Manish Sisodia's bail pleas: Rs 100 crore demanded, ED and CBI tell SC


New Delhi, Aug 5 (IANS): During the hearing on the bail pleas filed by senior AAP leader Manish Sisodia in the liquor policy case, the CBI and the ED on Monday told the Supreme Court that a Rs. 100 crore bribe was demanded by the Aam Aadmi Party for the Goa elections, out of which Rs. 45 crore has been traced in the course of investigation.

“A Rs 100 crore bribe was demanded to be used for Goa elections. Out of which we have been able to trace 45 crores. We have digital evidence. There is a lot of evidence,” submitted Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju, representing the central agencies, before a bench presided over by Justice BR Gavai.

Raju said that Sisodia was in-charge of the excise department of the Delhi government and co-accused Vijay Nair was tasked to receive the kickbacks.

He said: “They wanted to make money out of this exercise. There is evidence to show that this particular gentleman (Sisodia) engineered emails and told certain interns to write a particular type of email.”

On the other hand, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Sisodia, contended that the AAP leader has been in custody for 17 months and should be granted bail on the ground of delay in the conclusion of the trial.

Singhvi also prayed that Sisodia be released on interim bail. He said his wife has “a very very bad medical condition” and is virtually like a vegetable."

The apex court will continue to hear the matter on August 12.

In an earlier hearing, the top court had issued notice and asked the central agencies to file their reply to Sisodia’s bail pleas

“Issue notice returnable on July 29. We will hear this on Monday after two weeks,” it said on July 16.

In its judgment delivered on October 30 last year, the SC had denied bail to the former Deputy CM but said that if the trial proceeds slowly in the next three months, he may apply for bail afresh.

Special Judge Kaveri Baweja of the Rouse Avenue Court had on April 30 refused to grant bail to Sisodia who was seeking regular bail a second time. Denying bail, the trial court order noted that delays in the case proceedings were largely due to actions attributable to Sisodia himself, dismissing his claims of undue delay.

Subsequently, the Delhi High Court denied bail to Sisodia, saying that he failed to pass the triple test for grant of bail in the corruption case and the twin conditions required under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

Challenging this, the former Deputy CM filed special leave petitions before the Supreme Court. Last month, the apex court had disposed off the pleas seeking bail in corruption and money laundering cases after Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta gave an undertaking that the final charge sheet/complaint in the liquor policy case would be filed by July 3.

Meanwhile, a court here extended the judicial custody of Sisodia, till August 9 in the CBI case and till August 13 in the money laundering case. He was produced through video conferencing from Tihar Jail upon expiry of the previously granted judicial custody.

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Damodar Das, Kundapur

    Tue, Aug 06 2024

    This Rs 100 crores bribe and Rs 45 crores recovered can only be verified and believed if ED and CBI presents the investigation report to the court and then the court trial proceeds and the court decides only then its official that who is guilty and who innocent as per court verdict. Only court has this authority and to declare a person guilty or innocent. ED and CBI has no authority here.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Manish Sisodia's bail pleas: Rs 100 crore demanded, ED and CBI tell SC



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.