Arms Act case: Salman Khan claims forest officials framed him


Jodhpur, Mar 10 (PTI): Pleading his innocence, actor Salman Khan today alleged that he has been framed by forest officials as he recorded his statement in a court here in an Arms Act case against him in connection with poaching of protected black bucks at Kankani village in October, 1998.

"I am innocent and have been framed by the forest officials," Khan said before the chief judicial magistrate.

Referring to a statement signed by him in which a witness Uday Raghvan had stated that he had brought the arms from Mumbai following directions from Khan, the actor claimed that he had signed the statement under pressure from forest officials.

At the start, Khan told the court "I am Indian and that is my caste".
The court has now fixed April 4 as the next date of hearing.

Additional Public Prosecutor Dinesh Tiwari said that the court has given Khan a chance to produce witnesses or evidence in support of his defence.

"If he does so, they will be examined in the court otherwise, the case will be listed for final arguments," said Tiwari.

In his statement, the 50-year-old actor refuted the allegations of two other witnesses, Shiv Charan Bohra, a forest official, and Pandat Vijay Narayan, Mumbai police Inspector).
Before this, Khan had appeared for recording of his statement on January 29, 2014 and April 29, 2015.

But as an undecided prosecution application surfaced and five prosecution witnesses were re-examied, Khan had to appear for the third time to give his statement.

A complaint was given to the police by forest department on October 15, 1998 claiming that the licences of arms, allegedly in possession of Khan during poaching of black bucks at Kankani village near here on 1-2 October, 1998, had expired.

Acting on the complaint, the Luni police had registered a case against Khan under sections 3/25 and 3/27 of Arms Act.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Frazer Town,B'lore

    Fri, Mar 11 2016

    HOW MANY YEARS THE COURT REQUIRE TO DISPOSE OF A CASE.THE JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Evans Christopher Sumitra, UDUPI/NEW YORK,USA.

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Salman is a lucky person as he can get out of any mess. His stars are good.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Our Indian judiciary system should be on flipkart so that anybody who can afford it could purchase it.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, Bangalore

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Under Feku Govt...
    Salman Khan even prove that He didn't acted in film " Hum Saat Saat Hai " and didn't went to Rajasthan for film shooting.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Santosh,

    Salman and marriage!
    Looks like he has only fun line on his palm. How many have been promised and how many still live in hope of ..... only time will prove.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rosario Fernandes, Kallianpur

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Thareek,Thareek,Thareek- the way his cases are being handled.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • India First, India

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    We should take our old sandals and should beat ourselves for expecting punishment for Malya, Salman, Lalit Modi Etc.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Santosh,K, Mangalore

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Salman Khan is innocent leave him to get marry afterwards he will be improved him self !!!!!!!!

    DisAgree [8] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Bhandarakar age shouldn't be a barrier. Always live with good spirit and young at Heart. (like me)
    Salman is only 50 and he is maintaining.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Everyday is not SUNDAY ...

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • R.Bhandarkar, Mangaluru

    Thu, Mar 10 2016


    1.Imbeg 50 Aaand...Marl Budthuji

    2. imbena Vishayaa namaa Oduvaa athaa!
    Nank Marllllllll...
    waa Karmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    DisAgree [5] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • PEDDU, MANGALURU

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    I PITY ON DEMOCRACY AND ITS HYPOCRISIES

    DisAgree [1] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • ren, Dubai

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Yeh Salman you right. I fully agree with you that you have been framed by forest officials. Actually the blackbuks or chinkaras committed suicide when they saw you aiming the gun at them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    DisAgree [5] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    The case has been going on since 1998! Why can't they wind up once for all. After all, it is the incident with poaching of protected black bucks.
    What a waste of time, affords, travelling up and down. Too much to tolerate.

    DisAgree Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Hussain, Abudhabi

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    One more clean chit on the way ...first u didn't drive land cruiser and now u were framed in this case ...all feku statements coming out in this regime !!!
    After all PATANG JO UDAAYA HAI SAATH MAY

    DisAgree [5] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rn, Mangalore

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Same like Afjal clean chit by secular groups!

    DisAgree [19] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Arms Act case: Salman Khan claims forest officials framed him



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.