Latest


Withdraw Bharat Ratna from Rajiv Gandhi: Sirsa

  •   Thu, May 09 2019 08:40:36 PM

New Delhi, May 9 (IANS): Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (DSGMC) President Manjinder Singh Sirsa on Thursday said that keeping in view the findings of the Nanavati Commission, the government should withdraw Bharat Ratna from Rajiv Gandhi.

The Nanavati Commission found out that instructions to kill Sikhs after the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi came from her successor Rajiv Gandhi's office, a statement from Sirsa read.

"Indira Gandhi was assassinated on October 31 but no violence took place that day and very next day on November 1. But after Rajiv Gandhi took oath as Prime Minister he ordered his loyal workers Sajjan Kumar, H.K.L. Bhagat, Jagdish Tytler, Kamal Nath and others to avenge the killing of his mother," Sirsa said.

He said the government should withdraw Bharat Ratna from Rajiv Gandhi. The DSGMC President said a person who organises genocide cannot hold a Bharat Ratna.

Sirsa also accused then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi of threatening the police and judiciary in public speeches to keep them off the culprits.
  

Top Stories

Mangaluru: Luxury residential apartment ‘Divine Grace’ inaugurated

  •   7 hours ago    1

Comment on this article

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, May 10 2019

    This Idiot doesn't understand that Rajiv Gandhi is Dead ...

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Valerian Menezes, Kota

    Thu, May 09 2019

    Every one talks about his 'side' as very important. People do not care about rule of law. All should think. If 1984 is a genocide, 2002 is also a genocide. So many genocides happened in this country since 1947. Has any politician been punished? All have enjoyed their power and lived happily without concern for others. 1984 is also one such sad incident in this country.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Sms, Kundapura

    Thu, May 09 2019

    Sardarjee, if 1984 was a genocide, then what about 2002?
    Both side the poor innocent people had to sacrifice their lives.
    Difference between the above two cases, there is no proof of Rajiv Gandhi had taken revenge. But in the second case, complete evidence points a single person.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [31] Reply Report Abuse

  • JK, Udupi

    Fri, May 10 2019

    How do u tell in second case you have the full evidence?. I just want to remind you in second case Godhra attack happened on innocent people before 2002 riot happens. Don't try to twist the history for your convenience.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Withdraw Bharat Ratna from Rajiv Gandhi: Sirsa



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.

You might also like