Karnataka HC restrains 38 media houses from reporting on actor Darshan’s case


Daijiworld Media Network - Bengaluru

Bengaluru, Sep 10: In a significant legal development, the High Court of Karnataka has issued an interim order restraining 38 media platforms from publishing, broadcasting, or disseminating confidential information related to the charge sheet against actor Darshan Srinivas. The charge sheet, filed by the Kamakshipalya police, pertains to the murder of Renukaswamy.

Justice Hemant Chandangoudar issued the order after Darshan's petition demonstrated a prima facie case for an ex parte interim order. Darshan sought this injunction to prevent media outlets from revealing sensitive details contained in the charge sheet.

The court has directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to inform the 38 media platforms of the order. The Ministry is also responsible for ensuring compliance and taking action against any violations.

Senior counsel Prabhuling K Navadagi, representing Darshan, argued that despite an existing temporary injunction issued by a civil court on August 27, which similarly barred media from publishing confidential details, the media continued to disseminate such information. This, Navadagi contended, violated legal standards of free and fair journalism and amounted to a prejudicial media trial.

Darshan's legal team asserted that the media's coverage was not only damaging his reputation but also interfering with the ongoing investigation. They criticized the media for conducting interviews and broadcasting opinions from retired police officers and former employees, which they claimed was designed to influence public opinion negatively.

Navadagi also referenced previous judgments from the Bombay High Court, Karnataka High Court, and the Supreme Court to support the need for the restraining order.

This court decision highlights the ongoing tension between media freedom and the protection of individual rights during legal proceedings.

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Af,,,, mangaluru

    Wed, Sep 11 2024

    What more evidences need by police or court , it is already three months over, it is a money making tactics of lawyers and courts simply wasting time and Media is un necessarily dragging the issue day and night .

    DisAgree [2] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Pinthaam, Mangloor

    Wed, Sep 11 2024

    The judge in this case is acting like Darshan's lawyer......it is clearly in violation of freedom of speech and freedom of press!!

    DisAgree [4] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • J.F.D Souza, Attavar, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 11 2024

    Ball by ball commentry we dont want to know about Darshans case. Let the media report the important points and issues and not like Ramayana- Mahabharatha

    DisAgree [5] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Anand, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 11 2024

    This so called actor is afraid that his ‘reputation ‘ will be tarnished ??? If one reads the details of how he murdered the guy , it is clear that he is the devil himself.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, INDIA

    Tue, Sep 10 2024

    Darshan is directly involved in Renukaswamy’s murder along with Pavitra Gowda. What can the media and others do about this? This case should be concluded as quickly as possible, and all the accused should be given a lifetime sentence or an even harsher punishment. Being a celebrity does not make anyone above the law.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [94] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Karnataka HC restrains 38 media houses from reporting on actor Darshan’s case



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.