'Default bail, if charge sheet not filed by 61st/91st day', SC dismisses ED's appeal in DHFL case


New Delhi, Mar 27 (IANS): The Supreme Court on Monday said an accused is entitled to default bail if the charge sheet is not filed by 61st/91st day of the remand, while dismissing Enforcement Directorate's (ED) appeal against the grant of default bail to former DHFL promoters, Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan in the Yes Bank case.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice K.M. Joseph said the remand period will be calculated from the date, magistrate remand the accused and further added that an accused becomes entitled to default bail if the charge sheet is not filed by 61st or 91st day of the remand period.

The top court dismissed the appeal filed by the ED against the Bombay High Court order, which granted bail to former DHFL promoters Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan in a Yes Bank money laundering case.

The bench answered the larger issue referred to it by a two-judge bench in February 2021 and directed the pending petitions connected with the case be placed before a two-judge bench. In February, the apex court had reserved its verdict on the appeal of ED.

In 2021, the apex court had referred to a larger bench the legal question, whether the day on which an accused is remanded to custody should be included while considering the 60-day period for the grant of default bail. The top court in September 2020, stayed the Bombay High Court order granting bail to the promoters.

In August 2020, the high court granted bail to the Wadhawans saying that the mandatory default bail is the sequel to non-filing of charge sheet.

 

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: 'Default bail, if charge sheet not filed by 61st/91st day', SC dismisses ED's appeal in DHFL case



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.