Mosque never existed at Lord Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya: Shankaracharya


Bhopal, Mar 19 (PTI): Dwarka Peeth Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati today claimed that a mosque had never existed at Lord Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya and that the structure demolished by right-wing activists in 1992 was a temple.

"A masjid never existed at Lord Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya," the Shankaracharya told reporters here on the Ram Temple-Babri Mosque dispute.

"Kar Sevaks demolished the temple, not a masjid," he claimed.

He said that a grand Ram Temple would be rebuilt at the site once a stay order given by court is vacated.

The Supreme Court is currently hearing the petitions in the politically-sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case.

The Shankaracharya also said that corruption poses a "real challenge" for the country.

Politicians, right from the level of village panchayat members, spend huge amounts of money on elections, he said.

"Even for registering a First Information Report, bribe is given to police," he said.

"When I speak against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, I am called a Congressman. I was a Congressman when the freedom struggle was on. Then only the Congress was fighting the British rule. Today, I am a religious leader," he said.

"I am a Shankaracharya. My duty is to safeguard the Sanatan Dharm," he said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • G M Hegde, Udupi

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    It is a very difficult situation. The holiest places of other religions is safe & secure in foriegn lands & they can visit once in their life time. But the holy place of Hindus is in this condition as we could not protect it against invaders. What if the Israelis or Americans or firangis had done the same in Persia, all hell wud hav broken lose.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vijay Benedict, Mangalore/Mumbai

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Yeah all right Swamiji. It did do not exist but later it was built by the new king in his regime. So cant we have an amicable solution and move forward rather than debating what has happened thousand year back. How about a mosque and a temple in the same compound. I was in Delhi last month and saw a temple and a mosque sharing the same wall. The locals of Ayodhya are least bothered as long as they are happy. Let us all be happy.

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'luru / Kwt

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    The mosque in question came into existence after 1526 when Babar invaded India. Swamiji, why are you distorting history?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • G R PRABHUJI, Mangalore

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Meaningless topic. There is no end. Discussing on this topic waste of time.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh S, MANGALORE

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    ..This Swamy is Congress supporter(no complaint, its individual right)..may be he want to help Congress which is now a days doing Temple run & embracing Hindutva..but in between Congress ditching a community which they brain washed for long..they no more talk about Godhra/Ishrat/Babri issues for sure..compare to Congress rule, during NDA Kashmir is peaceful..but the way Congress talking, blaming, leaders going to pakistan its very suspicious & just for politics they may ruin peace in valley..by the way, many may be forgot that during UPA MMS rule in just 6 days nearly 100 protesting Kashmiri died in firing..

    DisAgree [8] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • PEACELOVER, INDIA

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    The best decision would be to construct a world class university or a hightech hospital or a park which will benefit all people irrespective of cast creed and religion.
    The main issue is nothing but politics. Till 1980 most of the Indians did not even know that there is a disputed site like this. If we want to defeat this corrupt politicans, then we need to go for neutral
    decision like building of college, park or hospital.
    God is within us, we do not want to go to Ayoddya to pray. Muslims if you want Babri Masjid to be rebuilt, please try to pray 5 times in the mosque next to your house. Hindus too not following their scriptures, and the preaching of their avtars, if they do, they do not need a temple in Ayodhya to pray, God can hear you from the temple next to your house too.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Laks, Karkala

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Dear swamiji

    Please dont confuse the people , mosque or temple watever we are fedup now... last 25 years thier are so many statements came

    If u want to impress lord rama then tell the govermnent to contruct multi speciality hospital for poor people..this is best solution to make all hapoy including god

    DisAgree [1] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Show me the Temple ...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rahul, Mangalore

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Mosque never existed at Lord Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya: Shankaracharya.

    May be this is Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati 2nd birth.
    First birth before in BC.

    why these people giving these controversial statements i dont know because of money pouring in their account.

    or
    Needs to contest election in next general election in BJP ticket.

    Swamiji will one more stamenet after few days that right-wing activists who demolished this temple are mentally disabled due to this they demolished temple.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    History is the better clarification for these speculations

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • geoffrey, hat hill

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    "Kar Sevaks demolished the temple, not a masjid," he claimed.

    Destroy malthini dayeg? bethe bele iththija?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • peacelover, India

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Do you think Karsevak can demolish a strongly built mosque with hands, sticks and trishools. It was a planned demolition using dynamites with the approval of ruling government ( congress).

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • SJM, Mangalore

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Today you are 100% RSS - Pls do not think that people are blind.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • ca girishkk, m'lore/dxb

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Now the bigger question & confusion is...., The place of demolished Babri masjid or a disputed structure is not the birth place of Shri Lord Rama or those who demolished is nothing but the Shri Lord Ram's temple...!!!!!

    Need intellectual historians second best opinion ...., the fear is that..., this is exactly what happens when Politics is mixed in Religion....!!! at least FEKUISM should not hit our Sanatan Dharma...!!!!! Only Hindus can fight against the practioners & preachers of FEKU Hinduism..!!!

    second best opinion is most welcome..!!!!!!

    jh
    jai hind...,

    DisAgree [1] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sachin Shetty, Mangalore

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    We all know that mosques never existed in India till the Muslim invasion but the one demolished in 1992 was a mosque..

    DisAgree [6] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed K.C., Mangalore

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Trying to rewrite the history ???
    After some years this fellow also not existing in the world. So, can we say he never born ???

    DisAgree [8] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • RSRB, Kundapur/Singapur

    Mon, Mar 19 2018

    Ahmed K.C., Mangalore

    For you history means after muslims invaded India..
    But remember that your forefathers existed in India chanting "Ram Ram" before Muslims invaded India...

    DisAgree [8] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Mosque never existed at Lord Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya: Shankaracharya



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.