Obscene acts in private place not offence under IPC sec 294: HC


Mumbai, Mar 19 (PTI): Quashing a case against 13 men who were arrested for allegedly indulging in obscene acts with women in a flat, the Bombay High Court has said any such action done in a private place is not a criminal offence under the Indian Penal Code.

A division bench of Justices N H Patil and A M Badar was hearing a petition recently filed by the men seeking quashing of the FIR registered against them by Andheri Police in December last year under IPC section 294 (anyone indulging in an obscene act in any public place or sings or utters any obscene songs or words in any public place causing annoyance to others).

According to police, on December 12, 2015, they received a complaint from a journalist about loud music emanating from a flat in the neighbourhood and that scantily dressed women were seen from the window dancing and men showering money at them.

On perusal of the complaint, the police raided the flat and found six scantily dressed women who were dancing and 13 men consuming liquor in the flat. All the men were taken into custody and an FIR was registered against them.

Petitioners' advocate Rajendra Shirodkar argued that the flat in question cannot be said to be a public place where anyone had access. The court accepted this argument and said, "Obscene act done in a private place or viewed in privacy is not covered by the provisions of section 294 of IPC. The flat in building owned by some private person meant for private use of such owner cannot be said to be a public place."

"Section 294 of IPC is meant for punishing persons indulging in obscene act in any public place causing annoyance to others. As such, the places where such obscene act is committed needs to be a public place and meant for use of public at large.

"Public must have free access to such place so as to call it a public place. The place where public have no right rather a lawful right to enter into, cannot be said to be a public place for invoking the penal provisions of section 294 of IPC," the court said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Frazer Town,B'lore

    Sun, Mar 20 2016

    This court decision is quite confusing .Anything obscene in any place is wrong and hope it is a crime.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • zeitgeist, mangalore

    Sun, Mar 20 2016

    Vincent,

    So what do you want? do you want police to knock down doors of private property to put people in jail on pretext of obscenity? eg: watching porn is considered obscene. so basically what you asking is that the police could get inside one`s home arrest the person for having/watching porn in his/her computer (if this is the case then most people would be behind bars) or just imagine a person roaming inside his house wearing only shorts getting arrested for obscenity. You may think the case mentioned in the article maybe obviously obscene and hence maybe treated that way,but law usually does not differentiate that way. If you ask for one law you get the various other laws that infringe upon individual rights.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • shankar, Mangalore

    Sun, Mar 20 2016

    Now DK police should stop interrupting intimate moments of consenting individuals in private rooms!
    BD can not raid homestays!!
    Haakodchanna enna birthday should not be heard again.

    DisAgree Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ronald D, Udupi

    Sun, Mar 20 2016

    This peeping Tom journo wants to peep into others bedroom...Judges are not allowing him access to free Po*n @ neighbors bed room! Dirty Journo!!

    DisAgree [2] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Charles D'Mello, Pangala

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    Why poke your nose through the neighbours window...!!!!????

    DisAgree [1] Agree [41] Reply Report Abuse

  • shankar, Mangalore

    Sun, Mar 20 2016

    Curiosity... to know if they doing things differently!!

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Langoolacharya., Belman/Washington,DC.

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    People,

    IPC should be amended IPC section 294 A should be added to make it offense to watch Obscenities in private homes...I would suggest 12 lashes for men and 10 lashes for women who participate in Obscenities and 24 lashes who peeps and watches like this moron Journalist complainant...

    ...JH...

    DisAgree [8] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Evans Christopher Sumitra, UDUPI/NEW YORK,USA.

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    No words to express as this is not an offence under sec 294:HC. So all make merry and enjoy in private place and do any obscene act.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • shankar, Mangalore

    Sun, Mar 20 2016

    Liquor consumption is not illegal. It doesn't mean that everyone should drink.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • R Mallar, Kasaragod/ Dubai

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    hmmm... They should close the windows at least! The journo who complained watched it from neighborhood right?

    DisAgree [2] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    Accordingly police have no right to enter any private room on the pretext of stopping or snooping to stop acts of normal acts adults indulge in too.
    Now will the immoral police stop following couples to detect or verify what they intend to do in a democratic Nation?

    DisAgree [3] Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    Dev, define Democracy ...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • geoffrey, hat hill

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    Culture vultures of Mangaluru have separate set of laws to facilitate access to easy money.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Lawence, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    Since the public place is defined by the HC, serving liquor without licence in marriage halls where public have no lawful right to enter will be legal? A question to Excise department.

    DisAgree Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • KGShenoy, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    As per law of land may be it is not illegal.But the important thing is that whether the family members of those 13 men (if married and if they have children)consider it as unlawful or normal.

    DisAgree [30] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • John, Udupi

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    KGShenoy, none of your business!

    DisAgree [2] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh Kotian, Udupi

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    The Police may have wanted money. The complaint may have been filed by a jealous / angry / frustrated neighbour. Simple !

    DisAgree [6] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Mar 19 2016

    Who will make these duffers UNDERSTAND ...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [46] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Obscene acts in private place not offence under IPC sec 294: HC



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.