SC upholds omission of meat products in midday meals in Lakshadweep


New Delhi, September 14 (IANS): The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a decision of the Lakshadweep administration omitting meat and chicken from the menu of mid-day meals in schools and shutting down of dairy farms.

A bench comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M. Trivedi was considering a special leave petition filed by a resident of island against the decision of the Kerala High Court passed in September 2021 refusing to entertain a PIL against the change in mid-day meal’s menu.

The Supreme Court said that it is not within the court’s domain to decide the choice of food for children of a particular region and dismissed the plea on the ground that it merely questioned the policy decision without pointing out any legal breach.

In an interim direction passed in May last year, the top court had directed the Lakshadweep administration to continue including non-vegetarian food items in the mid-day meals for school children.

However, Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj, appearing for the Union Territory administration, was consistently pressing for vacation of the interim order saying that the exclusion and inclusion of items from the menu of the mid-day meal scheme should be best left to the government, being a policy matter.

He had argued that omitting meat and chicken from the menu of mid-day meals, and inclusion of fruits and dry fruits is perfectly in tune with the objectives of the mid-day meal scheme.

The law officer added that the nutritional requirements of children will be met by such modification, which is in keeping with the objectives of the mid-day meal guidelines.

“In Lakshadweep, meat and chicken are normally part of the regular menu in almost all families. On the other hand, consumption of fruits and dry fruits is very less among the islanders. Therefore, omitting meat and chicken from the menu of mid-day meals, and inclusion of fruits and dry fruits, is perfectly in tune with the objectives of the mid-day meal scheme," the UT administration had told the top court in its pleadings.

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • G SURESH, new delhi

    Thu, Sep 14 2023

    THE DECISION OF HE SUPREME COURT IS SOUND. THE LACCADIVES HAVE A READY SOURCE OF PROTEIN IN FISH. THE DIARY FARM MAINTAINED WAS VASTLY UNECONOMIC . IT IS NOT FOR THE COURT TO DECIDE WHAT SHOULD AND WHAT SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN TO CHILDREN AS LONG AS HAS THE NUTRITION VALUE. THE STAY GIVEN EARLIER WAS A COMPLETE TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: SC upholds omission of meat products in midday meals in Lakshadweep



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.