Bengaluru: HC quashes addtl charge-sheet in Fr K J Thomas murder case


From Our Special Correspondent

Daijiworld Media Network

Bengaluru, Aug 31: In A major setback to the prosecution in the investigation in the murder case of Fr K J Thomas, the then Rector of St Peter’s Pontifical Seminary in Bengaluru on the Easter midnight of April 1, 2013, the Karnataka High Court has quashed the second additional charge-sheet filed against six accused, including four Catholic priests.

Justice Anand Byrareddy, who on Tuesday delivered his order that was reserved pertaining to the appeal against the second additional charge-sheet filed on December 26 last year against the six accused persons, one of whom Fr Chowrappa Selvaraj alias Chasara had died on March 16, quashing the proceedings in the Additional City Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court in the Fr K J Thomas murder case.

The single-judge High Court bench headed by Justice Anand Byrareddy in his order allowed the petitions filed by Fr Anbu John, Fr A Thomas, Fr I Anthappa, B A Anthony Prasad, Raphael Raj and Rita Rini, Editor of Kannada journal Mathukathe. Staunch Kannada protagonist Fr Chowrappa Selvaraj alias Chasara had died on March 16 and his funeral was held on the following day in the city.


Fr K J Thomas

"In the present case, when the case sought to be made out against accused number 1 to 4 itself was on the basis of circumstantial evidence, the case against the petitioners, who are sought to be arraigned as accused number 6 to 12 (accused number 8 is dead), stands even more diluted. This is especially so when it is noticed that the additional statement of witnesses referring to the association of the present petitioners with accused number 1 to 5 does not by itself make out a case against the accused," the order said.

Further, the High Court has held that "the half-hearted initiation of proceedings against the petitioners, after a considerable time, when the statement of witnesses on which reliance was placed in presenting the additional charge-sheet, was already available when the main charge-sheet was filed, is another circumstance that would militate against the proceedings being initiated against the petitioners."

Leading lawyers C H Hanumantharaya, senior advocate B V Acharya and R P Chandrashekar had appeared on behalf of the petitioners accused in the second additional charge-sheet.

Of the four priests accused in the second additional charge-sheet, the High Court had granted conditional bail to Fr I Anthappa due to his advanced age and health conditions. While Fr Chowrappa Selvaraj alias Chasara had died in March this year, the other accused were recently granted bail by the High Court.

In the first charge-sheet filed in 2014, five persons were accused in the murder of the Rector and three persons, including two priests Fr William Patrick and Fr Elias Daniel, and a lay person Carmel Peter were arrested. Two other persons listed as accused in the murder of the Rector and identified simply as Swamy and Francis are absconding.

Fr William Patrick, who was the Parish Priest of St Francis Church, Kengeri, and Carmelite priest Fr Elias Daniel had been granted bail by the Supreme Court on July 25.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • gabriel, sagar

    Fri, Sep 02 2016

    In the words of Leo Tolstoy: God sees the Truth, but waits. Truth has no tomorrows, but Lies do have many tomorrows.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues., Frazer Town,Bangalore

    Thu, Sep 01 2016

    This is a murder case of a priest which has really raised the eye brows of the public require early detection and punishment of culprits

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • V.Baretto, Bantwal-Bangalore

    Thu, Sep 01 2016

    No surprise at the verdict

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rita, Germany

    Thu, Sep 01 2016

    let us not judge the accused ones,because we know nothing personally.There is a judge above and he will judge on final day,where noone can escape from it.

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • k b r, mangluru

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    I think Fr Chasara has already found justice in the hands of Lord...no human can plead that he is guilty, no human can pronounce him guilty and no human can punish him for guilt.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rk, Kinnigoli/Dubai

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    "Bhagwan Ke Ghar Der Hai Andher Nahin Hai"

    DisAgree Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • hilda, Africa

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    Must Put them in the jail till their death,should not give bail even to old priest,must give them hard work in the prison

    DisAgree [5] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • piliyas pcc, kadri, london

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    nobody can escape from the wrath of god!today in this world lawyers can make the guilty innocent! but there is one who is looking everything from up!!!

    DisAgree [3] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Pratap Rao, Bangalore

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    Courts are not expected to provide justice. Justice is for those who have money. In the present case it looks that nobody has killed Fr. K. J. Thomas. How did he die then? Are all absolved?

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • AMAR NATHAL, MANGALORE

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    Given our legal system, late Fr. Thomas won't be surprised if none of the accused is found guilty. Worst still if it is found that Late Fr. Chasara is the sole guilty person. That would shift the the trial to the world of the dead, or to the Eternal Court as its beyond the juridical territory of our courts.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bengaluru: HC quashes addtl charge-sheet in Fr K J Thomas murder case



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.