US federal court declines to reinstate Trump's travel ban


Washington, Feb 10 (PTI): A US federal appeals court has unanimously declined to reinstate Donald Trump's controversial executive order to temporarily ban refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim nations, prompting the President to call the judgement as a "political decision".

The judgement by a three-judge bench is seen as a major setback for the Trump Administration which argued that executive order was a major step to prevent entry of radical Islamic terrorists from entering the country.

Trump soon reacted to the court order in his tweet. "SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!" Trump wrote indicating that he is deeply disappointed on the decision of the San Francisco-based Ninth Court of Appeal.

The Trump Administration has reached out to the court asking it to lift the halt on the implementation of its executive order that was ordered by a federal court in Seattle after an appeal filed by the Washington State.

The San Francisco Court had held an oral hearing on the case early this week. The bench included Judges William C Canby Jr, Richard R Clifton, and Michelle T Friedland.

"We hold that the government has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of its appeal, nor has it shown that failure to enter a stay would cause irreparable injury, and we therefore deny its emergency motion for a stay," the judges said in an unanimous order.

"Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the Executive Order, the government has taken the position that we must not review its decision at all. We disagree," they wrote.

"In short, although courts owe considerable deference to the President's policy determinations with respect to immigration and national security, it is beyond question that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action," the judges said.

In a brief interaction with reporters after the judgement, Trump described this as a political decision. "It's a political decision, and we're going to see them in court. This is just a decision that came down, but we're going to win the case," Trump said according to NBC news.

However, his political opponents and rights activists celebrated the court verdict."The Constitution wins," said Indian-American Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, who was one of the leading Democratic lawmakers against Trump's executive order.

"This is an enormous victory for democracy and for families in our country and around the world. The justices unanimously rejected the idea that they should narrow the temporary restraining order based on geography or scope. They signalled that this executive order will likely be overturned in higher court," Jayapal said.

Jayapal said the US retains its place as a refuge for so many around the world."Given the court's ruling, I urge the President to abandon this failed executive order, and to spare the American people the expense and pain of continued litigation. Instead of stoking hate and xenophobia, he should be a president for all Americans," she said.

Trump ought to see the handwriting on the wall that his executive order is unconstitutional, said Senator Chares Schumer, Senate Minority Leader."He should abandon this proposal, roll up his sleeves and come up with a real, bipartisan plan to keep us safe," he said.

"The 9th Circuit's unanimous ruling is a victory for our Constitution and our fight against terrorism. National security experts have urgently warned us that the President's ban is not just immoral and unconstitutional, but downright dangerous," said Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader.

House Democratic Whip Steny H Hoyer said America's judicial system delivered a strong rebuke to the Trump Administration's unconstitutional Muslim ban. "With its unanimous 3-0 ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel rejected the Administration's attempts to subvert the values and highest ideals of our nation.

It also rejected a policy that threatens our national security and will hinder us in the war against ISIS and other purveyors of terror," he said. "This is a victory not only for the hundreds of thousands of people affected by the ban but a victory for everything America stands for as well. Now, it is incumbent upon the President to respect the independent judgment of our courts and abide by this decision. I urge him to withdraw this ban altogether," Hoyer said.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), welcomed the court's decision to maintain the freeze on President Trump's controversial "Muslim ban" executive order, which barred entry into the United States by refugees and citizens from seven Muslim-majority nations.

"We applaud this ruling as a reaffirmation of the strength and independence of our system of justice. This decision adds to the long list of federal judges - both Republican and Democratic appointees - who found reason to block this discriminatory order," said Nihad Awad, CAIR national executive director.

"If the President were serious about bringing our country together and keeping us safe, he would rescind this arbitrary and discriminatory order and recall what makes our country great," said Senator Patrick Leahy, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    Trump administration is smart enough not to call court Anti-National and asking it to go to Pakistan.

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • David Pais, Mangalore

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    donald trump has the guts to implement what he has promised. suppose any terrorist attacks in the u.s.a. blame the judges.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Victor, Mangalore

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    Mr. Trump has said that he would be seeing them in the court. Indeed,he is going to see them. The present celebration is soon going to end into mourning.wait and see.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    USA Courts are better than India ...

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • asak, saudi arabia

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    Thank god! Still there is country in the world where there is value for the real truth. Its amazing judgment.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • nazeer husain, jeddah KSA

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    THESE JUDGES HAVE THE REAL GUTS TO SPEAK AGAINST THE PRESIDENT. The judges must decide what is right and wrong without wearing any RAINCOAT. When allahabad highcourt spoaken about babri masjid case it was cleared that the courts gone through the fictions and believes rather than evidence due to wearing the same raincoat which our prime minister quoted recently in parliament.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • The Guru, Mangalore

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    nazeer husain, jeddah KSA

    Indian supreme court also spoke about Triple Talaq, what is your opinion on the same??? Now don't say Indian courts are not like USA and also don't say Indian supreme court runs as per Modi

    DisAgree [2] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nazeer husain, Jeddah saudi arabia

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    We always remember the resistance of tamilian public opposing ban on jallikattu where supreme court n prime minister step back passing even an ordinance.Triple talaq or any shariah issues only dealt by islamic schollars as depicted by the prophet.If four crore tamilians can loudly speak for sportive emotions then why not fifteen crore muslims can put some impact on authority for quranic cause.Better somebody ask what is the position of yashodha ben ?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shashi, Shirva

    Fri, Feb 10 2017

    Most of the American universities run on foreign students and it's revenue to state. Its better screen them thoroughly than completely banning

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: US federal court declines to reinstate Trump's travel ban



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.