Govt mulls shield for retired babus in corruption cases


New Delhi, Sep 12 (PTI): An investigating agency may have to seek prior permission from the government before questioning a retired bureaucrat in a corruption case if proposed amendments in a Bill are accepted by Parliament.

The provisions aimed at protecting retired bureaucrats will come into effect only after Parliament gives its nod to the changes in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

At present, there is no legal provision for investigating agencies to seek prior permissions to quiz a former government employee.

The changes in the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2013, will have a bearing on Delhi Special Police Establishment Act which governs the functioning of CBI, introduced in the Rajya Sabha during the recently concluded Monsoon session.

Prior sanction of competent authority is proposed to safeguard public servants from the vexatious prosecution after their retirement or remittance of office in the bona fide omission or commission in the discharge of their official duty, the Bill says.

As per rules, probe agencies like CBI and others have to seek prior permission to launch investigation against an officer of the level of Joint Secretary and above.

The amended bill fixes a time-frame of three months for the government to decide on a probe agency's request seeking sanction for prosecution against government officials.
An additional one month may also be given in case the government needs to consult with Attorney General or Advocate General.

The Bill also seeks to criminalise 'bribe giver' by punishing any commercial organisations through its office bearers or representatives to imprisonment up to seven years and fine for bribing government officials.

"A commercial organisation shall be guilty of an offence and shall be punishable with fine, if any person associated with the commercial organisation offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to a public servant," the Bill says.

If found guilty, such persons responsible for commercial organisations can be given imprisonment for not less than three years and a maximum of seven years in addition to fine, it says.

No domestic law, at present, has provision to punish a bribe giver.

The Bill has provisions for forfeiture of property of corrupt public servants.

The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2008, to amend the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was first introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 19, 2008 and was passed by the Lok Sabha on December 23, 2008. However, the Bill had lapsed due to dissolution of the Fourteenth Lok Sabha.

The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2013, containing the provisions envisaged in the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2008, was introduced in Rajya Sabha on August 19 and referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice on August 23 for examination and to submit a report within three months.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • D Bhat, Mumbai

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    UPA/Congress has incorporated a culture of corruption and total lack of accountability. I dont know how BJP will do given their performance in Karnataka but it can' be worse. However, most readers of this site are supporters of UPA and anti-BJP regardless of how bad Congress are - maybe corruption is only issue if it is done by the BJP?

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • syed kazi, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    Bjp should oppose this bill till the end. Hope BJP will not vote for this bill

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Allen, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    Looks like the Govt is doing its best to protect corruption. After all they are also have to think about their peaceful retired life!

    DisAgree Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Indian, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    These all things are Congress gift to the nation, so they can loot.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • stan, dubai

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    Are u telling that whatever corruption, rape,land grabbing cases happening in Karnataka is gift of BJP rule?????

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Katapadi/Bangalore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    Better the government book the babus while they are in service instead of investigating after retirement.But in exceptional cases if inevitable then the government may not have any other ways than to bind the retired babu for investigation.Hope the government will take proper steps in this regard soon.Thanq.

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • S N BANGS, Thannirubhavi

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    Govt will shield Corrupt officials,So that they in turn shield corrupt Policians

    DisAgree Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • stan, dubai

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    Anybody is corrupt, than he is criminal but who protects and support the corrupt he is more criminal....

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • sddapur abdul raheman saheb, siddapur/karnataka/saudia

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    Oh.Al-Mighty...Very simple,amend all laws only to punish general public.

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • nagesh nayak, bangalore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    ITALIAN LED CONGRESS WILL BRING RULES TO SHIELD KIN AND KITH (DAA MAD) OF POLITICIANS to save their skin.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • stan, dubai

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    If it is ruled by BJP in the centre ,If this proposal comes they will also support this because all are supporting corrupt. When SC d Right to Information Act (RTI) for all political parties, all parties voted against it ( including BJP) . The reason is they also don’t want to disclose their wrong doing. So please don’t blame any party. All are corrupt and cheaters.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Murali, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    This govt really sucks !!!.Citizens should be sick of this rule

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • flavian dsouza , chik/banaglore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    No way this should be allowed. Anybody whether retired or not should be questionable during or after retirement. just few months before they retire they can amass huge wealth and get away with it !!!

    DisAgree Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • jacintha, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 13 2013

    The bribe giver should be punished first. This is the only way to arrest corruption. Through RTI, one can identify people who obtained favours ahead of others in que or obtained favours without fulfilling the required criteron.

    Retired or not, ill gotten wealth, has to be returned back to the public - put it back to the coffers. Unless this is done across the board and immeidiately, our nation will slide way below in all spheres of dignity.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Govt mulls shield for retired babus in corruption cases



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.