Bengaluru: CM rebuts BJP's denotification charges with documents, lambasts 'silly behaviour'


From Our Special Correspondent
Daijiworld Media Network - Bengaluru

Bengaluru, Oct 11: Armed with official documents, which were unveiled before the media on Wednesday, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah refuted the allegations by BJP MLC BJ Puttaswamy regarding the alleged denotification of six acres of prime land in Boopasandra Village, and asserted that the allegations were totally false, friviolous, baseless and politically motivated.

Addressing the media at his Home Office, Krishna, in Bengaluru, he said: "There are no documents or any piece of paper to show that I passed an order denotifying survey numbers 20 and 21 measuring 3.34 acres and 2.32 acres in the Bhoopasandra village."

"I don't understand why BJP is resorting to such silly behaviour by levelling frivolous and baseless allegations," he said.

The Chief Minister said there is a set procedure for land to be denotified and BJP's MLC should be well conversant with the procedure.

Siddaramaiah said, "Under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, a committee headed by an Additional Chief Secretary has to take a decision on de-notification. In the Bhoopasandra case, no such request was made either from the BDA or the Urban Development Department."

According to Siddaramaiah, preliminary notification was issued for 131.33 acres of land in 1978 and final notification was issued for 108.17 acres in 1983.

However, only 69.22 acres was actually taken possession of in 1987. "The layout was formed only on 13.34 acres with 234 sites, of which 132 sites were allotted," he said.

"It was in August 1992 that the then government denotified land. Land allottees challenged this and moved High Court, which in 1996, quashed the de-notification. Land went back to the allottees," Siddaramaiah said.

"In 2002, the original landowners filed a writ appeal. In 2004, a division bench of the High Court dismissed the petition and upheld the quashing of the de-notification. The court observed that the petitioners could approach the state government for relief without affecting the interest of the allottees," he said.

Another landowner, Syed Bashid, moved Supreme Court, which dismissed his petition in November 2015, Siddaramaiah pointed out.

"Again in February 2016, some landowners moved High Court, challenging the final notification. Here, the court observed that under Section 24 of the BDA Act, the scheme had lapsed," Siddaramaiah said.

The BDA withdrew its appeal after the Law Department opined that it was "not a fit case for appeal."

The Chief Minister confirmed that he received two letters from MLA, Vasanth Bangera, seeking regularisation of four revenue sites.

"While this was not connected with the case in question here, I wrote in my remarks on the letters that it be examined and discussed. The words ‘examine' and ‘discuss' are commonly used for requests that any minister receives. Does this become an order?," he asked.

In all this, Siddaramaiah said he had no role to play whatsoever.

"I didn't even receive the file. Where's the question of de-notification," he asked.

"BJP's B J Puttaswamy who has made this allegation against me has also suppressed the fact that the government had brought the Bhoopasandra case to the court's notice," he said.

Siddaramaiah said he was consulting advocates on taking legal action against BJP for having made such allegations.

He did not say if he would take action in his capacity as the Chief Minister or as an individual.

"I was also Leader of Opposition for four years, but have not seen such silly behaviour," he said, referring to the BJP.
"There's a limit for lying," he added.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Gangaram, Moodbidri

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    BJP nuts are totaly desparated and frustrated......

    They know very well that their bakth will be happy always whatever nonsense they say.....

    DisAgree [1] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    BJP members are losing hopes
    And day by day frustration builds
    Know that wining the elections
    Not like winning the game of chess
    Siddanna, we are with you always.
    Jai Siddanna
    Jai Karnataka
    BJP naka, naka
    Maka naka tuka naka

    DisAgree [3] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • J.F.D SOUZA, Attavar, Mangalore

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    Why this fact has not been brought out earlier? What made the BJP to disclose it now. Its just a trick to defame CM Siddu to lodge false allegations against him. BJP should stop such kind of cheap publicity.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Oct 11 2017

    BJP is fully Frustrated ...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Deva, Pilar

    Wed, Oct 11 2017

    Sidduji don't worry ..........Jai hooo

    DisAgree [2] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • gangaram, mangalore

    Wed, Oct 11 2017

    bhai congressi sab dongi hain

    DisAgree [49] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Gangaram, Moodbidri

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    I will not add original or duplicate in my name you carry on buddy...

    hai tho BJP walo ka aukad hai......

    copy cats... in state govts to central govt and in names also!!!!!

    DisAgree [2] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Wed, Oct 11 2017

    Mr Sid, just file Rs 200 crores defamation case against these scrupulous BJP ministers. Next time they will think 10 times before opening thier dirty mouths.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [49] Reply Report Abuse

  • RSRB, Kundapur/Singapur

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    Swamy, Mangalore

    Why defamation case next time? If guts, this time itself file defamation case..
    Aaa...? scared?

    At first I ignored this case. But now Nidde rama came to press conference with some documents, I start believing...

    DisAgree [14] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Marian D'Souza, Falnir Mangalore

    Wed, Oct 11 2017

    Jay Shah has filed 2 suits in Ahmedabad against the news portal The Wire for an expose of his defunct company's phenomenonal jump in profits by 16000% in 3 yrs from 2014.One is a criminal defamation suit and another civil defamation claiming damages of 100 crores.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • ABD, LOS ANGELES

    Wed, Oct 11 2017

    CORRUPT NIDDERAMAIAH WILL LAND IN JAIL SOON FOR HIS SERIOUS DENOTIFICATION CHARGES

    DisAgree [60] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdul Aleem Faroqui, UAE

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    Siddaramaya will land in jail
    BJP will win the election
    Congress mukth will b a reality
    PM Modi will rule for ever
    Gau rakshaks will be a legal entity
    Ghar wapsi
    Beef ban throughout India
    Saffron shawls mandatory in schools & colleges
    and bla bla bla... happy now?? Keep dreaming.. this is what you, BJP and blind bhatks want isnt it? Narrow minded....

    DisAgree [4] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohit, Mangalore

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    You nailed it correctly. This is Hindustan.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdul Aleem Faroqui, UAE

    Thu, Oct 12 2017

    Yes Brother Mohit!! Unfortunately.. I dont know will the people understand coexistence,harmony and mutual respect..Hope not too late.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bengaluru: CM rebuts BJP's denotification charges with documents, lambasts 'silly behaviour'



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.