India, China military-level talks over Ladakh standoff remain 'inconclusive'


BY SUMIT KUMAR SINGH

New Delhi, June 2 (IANS): Talks between India and China's military representatives on Tuesday to resolve the ongoing face-off in eastern Ladakh between the two countries remained inconclusive, government sources said.

A Division Commander-level meeting was held between Major General rank officers of the two sides on Tuesday afternoon to resolve the issue but in the end it remained "inconclusive", sources said.

Before talks began, Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General Y.K. Joshi also reached Ladakh to review the ground situation.

Now, since no major success was achieved during the meeting, another round of talks between Indian and Chinese military leaders will be held on June 6. Indian Army Chief General M.M. Naravane is confident enough that the stand-off would be resolved at military level talks, sources said.

Earlier, Indian Army and China's People's Liberation Army held several meetings to resolve the face off , however no breakthrough has taken place.

In the meantime, China has sent a large number of troops to the Line of Actual Control as reinforcements. Seeing this, Indian Army has also deployed forces accordingly.

There four places where there is an eyeball-to-eyeball situation since May 5 at Line of Actual Control. Both sides have deployed over 1,000 troops eyeball-to-eyeball at all four places. Further reinforcements have also been made.

Indian Army is keeping close watch in the Pangong Tso (lake) sector of eastern Ladakh and the Galwan Valley region where the Chinese have enhanced deployment. Other than Pangong Tso that is extremely sensitive the other places that are volatile in wake of the recent escalation are Trig Heights, Demchok and Chumar in Ladakh which forms western sector of the India-China frontier.

The trigger for the face-off was China's stiff opposition to India laying a key road in the Finger area around the Pangong Tso (lake) besides construction of another road connecting the Darbuk-Shayok-Daulat Beg Oldie road in Galwan Valley.

India and China have expressed that the matter would be resolved trough bilateral talks and both the countries are working upon it.

However, sources said, that the current standoff in Ladakh is not the usual patrolling face-off but part of the new combative strategy that was rolled out by China after Doklam.

In 2017, there was a 73-day stand-off between India and China at the India-China-Bhutan tri-junction at Doklam. China's road construction in Bhutanese territory was seen as an attempt to change the status quo by India and finally the road work had to be stopped by the Chinese.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, Jun 02 2020

    We need a PM like Indira Gandhi ...

    DisAgree [8] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Veer, Nagpur

    Tue, Jun 02 2020

    China doesn't care for Red Eyed, 56" Chested Chowkidar??????????.....I thought that we had one defence minister called Sri Rajnath Singh is not heard of nor seen during this face off with China. So, who is heading talks with China besides army personnel??.?.????....

    DisAgree [6] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: India, China military-level talks over Ladakh standoff remain 'inconclusive'



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.