Mangalore United Dubs Cheating Allegations Baseless


Mangalore United Dubs Cheating Allegations Baseless

Media Release

Mangalore, Sep 19: B M Farookh, brother of Moideen Bava has issued clarification against allegations by Santhosh Suvarna, who has alleged Farookh and Moideen Bava of cheating him of Rs 1.10 crore offered to acquire partnership in Mangalore United under Karnataka Premier League (KPL).

Farookh in a written statement to daijiworld.com stated that, “The allegations to the effect that we have agreed to make Santhosh Suvarna a partner of our company is absolutely false and baseless and highly derogatory in nature. Moreover, name of my brother Bava, a political leader, was unnecessarily dragged into the controversy to tarnish his image. We have never ever offered Suvarna of any partnership either in any of our companies or in the team. He was only given the team sponsorship for one year during KPL first season. It appears that Suvarna has filed a complaint against me and my brother Bava alleging that we have cheated him to the tune of Rs 1.10 crore. We were shocked and surprised when we came to know from the news that appeared in visual and print media on September 17, 2010 edition without even affording us an opportunity to clarify the truth.”

Elaborating on the issue, Farookh stated that Fiza Developers owned by him was the sole franchisee for the Mangalore team for five years in the location of Mangalore and Udupi having been granted the franchisee right by the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) including the right to manage the team in the KPL, a 20/20 cricket tourney being the highest bidder. They have also been given the right to have sponsorship for the team name, team sponsorship, logo sponsorship, entitlement to publicity and hospitality.

He stated “Thereby a franchisee agreement was entered into between KSCA and Fiza developers on August 6 2009. As per clause no 7.2 of the agreement, we are entitled to exploit the franchisee rights in any manner as per our discretion. There is no limit for commercial exploitation of franchisee right granted in our favour. One Santosh Suvarna of Global Associates approached us and requested us to be a co-sponsor with respect to the team sponsorship right and entitlement to publicity and hospitality. As per rights conferred on us under the above said clause Suvarna and his company was permitted by us to have the team sponsorship, publicity and hospitality sponsorship for which he agreed to pay us a sum of Rs 1.20 crores. Following this we informed him by a letter dated August 7, 2009 that he can be a co-sponsor for the said limited purpose for a period of one year (first edition of KPL tourney). Accordingly he had also paid Rs 1.10 crores in total in consideration of acquiring team sponsorship rights and publicity and hospitality for the KPL’s first edition.”  

Further, “The rights acquired by Fiza Developers are personal and not transferable as per clause no 10.1 under the agreement. As such the question of offering any share in franchisee does not arise. Suvarna also approached us for obtaining sponsorship rights for the second edition of KPL 2010 and since he is a defaulter in the first edition, we asked him to pay the balance of the sponsorship fee and also additional fee for the second edition,” he added.

It can be recalled here that on the inaugural day of Karnataka Premier League season II a controversy was created with a Mangalore businessman Santosh Suvarna alleging that Moideen Bhawa, the owner of KPL team Mangalore United, and Bhawa’s brother B M Farookh had cheated him of Rs 1.10 crore. Following a complaint by Suvarna and case registered thereafter Bangalore court has also directed Cubbon Park police to investigate the matter.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • M.E.Moolur, Udupi.Dubai

    Tue, Sep 21 2010

    The entire episode can be analyzed in two parts.
    • Part one-Mr.Suvarna claims that he paid Rs.1.1 crore so called “white money”, without any agreements ! Any transactions without a legitimate agreements, naturally lack factual base.
    • Part two-Mr.Faruk Bava claims with relevant documents, that Mr.Suvarna is a co sponsor of KPL only for its first edition. So naturally as per simple judicial procedure, it is the petitioner, Mr.Suvarna who has to provide substantial evidence to prove his claims.
    Any how, the Dynamic Bawa Brothers deserves appreciation for their endurances, who made Mangalore an epicenter of cricket, the most popular game of India. I wish them every success and hope Mangalore United, under their able and dedicated leadership, will rise to the most elevated position in the arena of this game-M.E.Moolur.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Shridhar, Mangalore

    Mon, Sep 20 2010

    Just wait for few Days/months, then you will find both parties going for out of court settlement and will hug each other in public. Both of them would not like to disclose all the financial details to the court...

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Ummer KunhiMK, Perinje/Dubai

    Sun, Sep 19 2010

    I doubt there is a hanky -panky in the clarification. if there is no wrong doing,Mr. Suvarna will not file a case agnaist BAVA brothers.now ball&bat on Judge's court.just wait and see!!!!!!!

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Ummer KunhiMK, Perinje/Dubai

    Sun, Sep 19 2010

    I doubt there is a hanky -panky in the clarification. if there is no wrong doing,Mr. Suvarna will not file a case agnaist BAVA brothers.now ball&bat on Judge's court.just wait and see!!!!!!!

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Harold D'cunha, Mangalore,India

    Sun, Sep 19 2010

    Mr. Aziz bedra, I agree with your word ' good clarification". But how can u say 'IT IS THE TRUTH'. Are u part of the franchise.
    There is no fire without smoke. Mr. Suvarna, who is aggrieved party will not take risk of his fame and name by creating this issue, unless there might be some truth. This does not mean I am at any cost supporting Mr. Suvarna. But in between the line the question of 1.1 crore money involvement of Mr. Suvrana gives the understanding that there is some sort of agreement verbal or written which fact has to be clarified. For me this is just news about Mr. Suvarna as it is about Mr. Bava to me.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • ISMAIL K PERINJE, PERINJE/YANBU-KSA

    Sun, Sep 19 2010

    If said clarification is a 'white paper'as it appears to be, on the issue of sponsorhip of KPL-Mangalore United team then Mr Farookh has every right to sue Mr suvarna for a defamation of their reputation.

    Mr Suvarana pls clarify and if not it's 20 th century, is it possible to be fooled by some one as you alleges, FIZA company ???

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Vasant Raj, Udupi/Abudhabi

    Sun, Sep 19 2010

    ONLY THE ALMIGHTY GOD KNOWS WHAT IS THE TRUTH Mr.AZIZ BEDRA.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • aziz bedra, moodbidri-dubai

    Sun, Sep 19 2010

    A GOOD CLARIFICATION BY MR.FAROOK.IT IS THE TRUTH.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Naveen Shetty, Mangalore

    Sun, Sep 19 2010

    The matter is subjudice now and Mr. Bava and his Co. should not be worried if there is nothing material about the allegations. But it is time for the authorities to ascertain that the sources of funds (both capital and sponsorship money) being collected by owners. If the money which was collected by Managlore United owners has come from illegal sources than the Franchisee is at fault as it failed to check the money laundering.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Mangalore United Dubs Cheating Allegations Baseless



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.