Is Gujarat not a part of India? SC raps states ignoring key schemes


New Delhi, Feb 1 (PTI): The Supreme Court today came down heavily on certain states for not implementing welfare legislation National Food Security Act, saying that why a state like Gujarat is not implementing the law passed by Parliament.

"What is Parliament doing? Is Gujarat not a part of India? The Act says it extends to whole of India and Gujarat is not implementing it. Tomorrow somebody can say that it is not going to implement the CrPC, IPC and the Evidence Act," a bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur said.

The bench also asked the Centre to collect and collate information from drought-hit states on the status of welfare schemes like MGNREGA, National Food Security and mid-day meal.

It asked the Centre to filed the affidavit by February 10 and posted the matter for further hearing two days thereafter.

The apex court had on January 18 asked the Centre to give information about implementation of schemes under MGNREGA, Food Security Act and the mid-day meal schemes as to whether those affected were being provided the minimum required employment and food or not.

The bench was hearing a PIL which alleged that parts of states like Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Odisha, Jharkhand, Bihar, Haryana and Chattisgarh have been hit by drought and the authorities were not providing adequate relief.

The PIL, filed by NGO Swaraj Abhiyan run by persons like psephologist Yogendra Yadav, had sought implementation of the National Food Security Act which guarantees 5 kg of food grains per person per month. It also sought a direction to authorities that affected families be also given pulses and edible oils.

The plea had said that school-going children be also given milk and eggs under the mid-day meal scheme.

It had also sought adequate and timely compensation for crop loss and input subsidy for the next crop to the farmers affected by drought and subsidised cattle fodder for animals.

The PIL, filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan, had alleged that the Centre and states "have been highly negligent in performing their obligations, causing enormous damage to the lives of the people due to their inaction, which is in contravention of the rights guaranteed under Articles 21 and 14 of the Constitution of India".

The petition submitted that the drought has led to severe decline in farm employment available to the rural poor.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • MICHAEL NORONHA, Mysore

    Tue, Feb 02 2016

    NDA seems to promoting hatred by encouraging its governments in various states to flout central legalisations passed by UPA. Unfortunately the PM should learn and practice the rules of governance before making lofty speeches on "Maan ki Baat" and "chai pe charcha".

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vantage Point, mangalore

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    Signs of vibrating Gujarat....Somebody came to power by showing same Gujarat as model..

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    He transferred Gujarat HC Judges to SC hoping ...

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    Today Hajmola is SOLD OUT ...

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • JS,

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    want to show gujrat don't need such schemes.. let poor die or live

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • A. S. Mathew, U.S.A.

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    It seems like the Supreme Court needs special classes to teach them the unique status of Gujarat, as the State of the States.

    The State of Gujarat is not a State of India, but the sole imperialistic State of India. Whether they are far behind in healthcare and education, or to implement nation's laws like National Food Security Act-Lokayuktha etc, they are exempted and nobody has the right to question them because that location is the Jerusalem of India.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • shaan, udupi

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    THOUGH LATE NOW REALISED . GURJARAT IS BELONG TO FEKU

    DisAgree Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    O hell yeah, the scheme is going to Gujarat but made not to reach the poor and needy but Modi's gang. Now if they say it is implemented then Modi's net worth will be affected. As long it is there and not in Modi &Co. account.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Promenade Road,Fraze Town,B'lore 560005

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    Better Modi to answer this serious allegation raised against Gujarat by our highest court of the country.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • John, Udupi

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    Oh God! Doesn't the Supreme Court know that Gujarat is number one state in India!?. There are no poor people in the state, super fine roads, all have high paying jobs, and per capita is very high may be more than US and they have invested billions of dollars in US!. So why do they require poor people's schemes which is a insult to Gujarat and Modiji!?

    DisAgree [3] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    What about Lokayukt ...

    DisAgree [1] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Stan, Udupi/ Dubai

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    Fekugiri is exposed even in SC. Acche din will never come as a reality if they rule like this.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, Feb 01 2016

    Stan, only jeevan, madhu, Mahendra, j.anta, krish, Alfred, Alphonso, Vishal & Jamini believe in Acche Din ...

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Is Gujarat not a part of India? SC raps states ignoring key schemes



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.