Daijiworld Media Network – Panaji

Panaji, Jul 25: High drama unfolded in the Goa Legislative Assembly on Thursday morning as Opposition MLAs stormed into the well of the House, protesting the Town and Country Planning (TCP) Department’s refusal to answer questions related to the controversial Section 39A of the Goa TCP Act.

The uproar erupted after Revolutionary Goans Party MLA Viresh Borkar raised objections to TCP Minister Vishwajit Rane’s assertion that replies on Section 39A could not be provided since the matter is sub-judice and pending before the High Court. Rane cited the “Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of the Goa Legislative Assembly” to defend the department’s silence.

“What’s the problem in giving answers? Every time this issue comes up, it’s postponed. This is an attempt to withhold vital information from the public,” Borkar charged, expressing anger over the minister’s stance.

Leader of Opposition Yuri Alemao also came down heavily on the government, questioning the selective use of the sub-judice clause. “Just two days ago, we discussed the Mhadei issue in this House though it is also in court. Why is the TCP hiding behind legal technicalities?” he asked, even suggesting the department be renamed the “Sub-Judice Department.”

Despite mounting pressure, Minister Rane remained firm. “There are rules. I am following them. They can say what they want, but no discussion can be held on this,” he said, refusing to budge.

All Opposition MLAs, barring Goa Forward Party MLA Vijai Sardesai, entered the well of the House, raising slogans and demanding accountability. As the protest escalated, the Speaker adjourned the session for 10 minutes and urged members to maintain order.

The Opposition also demanded a ruling from the Speaker on whether matters under Section 39A could be discussed in the Assembly if the government labels them sub-judice. The Speaker deferred a decision and assured that a response would be given after the recess.

Interestingly, Vijai Sardesai, known for his vocal interventions, remained silent and stayed away from the protest, drawing attention from both ruling and opposition benches.

Section 39A of the Goa TCP Act, which allows for the regularisation of unauthorised constructions under specific conditions, has long been a contentious issue. The Opposition has intensified its call for transparency and public accountability, accusing the government of shielding questionable decisions.