Ayodhya dispute: Religious and political leaders express doubts on Sri Sri Ravishankar’s mediation


Daijiworld Media Network

New Delhi, Nov 16: Sri Sri Ravishankar, who on his own, has taken up the role of a mediator in the Ayodhya Babri Masjid dispute, will meet different stakeholders involved on November 16.

However, prominent Hindu seers on Wednesday have called Ravishankar’s efforts as ‘Nautanki’ (a hilarious play without any message).

All India Akhara Parishad president Mahant Narendra Giri told media persons that Ravishankar runs an NGO and is neither a saint nor a spiritual personality. He has no role to play in the dispute, he said.

"Where was he (Ravishankar) when we were jailed and suffered atrocities for fighting for the Ram Temple....now he has suddenly appeared on the scene," said Former BJP MP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Ram Vilas Vedanti and said Ravishankar should end his mediation efforts.

Various Muslim organizations have expressed their reservations, saying that the spiritual guru should first disclose his plan.

"It is being said that Sri Sri Ravishankar is talking to all the stakeholders in the case but he has not yet contacted the top leadership of the All India Muslims Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) which is leading the Muslim side," said AIMPLB general secretary Maulana Wali Rehmani.

"About 12 years ago, Sri Sri had made a similar move and had concluded that the disputed site be handed over to Hindus...what new formula he has found this time should be disclosed," he claimed.

Sri Sri Ravi Shankar met Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in Lucknow on Wednesday. In the “courtesy meeting” that lasted about 40 minutes at the CM’s residence, Ravi Shankar briefed Adityanath about his plan to bring a mutual consensus over the long-simmering debate.

Expressing hope that Ravi Shankar’s efforts might turn successful, Uttar Pradesh Governor Ram Naik, however, stressed that the decision by the Supreme Court would be final. “This (mediation) kind of effort is being made by those who believe it will help resolve the issue at the earliest. I wish their efforts bear fruit. But the apex court’s final verdict will be binding,” Naik said.

VHP spokesman Sharad Sharma ruled out the need for any kind of dialogue over the Ram Temple row saying that archaeological evidence in the matter was in favour of the Hindus and that the courts go by proof.

In a jibe against the spiritual guru, Sharma added, “Even those who have no contribution in the movement are leading the campaign for striking an agreement. The VHP respects Sri Sri Ravi Shankar but he should know that efforts in this regard in the past, in which prime ministers, governments, and Shankaracharya were also involved, failed to give any result.”

"I am hopeful... I am not disheartened. No one is opposed to amity. This is just a beginning, we will talk to all," Ravi Shankar had earlier told the media.

New Delhi: Sri Sri Ravishankar, who on his own, has taken up the role of a mediator in the Ayodhya Babri Masjid dispute, will meet different stakeholders involved on November 16.
However, prominent Hindu seers on Wednesday have called Ravishankar’s efforts as ‘Nautanki’ (a hilarious play without any message).
All India Akhara Parishad president Mahant Narendra Giri told media persons that Ravishankar runs an NGO and is neither a saint nor a spiritual personality. He has no role to play in the dispute, he said.

"Where was he (Ravishankar) when we were jailed and suffered atrocities for fighting for the Ram Temple....now he has suddenly appeared on the scene," said Former BJP MP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Ram Vilas Vedanti and said Ravishankar should end his mediation efforts.

Various Muslim organizations have expressed their reservations, saying that the spiritual guru should first disclose his plan.

"It is being said that Sri Sri Ravishankar is talking to all the stakeholders in the case but he has not yet contacted the top leadership of the All India Muslims Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) which is leading the Muslim side," said AIMPLB general secretary Maulana Wali Rehmani.

"About 12 years ago, Sri Sri had made a similar move and had concluded that the disputed site be handed over to Hindus...what new formula he has found this time should be disclosed," he claimed.

Sri Sri Ravi Shankar met Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in Lucknow on Wednesday. In the “courtesy meeting” that lasted about 40 minutes at the CM’s residence, Ravi Shankar briefed Adityanath about his plan to bring a mutual consensus over the long-simmering debate.

Expressing hope that Ravi Shankar’s efforts might turn successful, Uttar Pradesh Governor Ram Naik, however, stressed that the decision by the Supreme Court would be final. “This (mediation) kind of effort is being made by those who believe it will help resolve the issue at the earliest. I wish their efforts bear fruit. But the apex court’s final verdict will be binding,” Naik said.

VHP spokesman Sharad Sharma ruled out the need for any kind of dialogue over the Ram Temple row saying that archaeological evidence in the matter was in favour of the Hindus and that the courts go by proof.

In a jibe against the spiritual guru, Sharma added, “Even those who have no contribution in the movement are leading the campaign for striking an agreement. The VHP respects Sri Sri Ravi Shankar but he should know that efforts in this regard in the past, in which prime ministers, governments, and Shankaracharya were also involved, failed to give any result.”

"I am hopeful... I am not disheartened. No one is opposed to amity. This is just a beginning, we will talk to all," Ravi Shankar had earlier told the media.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • leslie, udupi

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    I said it before in my comment...
    I say it again and again...
    This swami will only waste time...
    Actual facts are with court...
    Let court decide and confirm...

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D, QC, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Advice to all commentators who bring in extraneous arguments. DO NOT BRING IN RELIGIOUS LEADERS INTO THE DISPUTE, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. DO NOT INVOLVE H.H. THE POPE, A SAINTLY MAN.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • KRPrabhu, Mangalore/Bangalore

    Fri, Nov 17 2017

    Let us not hurt others and get hurt....

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Delhi is suffering because Sri Sri Ravishankar destroyed banks of river Yamuna ...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dinesh, Dubai

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    we dont need mediaters ,we need Ram Mandir. jai Shri Ram.

    DisAgree [24] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jenifer, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Dinesh,

    You are in a land where people don't go to worship even once in their entire year of service. But you are no lesser devotee/worshiper yet. Do you still feel there was need to fill the minds of common man with animosity as the political leaders did in 1992 ? Do you have any idea of the loss India suffered due to what the Karsevaks did in Ayodhya on that day ? Did it in anyway help your parents, you or your children ?

    Peace gentleman, peace is what we want to live, not wrath ! One Mosque more or one temple less or vice-verca is the same for a common man. He does not become rich or poor by either of it.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, Udupi

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    SC should ban Pimps

    DisAgree [2] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    KRPrabhu, Mangalore /Bangalore

    Please do not generalize the situation by using the Popal office or name that hurts other Christian followers.
    You can use right words to retaliate but spare religious Head a community

    DisAgree [6] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • N.M, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Double Sri is a wolf in sheep's clothing. He is inclined towards Sanghies and doesn't seem to be a trustworthy person.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Who has appointed this sri sri swami to mediate in this issue. He simply keeps on bluffing like modi to gain cheap publicity..

    DisAgree [11] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • KRPrabhu, Mangalore /Bangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Shall we call your Pop Paul from Jerusalem...?

    DisAgree [22] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jenifer, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Why do you want the Pope or even self volunteered Shri Shri Ravishankar ? Where are Advani, MM Joshi, Uma Bharti ? Call them to face the present generation and let them convince the youth that the demolition was actually required and this is what they achieved by the act ! With a list of benefits of-course, that helped today's youth !

    Neither the Pope nor the followers of the organizations headed by the Pope are in anyway related to the grave you guys dug by yourselves !

    DisAgree [6] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Manoj Shetty, mlore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Fantastic

    DisAgree [2] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jenifer, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    KR Prabhu & Majoj Shetty,

    While suggesting and seconding, please give some exercise to your pinhead that the Pope is not in Jerusalem ? And Pope Paul is not the present Head of the faith ?

    DisAgree [3] Agree [15] Report Abuse

  • HENRY MiSQUITH, Bahrain

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Aasaram Bapu , Ram Rahim or Swami Nithya Nanda fantastic swamees to solve this issue.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Report Abuse

  • francis Lewis, Sastan / Bangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    he is fit for nothing. Let him pay the Money first for the Bank of Yumuna River first.

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Jeppu

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    NO GOATS WILL TRUST MEDIATION FROM FOX.....

    DisAgree [7] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri_elder, Karkala

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Let him try and have happy ending of building big ram temple... Jai Sri Ram..

    DisAgree [18] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Supreme Court is the Final Authority ...

    DisAgree [5] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ponkra, Dubai

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    This is India not Italy.........

    DisAgree [20] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jenifer, Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Ponkra,

    From Italy, a faith is directed in such efficiency that if the Head of the Church gives a call for all Christians to assemble at a specific location in every country for a purpose, you will be shocked to see oceans of people abiding by His advice. That us the charisma of the personality gracing a position and the trust the followers place on Him.

    Do you have one Hindu religious leader as powerful as that in India ? Each and every Seer or Swamy or Pandith pulls in their own way. First unite under a religious leader and then be guided by them. Poking fun at other unions is easy.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Karthik Karkera, Maryhill Mangalore

    Thu, Nov 16 2017

    Jennifer, that is the beauty of Hinduism you see, we don't believe in one god, one culture, one dress, one religious leader etc which is so narrow minded .Hinduism is polytheistic hence every person has the right to worship the almighty in a way which he is comfortable with, he can worship it as a male, female , or even transgender ( ardh nareshwar) he can worship his country, parents, teachers, elders , nature in the form of mountains forest, rivers, animals, the mother earth, etc there is no limit , so there can never be one swami who can control Hindus.

    DisAgree [13] Agree [5] Report Abuse

  • mahesh, Mangalore

    Fri, Nov 17 2017

    It only shows that you do not know the ethos of this country.
    we dont have one god. We can choose our own ways for liberation.This is the greatness of this land.

    DisAgree [1] Agree Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Ayodhya dispute: Religious and political leaders express doubts on Sri Sri Ravishankar’s mediation



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.