Temple entry row: HC asks Maha govt to protect 'fundamental right' of women


Pune, Apr 1 (PTI): The Bombay High Court today directed Maharashtra government to take pro-active steps for ensuring compliance of law to prevent discrimination against women on entry to places of worship, saying "it is the fundamental right of a woman" and the government should protect it.

The court, which disposed of a PIL challenging the bar on entry of women in the sanctum sanctorum of Shani Shingnapur temple in the state's Ahmednagar district, said that it can only pass a general direction to the government and cannot go into individual and specific cases.

The Maharashtra government assured the High Court that it is completely against gender discrimination and the provisions of Maharashtra Hindu Place of Worship (Entry Authorisation) Act shall be scrupulously implemented.

"Secretary of Home Department, Maharashtra, will ensure due compliance and enforcement of the provisions of the Act, and in order to ensure that the policy and purpose of the Act is fully carried out, they (Home department) will issue directions to all superintendents of police and collectors in each district of Maharashtra," a division bench of Chief Justice D H Waghela and Justice M S Sonak said.

"The government shall take all necessary steps to implement the Act," it further said.
"Ultimately it is the fundamental right of a woman and the government's fundamental duty to protect their (women) right," Chief Justice Waghela said.

The state's acting Advocate General Rohit Deo, in a submission to the high court, said that a circular or a directive shall be issued to all district collectors and Superintendents of Police, making them aware of the provisions of the Act.

The accepted the government's statement.
The government's submission was made following high court's rap to the government on Wednesday on the issue, during the hearing of a PIL challenging the prohibition of entry of women in the Shani Shingnapur temple.

"The acting Advocate General has assured the court that the state government is against gender discrimination and keeping in view Articles 14, 15 and 25 of the Constitution. The government can take pro-active steps to ensure that the fundamental rights are fully realised and not allowed to be encroached upon by any authority," he observed.
The high court further said that it can only pass a general direction to the government and cannot go into individual and specific cases.

The court said if any person has any grievance that the Act is not being implemented, then he or she can approach local authority with their complaint.

Under the Maharashtra Hindu Place of Worship (Entry Authorisation) Act, 1956, if any temple or person prohibits any person from entering a temple then he or she faces a six-month imprisonment.

The acting AG, however, clarified to HC that if a temple in the state does not allow any person, irrespective of their gender, inside the sanctum sanctorum, then this Act and its provisions will not be of any help.

"However, if a temple allows men in the sanctum sanctorum but prohibits women, then this Act and its provisions can be used," Deo said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Sanjay, Mumbai

    Sat, Apr 02 2016

    MASTHAN MIYYA,
    SIRF TEMPLE ya SAB?

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Desi Jawan, Mangaluru

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Hope a day will come soon even women could perform pujas in temples, lead prayers in the mosques and say mass in the churches

    DisAgree [9] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • A. S. Mathew, U.S.A.

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Sir, there are hundreds of women Christian Priests all around the world, also Bishops in the non-Catholic Churches. Some of the founders of a few Christian denominations are women. The first witness who d the good news of the resurrection of JESUS was a woman. Some Christian hierarchy are opposed to the appointment of women in the Priestly post based on an argument that none of the 12 Apostles were women who went around the world to preach the gospel. How the women in those days can go around the world like men did? It was totally impossible. Now, we are living in a modern world of travel and communication, and if a woman is called for the ministry in a safer surrounding, they must be allowed to do so else that is contrary to the teaching of the Bible.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • sam, world

    Sat, Apr 02 2016

    @A. S. Mathew, U.S.A.
    - Our Lord Jesus Christ founded ONE Church with Men as Priests, not many heretical beliefs. The role of Women and Men are distinct. Those who challenge these roles, mock Our Lord Jesus Christ. This is one of the reasons why Pope Francis and the other Bishops who washed the feet of women committed an act of defiance and were admired by the World. God’s ways are not our ways. We are to follow God through the cross, not vice-versa.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • sam, world

    Sat, Apr 02 2016

    @A. S. Mathew, U.S.A.
    - Our Lord Jesus Christ founded ONE Church, not many
    - There were and continue to be many denominations that teach heresy. Fr. Luther wasnt the first and wont be the last.
    - Our Lord Jesus Christ instituted the Priesthood
    - If we do not have Priests, then God will raise up Priests and they will not be women because that role was given to men.
    - Men and women have different roles instituted by God and those who challenge those roles, mock Our Lord Jesus Christ.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Amin Bhoja, Patte / Riyadh

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Now our fight is in-between Man woman the 'GOD' and the Rights!!!!

    DisAgree [4] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • MASTHAN, DUB

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    ONE HAS TO BE IN CLEAN TO ENTER TEMPLES.

    DisAgree [11] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdul Rafiq, UCHILA

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Victory of Trupti Desai. Good move by the Mumbai HC and big slap on the face of saffron brigade who want to curb the freedom of women in this country.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • R.Bhandarkar, Mangaluru

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Now 'Shani Deva' has to listen the woes of women also at Shingnaapur!!
    Double Duty for him!!
    Now he can listen to both sides of the story.
    jai Jai shani Maharaj!!

    DisAgree [6] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev Kumar, Mangalore/Surat

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Do you mean Shani Deva not listened to women's prayer who visited the place. As we considered in each n every creature substance of god..why not allow womens in certain places..giving wrong excuses. God knows better than us. If wants to stop let him do so and not the assembled people.

    DisAgree Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Correct ...

    DisAgree [6] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev Kumar, Mangalore/Surat

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    Treat all of them equally.
    We will change the customs..latter god follows.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • R.Bhandarkar, Mangaluru

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    God follows only 'DEVOTEES'....
    Not protesters, nor custom makers, nor fundamentalists.
    Better know this 'funda' before uttering Nonsense.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Temple entry row: HC asks Maha govt to protect 'fundamental right' of women



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.