India calls Pakistan 'apologist for terrorists' as UN readies resolution against terror financing


United Nations, Mar 29 (PTI): In a veiled reference to Pakistan, India said countries that are "apologists for terrorists" will continue to provide "alibis" justifying their actions and inaction, as it called on the Security Council to ensure crucial sanctions measures against the UN proscribed terrorists and entities are strictly enforced.

The Security Council on Thursday unanimously adopted a resolution calling upon the Member States to step up efforts to combat and criminalise the financing of terrorists and their activities.

India welcomed the adoption of the resolution, describing it as a "milestone" in global efforts to set up a normative framework to criminalise terrorist financing.

India's Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Syed Akbaruddin, participating in the Security Council open debate on 'Preventing and Combating the Financing of Terrorism', said New Delhi specifically welcomes the recognition in the resolution of the essential role of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in setting global standards, especially in the context of preventing and combating money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing.

Akbaruddin, however, asserted that the Council "can and needs" to do a better job of overseeing the implementation of its resolutions relating to terrorist financing and of the various sanctions measures under the 1267 Al- Qaida and 1988 sanctions regimes.

India warned that "non-compliance of crucial sanctions measures in case of the UN proscribed terrorists and entities renders all of us, Member States, at high risk of facing challenges from these terrorist organisations who are well funded and armed despite international measures."

"As the saying goes, the proof of the pudding is in its eating, the utility of any council resolution will, therefore, be in its implementation," he said.

"Also, the unfortunate reality is that States who are apologists for terrorists will continue to provide alibis to justify their actions and inaction too, as was done by a serial offender earlier today," he said, a veiled reference to Pakistan.

Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN Maleeha Lodhi, in her statement during that debate, said that it is important that the FATF and the 1267 sanctions regimes are "not used as political tools by some to advance their geopolitical objectives."

She also made a reference to Jammu and Kashmir in her statement. Akbaruddin asserted that the international community needs to be determined to "continue evolving our toolbox and go by our rule book, rather than be distracted and stray from our determination. Our toolbox consisting of effective implementation of UN sanctions measures could assist in curtailing these activities in some measure."

Describing terrorism as a scourge that is tearing at the fabric of societies across the globe, Akbaruddin said it is a menace that is not quarantined to any region.

"People now live in fear of terrorist threats in countries across the world. Combating Terrorism is viewed by many States and their people as one of the most fundamental security policy priorities that require global responsiveness," he said, calling the adoption of the resolution an answer to "a felt need.

"The global community is impatient for action. The UN collectively needs to do more and do it much more effectively. For its part, India will be a willing partner in this endeavour," he said at the open debate convened by France under its Presidency of the Security Council for the month of March.

Akbaruddin further highlighted that many Council resolutions, including the various sanctions measures under the 1267 and 1988 sanctions regimes, where asset freeze is a core part of states' obligations call for regular reporting under these measures.

While welcoming the resolution's focus on ensuring full compliance with the measures imposed by the Security Council, Akbaruddin voiced concern that no effective action is taken on instances of reported non-compliance with the sanctions measures.

He pointed out that the report of the 1267 sanctions Monitoring team dated January 15, 2019 notes that Member States have reported to the Monitoring Team, on an ad hoc basis and a comprehensive review of frozen assets has not been undertaken.

He expressed hope that there will action on this front by member states.

"We welcome the Council and its various bodies taking note and rectifying instances of non-implementation to enhance awareness and effective implementation of the various council resolutions on Counter Terrorism.

We believe that this work could be strengthened with more cooperation between the FATF and the various UN entities" "Bodies such as the FATF have listed risks posed by Da'esh, Al- Qaida,?Jamaat-ud-Dawa, Falah-i-Insaniyat Foundation?, Lashkar-e-Taiba?,?Jaish-e-Mohammed?, Haqqani Network, and persons affiliated with the Taliban," he added.

By other terms of the resolution, all States shall in a manner consistent with their obligations under international law ensure that their laws and regulations make it possible to prosecute and penalise, as serious criminal offences, the provision or collection of funds, resources and services intended to be used for the benefit of terrorist organisations or individual terrorists.

The resolution also calls upon Member States to conduct financial investigations into terrorism-related cases and to more effectively investigate and prosecute cases of terrorist financing, applying criminal sanctions as appropriate.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Mohan Prabhu, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Fri, Mar 29 2019

    Whichever way the resolution goes, China will put a technical hold as it did in the earlier resolution to declare JeM as an international terror outfit; when this is done, the current resolution will not apply to JeM as it is not on the UN terror list. How can China let down its fellow traveller?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • SmR, Karkala

    Fri, Mar 29 2019

    Now Pakistan has got ammunition to fire bank thanks to PM Modi's government giving 'clean chit' to Samjota Express mastermind Swami Assemanada who confessed to his crime earlier to 'The Caravan' Magzine interview.
    In the blast, 70 people were killed in the ensuing fire and dozens more were injured. Of the 70 fatalities, Samjhauta Express bomb blast case which killed 68 people – 10 Indian and 43 Pakistan citizens. The victims also included some Indian civilians and three railway policemen.

    While acquitting the accused, including Swami Aseemanand, the judge noted that the prosecution withheld both the best evidence as well as key witnesses from the trial.

    The larger question this judgment raises is – what is the credibility of India’s investigation and prosecution system when a premier agency like the NIA behaves like this in high profile cases of ghastly terror attacks? And what signal is India sending to the world when it is building a global case for action against all kinds of terror?

    Finally, the most tell-tale sign of this government’s bias in the Samjhuata blast case is that the Union home minister Rajnath Singh made a public statement even before the full judgment was made public that “the prosecution may not appeal in a higher court”. This is shocking, to say the least.

    The larger question this judgment raises is – what is the credibility of India’s investigation and prosecution system when a premier agency like the NIA behaves like this in high profile cases of ghastly terror attacks? And what signal is India sending to the world when it is building a global case for action against all kinds of terror?

    With a Prosecutor Like the NIA siding with blast accuse prosecution “withheld” the “best evidence” which was not brought on record, eventually resulting in the acquittal of all the accused, Who Needs Defence?

    Jai Hind

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Mar 29 2019

    Hoping for a Favorable Judgement from UN ...

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: India calls Pakistan 'apologist for terrorists' as UN readies resolution against terror financing



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.