This is how PC defended himself in CBI court


Delhi, Aug 22 (IANS): In an unusual move, former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram himself spoke in the CBI court and defended himself in the INX Media case.

A seasoned lawyer himself, Chidambaram said no question by the investigating agency was left unanswered by him.

He stated that no question was posed to him on the supposed illegal payment being made to him. During the court hearing, the prosecution said the investigation has revealed that a payment of $5 million was made by Indrani Mukherjea.

The former Finance Minister informed the court that the only question CBI asked him was whether he has an overseas bank account, to which he answered in the negative. However, Chidambaram answered in the affirmative to the CBI question about the existence of an overseas bank account of his son.

Chidambaram argued briefly, despite having a battery of lawyers such as Abhishek Singhvi and Kapil Sibal.

Prosecution lawyer and he Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta objected to the former FM arguing for himself. Mehta said Chidambaram should brief his counsel and speak through them. Taking a dig at Singhvi and Sibal, Mehta said Chidambaram should argue without any counsel if he doesn't feel them fit to do so.

Chidambaram is accused of granting clearance under the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) for INX Media when he was the Finance Minister during UPA, in exchange for alleged bribes paid to his son Karti Chidambaram. He was arrested on Wednesday night by the CBI. The court on Thursday gave four-day custody to CBI to question him in the case.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • ad, mangaluru

    Fri, Aug 23 2019

    True colour of BJP exposed by BJP in this case. While 30% are celebrating 70% of India watching the celebration . Is the beginning of the end of BJP power?

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdullah Amin, Pumpwell, Mangalore

    Fri, Aug 23 2019

    Phew, what a sympathy and what all repurcussions Mr innocent AD is fearing for BJP!!! He still believes that the utter corrupt thieves tell the truth even in the Curt!!!!

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Fri, Aug 23 2019

    More worried about the bakhs who are blind followers of a Non-Corrupt imaginary party.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohan Prabhu, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Fri, Aug 23 2019

    PC has made the prosecution lawyers look like monkeys - perhaps they are!

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Thu, Aug 22 2019

    A big fall forJodi - Modi Shah Government Next elections.

    DisAgree [11] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Thu, Aug 22 2019

    Looks like Tushar Mehta was scared (may be less competent) to argue directly with PC.

    DisAgree [12] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathan, Mangalore

    Thu, Aug 22 2019

    Ad
    It is slap on the face for "kalla ettu jodi" of lawyers representing the lone kalla ettu in this case
    Being a lawyer himself he should know that once he appoints some lawyers to argue on his behalf he himself can't argue in the court till he takes back the vakaltnama issued in favour of his lawyers.
    Either he feels the vakil fixed by him r not competent enough to argue or he himself feels better than those

    DisAgree [1] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Fri, Aug 23 2019

    Since the Judge allowed him to speak perhaps it is allowed for the "alleged" accused to speak up if the judge agrees. Rules are always just "Rules" for generality. For specific situations, as demanded, they can be changed. Period.,

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: This is how PC defended himself in CBI court



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.