BBC banned programme on sexual attacks by its own TV personality


New York, Mar 7 (IANS): The British Broadcasting Corporation, whose “internal culture” was described as “rotten” by a prominent British politician, has a record of trying to cover up sexual attacks by its own employees, including canceling a TV programme on a BBC star personality who was a serial child rapist.

BBC canceled the investigative report exposing its popular presenter Jimmy Savile's predatory sexual attacks on scores of children that was scheduled to have been broadcast in December 2011 in the Newsnight programme.

Just last week a report by a panel investigating Savile's sexual crimes at one of the hospitals where he volunteered reported that he had attacked 60 people there, about half of them under 16 years, some as young as eight.

A report by the Metropolitan Police and the Britain's National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children said in 2013 that 214 criminal offences have been formally recorded in which Savile is a suspect and these took place from 1955 to 2009. Many of the abuses took place in 14 medical establishments.

British Members of Parliament have expressed concern over the BBC ignoring sexual abuses by its own employees.

The Guardian reported in 2012 that Labour MP Harriet Harman had asked what it was about the BBC and the hospitals where the abuses took place that had prevented people coming forward when Savile was alive.

And after the newspaper exposed allegations against BBC employees in 2013, Conservative politician Rob Wilson said, "For years the BBC's management allowed a culture to develop of turning a blind eye to sexual abuse and allowing powerful bullies to prosper.”

“The internal culture of the BBC was rotten and it remains to be seen whether it still is,” he added according to the newspaper. Wilson, an MP at that time, is now the Minister for Civil Society.

Later in 2013, Wilson accused the BBC Trust's chairman, Lord Patten, of displaying “chilling behaviour” when he tried to prevent Wilson from publishing the contents of an audio recording that brought into question a key aspect of an inquiry into the cancellation of the Newsnight programme, according to The Telegraph. The recording was of the inquiry head, Nick Pollard, which “reportedly undermines his own findings,” the newspaper said.

“Lord Patten’s threat to a democratically-elected Member of Parliament is almost reminiscent of something from the Soviet-era,” the Telegraph quoted Wilson. “It is chilling behaviour from the so-called public 'guardian' of this country’s dominant state broadcaster.”

BBC is funded by a government-imposed levy on all British households that watch broadcasts on television, regardless of whether they view BBC programmes or not.

In 2012 when his inquiry report was released, Pollard, a former Sky News head, said "The efforts to get to the truth behind the Savile story proved beyond the combined efforts of the senior management, legal department, corporate communications team and anyone else for well over a month."

The Guardian had obtained the information about the sex abuse of children and teens by BBC employees through a Freedom of Information request. It said that in the six months since October 2012, 20 BBC employees had faced 36 allegations of sex abuse of “an unknown number of victims under the age of 18.”

Citing the FoI request report, the Guardian said, “The complaints were among a total of 152 recent and historic allegations of sexual abuse against 81 BBC employees and freelancers, including 48 about Savile. Each of the complaints, involving adults and children, have been made to the BBC since October.”

The Guardian said that half the number of the accused were current members of BBC staff or contributors, as of May 30, 2013.

Reports of sex abuse by several BBC employees began to come out in the open after the accusations against the network star Savile became public even though BBC blacked out the Newsnight report.

In 2012, ITV ran a report of its own investigations into Savile's decades-long history of sexual attacks.

When the report of the review into Savile's attacks at the Stoke Mandeville Hospital in Aylesbury, about 65 kilometres from London, was released last week, Dr Androulla Johnstone, who led the inquiry, said, “The Investigation found that none of the informal complaints were either taken seriously or escalated to senior management.”

“Savile’s victims ranged in age from eight (to) 40 and almost half were under 16, with ten being under the age of 12,” Johnstone said in a press statement. “Around one-third of his attacks were against patients. Just over ninety per cent of the victims were female.”

Her statement added, “The sexual abuse ranged from inappropriate touching to rape.”

Calling Savile an “opportunistic predator,” her statement said, “Between 1972 and 1985, nine informal verbal reports were made about the abuse by his victims and in addition one formal complaint was made. ”

Another broader review of Savile's conduct and into “whether the culture and practices within the BBC during the years of Jimmy Savile’s employment enabled inappropriate sexual conduct to continue unchecked” is dragging on. It is headed by a Janet Smith, a former Court of Appeal judge .

On its web site the review, set up in 2012, said it had been in contact approximately 740 people till last September and more people were contacting it as of December. It expected to have a report ready early this year.

Pollard's inquiry report on the cancellation of the Newsnight expose of Savile said that BBC's top leadership was not involved in the decision.

The Telegraph reported, “However, it did not include testimony from Helen Boaden, the BBC's former Head of News. She alleged that Mark Thompson, the corporation's former director general, was aware of the content of the Newsnight investigation.”

“Despite her testimony Pollard's inquiry found that there was 'no evidence to doubt' Mr Thompson's version of events,” the newspaper said.

In Wilson's recording that BBC tried to suppress, the Telegraph said, “Pollard reportedly privately admits that he was wrong to overlook Miss Boaden's evidence” that Thompson knew about what the Newsnight investigation found.

Thompson is now the Chief Executive Officer of The New York Times.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Rita, Germany

    Sun, Mar 08 2015

    True,Itoo heard of this fellows "carrier"after his death slowly coming out.even they some People knew about it,had not dared to make it public ,because he was a Patron,loved by public as great man ,.About Publishing docu.from Nirbhaya,they should have asked permission from Indian govt first,and later make public.It is everywhere same.its like hiding own stankful sinns,and showing finger to the dust from others eyes.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shetty, Mangalore

    Sun, Mar 08 2015

    And our NDTV feels proud in presenting it.......Our mainstream english media still suffer from the colonial inferior mindset, where everything they do is accepted as truth & doesn't have the courage to question them....

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    Do we need to remind UK about their Prince Charles episode which was atrocious ...

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vantage Point, mangalore

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    Normally I dont trust bbc,cnn,fox news...etc..They are always involved in propaganda against other people and culture ..To speak frankly the last documentary of it was good...but I dontknow with what intention they aired it when their own backyard is filled with filth may be a propaganda tool...??
    Many of them maynot agree with my below statement but I want to state it when last gaza assault took place some of these channels were more concerned of Israels empty playground being attacked ...some of the rocket falling in mid of the desert ...while they tried to downplay hundreds of children killed by the opposite side...the large amount of destruction...they were more worried of other side...One channel I respect is Channel 4...it gives picture and news of either side without little bias may be gaza or ISIS or ukraine or srilanka or any extremism...

    DisAgree [9] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    covering of dirty linen in its backyard and exposing others- nirbahya case.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • vivek, herebile / abudhabi

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    if you are talking about that Documentary..nothing will change (who ever made it BBC or PPC)....until it show real Fact....every Indian must except something wrong within us...for such a huge case of RAPE happening!!..either weak LAW or our Culture ( so called - Indian CULTURE)..( human Psychology is that if we loose a Cricket Match we cry about Match Fixing)...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ashwin, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    I do not understand why this article pops up now. Two problems does not make it right. BBC's problem impact its employees and they need to improve their corporate governance. In India case it is a problem impacting 1.2Billion people, we need to fix our house. The documentary shows the mentality of how rape is treated in India. We treat martial rape as legal right to rape here, other countries do not, its a offence. Our rape laws include only certain assaults as rape, other countries have a very broad based definition of rape. Then we use stats like India has so many less rapes. We need to grow up, and look within ourselves, before we go blasting the whistle blowers. Please have a look at the documentary and then comment, there is nothing derogatory for the government of india, it just shows the mindset of all people involved, the victims family/friends, the convicts/family, judges, NGO's, lawyers, etc. We need to see this to understand what is wrong with our thinking.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Wilbur Bhaskar Porter, Cleveland USA

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    Let's have compassion for all victims of sexual abuse. These sexual attacks occur just as frequently in the UK and other so called "modern" societies in the west. They are just better at hiding their own crimes.Those of us who have lived in western society for many years understand this truth. It's another attempt by western media to portray India as a primitive and savage country. Their concern is not really for the victim.
    Wake up Indians! Some things have not changed. Their documentary is a continuation of British propaganda as embodied in Kipling's poem, "THE WHITE MAN'S BURDEN".

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Premnath Shetty, Bangalore

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    BBC is a hypo-critic organization.It avoids presentation of any documentaries of its own personalities.The best example was of Lady Diana's documentary on her personal life,made after her death was called off at the instance of the monarchy as it would harm their image.Similarly they did the same about a child rapist,again called off at the victims family request.They have picked up Nribaya as a case study only for eyeballs,going up to the extent of naming and showing the victims photograph,which has been banned by the supreme court.They have avoided doing a similar program me on their rape victims and perpetrators, numbered around 85000 over the past few years.years. That,s British, and we here appreciate and applaud their documentary.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mahendra Shetty, Mumbai Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    BBC IS HAVING HIDDEN AGENDA TO MAKE INDIA AND INDIAN PEOPLE DEFAME IN THE NAME OF RAPE MENTALITY....

    BUT IN THEIR OWN PLACE THERE IS SO MANY RAPES ARE HAPPENING BUT THEY ARE HIDING INFRONT OF THE PUBLIC....EVEN RACISM IS ALSO ONE OF THE BIG ISSUE...

    HERE WE HAVE SOME ZERO SENSE MENTALITY PEOPLE WHO IS PRAISING THE FILM AS THEY ARE THINKING IT IS A GOOD FILM..IT MAY BE A GOOD FILM BUT IT IS HARMING INDIA'S IMAGE INFRONT OF THE WORLD....

    DisAgree [8] Agree [32] Reply Report Abuse

  • Zeitgeist, Mangalore

    Sun, Mar 08 2015

    Shetty,

    Do you think India will have good image around the world with female Infanticide, women being tortured for dowry, women raped because they are out at night. BBC has just shown a inconvenient truth about Indian society on how women are viewed in India. there are some politicians who have rape charges against them and still they contest and win in election. But you still have to whine how India`s image has been tarnished.

    Being patriotic doesn't mean just waving flag and defending everything thats wrong with our society. We have to be patriotic by accepting that we as a society have flaws and we need to correct them.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh S, mangalore

    Sat, Mar 07 2015

    ..and they crying & demonizing indian Govt for not allowing airing of Nirbhaya rapist interview!!..NDTV is running debate after debate just to pressure Govt to release the interview & make things worse nationally & internationally..these unethical media houses can plant stories & uproot a whole nation..sick

    DisAgree [4] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vellano1, Mumbai

    Sun, Mar 08 2015

    These journalists are big perverts, everywhere! things never come out of their own media house.. either he will be asked to go on leave or just transferred to other media!... it happens in karnataka media, it happens in national media.. and it certainly happens in BBC/CNN too! all do coverups, but once in a while, they get caught, like Tarun Tejpal!...but yea, if there is a rape, they will be the first to reach there... not to stop, but with camera! its a SICK SOCIETY altogether! I have read so many stories about few of the prominent journalists, but can't write them! vhe vhe vhe

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: BBC banned programme on sexual attacks by its own TV personality



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.