Puttur: Row over inclusion of DC's name - HC orders reprinting of invitations


Daijiworld Media Network - Puttur (SP)

Puttur, Mar 30: The high court of Karnataka has ordered for reprinting of invitations for the annual festival of Lord Mahalingeshwara temple here, without including the name of the deputy commissioner (DC) of the district.

The high court also restrained Dakshina Kannada district deputy commissioner (DC), A B Ibrahim, from taking part in the festival and performing religious rituals there. 
 
Devotees of the above temple had objected to the inclusion of the name of the DC in the temple invitation, which they had said violates laws governing temple administration. 

The state government had said that the DC was in charge of the the muzrai department under Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Chairtable Endowments Act in Dakshina Kannada and that the DC's name appears in pursuance of protocol. DC Ibrahim himself had clarified that the very next day of his taking over charge as the DC here, additional deputy commissioner of the district was handed over power as deputy commissioner of the muzrai department for the purpose of the said law.

A division bench of the HC comprising Chief Justice S K Mukherjee and Justice Ravi Malimath, which took up a public interest litigation filed by Sri Mahalingeshwara Devara Bhakta Samiti and Bhujanga Gowda, has now upheld their petition. Various religious rituals connected with the annual car festival of the temple are scheduled to be organized between April 10 and 20.

During the proceedings, advocate general of the state, Madhusudan R Nayak, concurred that persons other than Hindus cannot be appointed as administrators for Hindu temples, and as such, it would not be appropriate for the DC, A B Ibrahim, to take part in car festival, which was accepted by the high court.

At the same time, the single judge bench presided over by Justice A S Bopanna, which took up petition filed by Naveen Kulal of Vishwa Hindu Parishat, objecting to the invitation for the car festival having been issued in the name of the DC, disposed off the petition by ordering to reprint and distribute the invitations without the name of the DC.

Right-wing groups like VHP had condemned the inclusion of the DC's name in the temple invitation, stating that it was a violation of the law, and warned of holding protests. MLA Shankuntala Shetty too had raised objections, only to retract later. Special prayers were held by devotees and locals in the temple premises for a favourable court decision.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Ashwin, SuratKal

    Fri, Apr 01 2016

    @hemanth, Bangalore:you asked "why there is religious conversion?" To get the answer, just search in youtube and you will find the answer, why are you worrying too much here in this forum?

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • FRANK, MANGALORE

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    DC SIR YOU ARE WELCOME TO OUR CHURCHES...ANY DAY...BE IT SUNDAY OF FEAST DAY....(TOLERANCE A WORD ALL SHOULD KNOW)

    DisAgree [10] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh Poojary, Mulki

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    Was the DC Mr.A.B.Ibrahim responsible for the printing of the invitation with his name and its distribution ? Blame those responsible for printing it. Please do not get the DC involved into this controversy and if there arises a law and order problem do not inform the DC or SP. Let the Temple itself solve the problem. Am I right ? If not please correct me.

    DisAgree [11] Agree [45] Reply Report Abuse

  • PAM Suvarna, Karla

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    You are exactly correct bro

    DisAgree [5] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Harish Salian, Udupi / Dubai

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    Mr. Poojary, you are absolutely right. If there is a law and order problem please do not inform the DC or SP. Let the same devotees or the Temple management solve the law and order problem.

    The DC is not desperate for an invitation card and he has better things to do I guess.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Udupi

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    If the law and order problem is not taken care by the authorities, why then the income from temple taken to exchequer? do you even know the amount of money from hindu temple goes to govt and in turn spent on welfare of oters? it is easy to escape responsibility , but do you ignore the income? come on

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    DC Saheb re...

    Nammora jatre ge dodda manusu madi banni....

    DisAgree [25] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramakrishna Adappa, Mangalore

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    ದೊಡ್ಡ ಮನಸ್ಸು ಇಲ್ಲದ ಕೇಸರಿ ಪಡೆಗಳ ಮುಷ್ಟಿಗೆ ಹೋಗಿರುವ ಜಾತ್ರೆಗೆ ಬೇರೆಯವರು ದೊಡ್ಡ ಮನಸ್ಸು ಮಾಡಿ ಬರಲು ಹೇಗೆ ಸಾಧ್ಯ.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • JTB, Bangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    A host has to perform a lot of rituals which include worshiping the idol. Will the DC be able to do so with utmost sincerity and devotion. Is he not barred by his religion/belief from idol worship?

    DisAgree [4] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • L K Monu Borkala, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    right judgement at the right time.
    Salute to the high court order.
    Should not do politics in Religion.
    Should not hit the Sentiments of People.Thank you Bopanna Sir

    DisAgree [16] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vantage Point, mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    No Kiri kiri...now go to masjid....I hope there isn't someone preventing you...marali manege

    DisAgree [14] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • JayaPrakash Shetty, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Many people are confused. The issue is not regarding DC being invited. Nobody has issue with that. The problem was DC was inviting others. His name was printed as if he is head of temple and inviting everyone for the function. People need to understand the difference. As per law only a Hindu officer can head the temple committee. So law was broken and unfortunately rather than admitting it people were justifying in name of secularism.

    DisAgree [17] Agree [78] Reply Report Abuse

  • YATHEESH SHETTY, PUTTUR

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    PLease follow the rules of the land, dont pain anyones sentiments,

    at last good thing happened.

    DisAgree [26] Agree [54] Reply Report Abuse

  • nazeer Husain, jeddah saudi Arabi

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    perfectly right.imaam saab has to look his own business logically who has nothing to do with janmashtami.Will secularism not survive in just following what we believe?.We should not become an example of confused believer by crossing the boundaries of any faith as govt officials or ruler.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [56] Reply Report Abuse

  • Lawyer, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    It is not the issue if a non Hindu can attend a temple function. The issue is if a non Hindu can be a 'host'. DC's name was printed as a host which obviously is not correct. Judgment as per law.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [57] Reply Report Abuse

  • chethan, bangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    No politics.....:)

    DisAgree [3] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • shankar, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    If DC had voluntarily asked the temple authorities to remove his name from the cards in the beginning, he could have saved his face!!
    Instead he cried intolerance, reducing all our respect for him!

    DisAgree [40] Agree [62] Reply Report Abuse

  • J.F.D SOUZA, ATTAVAR,MANGALURU

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    This should have been done earlier to avoid disputes. Now again to print invitations - double expenditure.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    There is One God,
    You find him in Temple, Church, Masjid or Anywhere.
    Praise the Almighty ...

    DisAgree [47] Agree [57] Reply Report Abuse

  • vasanth, mulki

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    in such a case, why the govt interfere in Hindu temple only. why the govt taking money from the temple only?

    DisAgree [23] Agree [59] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    vasanth, even Government knows where temple money disappears ...

    DisAgree [17] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • hemanth, Bangalore

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    Yes it goes to freebies for minorities. If there is one God why there is religious conversion?

    DisAgree [4] Agree [9] Report Abuse

  • Mark Dcruz, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Because Christians or Muslims don't pour money in the worship place, They have made it commercial. The amount of money is pour in the temples are in millions. Pls stop doing that..

    DisAgree [12] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    vasant, do you know Baliga ...

    DisAgree [9] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • vasanth, mulki

    Thu, Mar 31 2016

    jossey you need not to taught me about the where the money goes or Baliga case. everywhere such kind of things are happening. but you are highlighting the selected incidents.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Report Abuse

  • RSRB, Kundapura / Singapore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Don't forget to say Congrats to Sangha Pariwar, who won the case here in High Court...:-)

    DisAgree [24] Agree [52] Reply Report Abuse

  • Alphonso Rodrigues, Udupi

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Now that the court has decided, all related parties should accept this and close the case without any debate.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [47] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri, Karkala

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Anti Hindu siddu govt. is responsible for all this mess. First they celebrated jayanthis. Now playing with sentiments. Reprinting invitation is such a small issue or if government gives small add in daily newspaper it would be enough. Look at their ego. Really thick skinned people!

    DisAgree [35] Agree [54] Reply Report Abuse

  • juliana, udupi

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    If DC name against rituals, there is no need for attending. Why go there and get insult? He is the first administrator of the district.

    DisAgree [21] Agree [35] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mahendra Shetty, Mumbai Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    GOOD DECISION BY HONOURABLE COURT....

    THE CURRENT CHOR GOVERNMENT WANT MINORITY NAME IN ALL FUNCTION TO POLITICISE AND GET INDIRECT BENEFIT. ...

    INDEED IT IS A SATYAMEVA JAYATE!!!

    DisAgree [64] Agree [54] Reply Report Abuse

  • V V , BAJPE/BAHRAIN

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Don't play with publics sentiments for vote bank politics..This is a strong message for opportunist politicians!!!!

    DisAgree [15] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • Suleman Beary, Udupi

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Who is going to blow "Vadya" here? and supply "Kadoni"?

    DisAgree [20] Agree [38] Reply Report Abuse

  • Hamad, Haleangadi

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Look at his position not religion....It means CM or other government officer (state/central) can not attend other Religion function...

    DisAgree [29] Agree [45] Reply Report Abuse

  • JOY CASTELINO, MOODUBELLE/DUBAI

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Can somebody explain this is the first time festival is celebrating this temple or earlier years also held??. If earlier years also held, then whose name was printed??. Why this year only this is confusion????

    DisAgree [12] Agree [62] Reply Report Abuse

  • Zahoor Ahmed, Karkala

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    This time RSS has no other issue, so they created this issue for divide the society.

    DisAgree [68] Agree [59] Reply Report Abuse

  • perchu, pervaje

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    this is not correct. please recall recent fatwa issued.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • India First, India

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Judge has given judgement based on existing law which does not permit a non Hindu to perform temple rituals........ ! But its a wrong law which need to be amended soon.... ! D C Ibrahim should attend the temple ritual even though his name will be removed from invitation. If he attend he will win many hearts.

    DisAgree [28] Agree [46] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh, Bantwal

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    But it should applicable to all temple masjid draga church festival irrespective religion any DC like he may be Hindu Muslim Christian Sikh Jain

    DisAgree [3] Agree [35] Reply Report Abuse

  • vasanth, mulki

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    then, the same should also applicable to musjid, church... why only the hindu temples are controlled by govt. why the money of the temples being used by govt. in this year budget there is no money was allotted to temples but crores of money given to other religion. in such a case how can the govt justify this issue.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • India First, India

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    vasanth, mulki,

    I will be happy if same law applies to all. But being a Hindu I want first my religion to be most peaceful and clean. If we bring reforms and change ourselves first, then others will also learn and they will change too.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • ramesh, bantwal

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    yes thats what i mean to say let every thing comes under DC accrose the karnataka let we be united

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • shuba, mumbai

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    It is temple authorities who have to
    decide in continuing their part of devotion as per their culture.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • VM, Moodbidri

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Law of the Land is upheld. Nobody should take credit, or nobody should get dejected.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • The Guru, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    In this case DC went against the law of the land. The order vindicates the stand of lakhs of devotees of this temple..

    DisAgree [38] Agree [46] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Good decision by the HC.

    Importance also goes towards performing religious ceremonies, rituals and traditions of certain religion.
    Persons identity or administrative power next.
    Let all parties be happy and continue with better understandings.
    In this incident, no pain but more gain.
    This is a reminder involving all other religions.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [42] Reply Report Abuse

  • Hussain, Abudhabi

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Undu ragaley ijji

    DisAgree [6] Agree [66] Reply Report Abuse

  • PAM Suvarna, Karla

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Ok matter ends no problem, but same time please don't print name of any other religious people too including Jain officers or leaders.

    DisAgree [25] Agree [46] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr.S.Kamath, Mumbai

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    As per constitution Jainism and Budhism are considered as susects of Hindu religion.

    DisAgree [38] Agree [56] Reply Report Abuse

  • PAM Suvarna, Karla

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Thank you Kamath sir for elaboration.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • mann, bengaluru

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Pam
    U do your own search and find on Jainism and Buddhism,
    Then thank profusely Dr, Kamath sir.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Report Abuse

  • Zahoor Ahmed, Karkala

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Then how they comes under minority group??

    DisAgree [15] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • Alphonso Rodrigues, Udupi

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Zahoor, Minority is term coined by Congress for Vote bank politics. I know it is sad, but thats the fact.

    DisAgree [20] Agree [37] Report Abuse

  • Harsha, BCRoad

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    How the other so called minority group came under minority this is also came like that. What a question?

    DisAgree [6] Agree [12] Report Abuse

  • Veerappa D N , Madikeri

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Dr. Kamath please note that Buddhism is never accepted as Sub-sect of Hinduism.
    In fact Buddhism is an independent Religion even though it is born in India. That is why Dr. Ambedkar said that- "I am born as a Hindu but I will never die as a Hindu".
    When the father of Indian Constitution Dr. Ambedkar himself has said that he will not die as Hindu, it clearly means that Buddhism is altogether a different religion and not a part of Hinduism.
    Even Jainism was founded by Thirthankaras who rebelled against Vaidik Religion.

    DisAgree [15] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shaan, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Good decision honorable High court. Satya meva jayathe. finally won law,satya & Dharma

    DisAgree [26] Agree [50] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    satyamev jayate......
    satyamev jayate......
    satyamev jayate......

    DisAgree [87] Agree [65] Reply Report Abuse

  • Concerned1, bengaluru

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    !!!
    ????


    @ Jeevan, M'luru

    DisAgree [20] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed Ilyas Byndoor/Dubai.U.A.E, Byndoor/Dubai.U.A.E

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    Special prayers were held by devotees and locals in the temple premises for a favourable court decision. If temple law is there surely Court will give same judgement., why prayers?

    DisAgree [58] Agree [44] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    DC's name or No name in invitation but DC is free to attend temple festival....

    DisAgree [20] Agree [77] Reply Report Abuse

  • ravi, mangalore

    Wed, Mar 30 2016

    It happens only in India. Can you guess. WHY GOVT IS NOT TAKEN MAJID UNDER CONTROL OF GOVT. FOR TEMPLE ONE RULES, FOR OTHERS ONE RULES. HINDUS HAVE TO PRAY IN TEMPLE. IF THEY DONATE MONEY IT WILL GO TO GOVT.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Puttur: Row over inclusion of DC's name - HC orders reprinting of invitations



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.