  • Manoj, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 17 2022

    Worshipping the creator includes circling cube,Bowing down before the cube and praying in front of it ??

    DisAgree [5] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Jamia masjid row: Bajrang Dal submits PIL to high court, demands to vacate mosque



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.