SC junks plea seeking to quash non-gender neutral provisions of Constitution


New Delhi, Jul 4 (IANS):  The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking direction to abolish male pronouns contained in the provisions of the Indian Constitution.

“Some (recent) provisions now use the word Chairperson. The earlier provisions use Chairman. Are we going to strike down Constitutional provisions on that ground?" asked a bench headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud to the petitioner, a law student.

"When the Constitution says Chairman, does that mean that a woman will not be appointed? No. Even a woman can be appointed," remarked CJI Chandrachud while dismissing the plea.

"Next time we will impose costs for such matters. Focus on your studies," said the bench while cautioning the petitioner-in-person of imposing costs for filing such a PIL.

In his PIL, the petitioner Harsh Gupta, claimed violation of equality guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution when numerous articles uses the male pronouns like “he”, "Chairman", "Deputy Chairman" etc.

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: SC junks plea seeking to quash non-gender neutral provisions of Constitution



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.