Centre seeks Supreme Court's 'urgent' intervention in D K Shivakumar case


Daijiworld Media Network - Bengaluru

Bengaluru, Sep 1: The Central government has sought Supreme Court’s intervention on the stay granted by various high courts on graft matters. Of the 40 petitions, a case of land denotification has also been booked against Karnataka energy minister D K Shivakumar under Prevention of Corruption Act, wherein the Minister has obtained a stay.

The Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar presented the 40 petitions to a bench presided over by Justice Madan B Lokur and comprising of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Deepak Gupta. He submitted an "urgency in these matters because a large number of trials have stayed" and said the matter is required to be put before a three-judge bench.

However, the bench noted that they were sitting in three-judge combination only for a day and it was difficult to conclude the hearing on the date itself. They directed the registry to place the matter before the Chief Justice for constituting a three-judge bench.

The petitions, pending since 2013, sought an interpretation of Section 19(3)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The provision stated that no court shall stay the proceedings under this Act on any ground. Neither should any court exercise the power of revision in relation to any interlocutory order passed in any inquiry, trial, appeal or other proceedings.

The issue for consideration before the apex court is if the high court can entertain petitions under Article 226 (writ jurisdiction) of the Constitution and under Section 482 (inherent power) of the Criminal Procedure Code and stay the proceedings in the corruption cases.

The question for adjudication also included if the framing of charges is an interlocutory order or not and if the same is open to revision by the HC.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    BJP wants to win the Karnatake assembly election by charging the influential leaders to gain in the poll

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian dsouza, chik/bengaluru

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    SC urgently needs to have a detailed enquiry into gorahkpur where 100 innocent kids died , huge losses and the demonitisation decision , large restructing of loans worth crores of rupees to few large corporates,

    DisAgree [5] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • ca girishkk, m'lore/dxb

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    BJP is feeling the heat of Gowda Community's ire & curse for its vendetta politics...,
    Now after all the flop show...., trying its best to salvage voters attention & regard to its party candidates in the upcoming assembly elections...,

    vinasha kale vipareetha buddi....!!!!

    Gowda community should give back to BJP a fitting reply thru their electoral franchise...,

    jh
    jai hind...,

    DisAgree [4] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • SMR, Karkala

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    The urgency of center is not to eradicate 'corruption' but to fix the powerful Congress leader. The IT raids are mastered with the aim to cash in for the forth coming Karnataka assembly elections.

    Why the same urgency is not applicable to;
    1. Vyapam scam?
    2.PDS Scam?
    3. Rs 1000-crore Srijan scam of Sushil Modi in Bihar?
    4.Panama gate scam
    5.Lastly, Karnataka's own denotification and mining scam of BJP?

    The BJP which don't have anything to show to the public wanted to use the IT raid as trump card to use them in next assembly elections. At the same time it worships the corrupt,rapist,criminal and porn loving leaders of the state.

    BJP is promising 'Good governance' retaining the same criminals and corrupt as future of Karnataka.


    Jai Hind

    DisAgree [5] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • shan, dubai

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    Asaram Bapu case: Supreme Court questions Gujarat govt over slow pace of trial but centre seeks supreme courts urgent intervention in D.K.Shivakumar case?????

    DisAgree [5] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    They doesn't know it would boomerang on their own CM candidate Yeddy who has too stayed many cases through High Court.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rama Ganiga, Bidar/New Delhi

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    Center doesn't want to intervene in Yedurappa and Reddys case of KARNATAKA LOOTMAR. Because they (BJP) will loose each and every elections.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [36] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ajeet, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    For BJP except Congress nothing comes to their picture... Violence, rape, corruption these are all the last option... What about Ram Rahim.. If he was Muslim...congress....

    DisAgree [10] Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sethu, Mangalore

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    Money Power can move anything. Forty stays secured from high courts in graft cases! Newtons laws of motion is an exception here....! Incredible India.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • JP, Mangalore/USA

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    If center have to intervene on something then it is issue like Ram Rahim's supporters violence but center is busy in doing political vedantha !

    DisAgree [7] Agree [37] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Sep 01 2017

    Desperately trying to save CM candidate B S Yeddyurappa ...

    DisAgree [12] Agree [49] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Centre seeks Supreme Court's 'urgent' intervention in D K Shivakumar case



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.