Beltangady: Mohd Riyaz Farangipete convicted in 'provocative speech' case, gets 6-month jail term


Daijiworld Media Network - Beltangady

Beltangady, Aug 4: A court in Beltangady has convicted a man in a “provocative speech” case linked to a protest meeting held in 2015, sentencing him to six months’ simple imprisonment and imposing a fine of Rs 10,000.

The case was registered at the Beltangady police station against Mohammed Riyaz Farangipete after an incident on July 23, 2015, during a protest meeting organised by the Popular Front of India (PFI), Beltangady zone, near the Belthangady taluk office.

According to the case details, Riyaz had allegedly delivered a provocative speech during the protest in a manner that hurt religious sentiments. Following this, police registered Crime No. 315/2015 against him under Sections 153(A) and 295(A) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The investigation was carried out by the then Belthangady police sub-inspector and investigating officer Ravi B S, who collected the necessary evidence and submitted the chargesheet before the court.

During the trial, the court examined the evidence and, after finding the charges against the accused proved, held him guilty.

Delivering the verdict, Judge Ramalingappa sentenced the accused under Section 153(A) of the IPC to six months’ simple imprisonment and directed him to pay a fine of Rs 10,000.

The prosecution was represented by assistant public prosecutor Ashitha, who effectively argued the case before the court.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Raheem shek beary, chikmagalore

    Wed, Aug 05 2026

    Dear all, provocative speeches like should not be allowed, but the police has to be very common for all the citizens of india. there were too many people spoken in very bad manner which may create communal and violence . all are equal in this part of world, every one has the right to speak , but the speeches if it hurts any religion , which should be avoided, why the hell people speak like this, which will be viral so soon and people start complaining and end up with FIR. why create this problems. its with government hand to make sure that, this type of issues has to be dealt with them very strictly irrespective of the any type of religion

    DisAgree [4] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sachidananda Shetty, Dubai/Mundkur

    Wed, Aug 05 2026

    Not known too much about this person...... but people deserve it if they really doing so

    DisAgree [5] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • ravi, Mangalore

    Wed, Aug 05 2026

    This person is serial offender who always gives this provocation speech. 6 month is probably less.

    DisAgree [19] Agree [37] Reply Report Abuse

  • Olive Nest Inc, Mangalore / Brampton - Canada

    Wed, Aug 05 2026

    At this stage, considering everything happening in the country, I feel this punishment is unfair and disproportionate. In my opinion, there appears to be unequal treatment when it comes to accountability. I see serious concerns about how protesters, students, and critics are treated, while I believe those in positions of power often escape comparable scrutiny. Justice should be applied fairly and equally to everyone, regardless of political affiliation or status. This is about perceived unequal enforcement without asserting unverified wrongdoing as fact.

    DisAgree [28] Agree [36] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph Mathias, Belthangady Taluk

    Tue, Aug 04 2026

    Super decision by court. This pathetic person deserves to be behind bars for 60 years not 6 months.

    DisAgree [29] Agree [40] Reply Report Abuse

  • DaNIEL, Mangalore

    Wed, Aug 05 2026

    Joseph Mathias, Belthangady Taluk Law should be applied equally to everyone, regardless of political affiliation or religion. If any person—whether from the BJP, Congress, or any other party—makes speeches that promote hatred or threaten violence against Christians, Muslims, Hindus, or any other community, they should face the same legal action. There have been allegations and police cases against leaders such as Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat and Harish Poonja Udupi BLP MLA over alleged hate or provocative speeches. These allegations have led to FIRs and legal proceedings, and the courts have squashed these cases . Is this right ? The principle of the rule of law is that no one should be above the law. If anyone, including public representatives, threatens violence or makes speeches that incite hatred against any religious community or individual, the matter should be investigated fairly, and appropriate legal action should be taken based on the evidence and the law.

    DisAgree [15] Agree [53] Reply Report Abuse

  • Prakash, Mangalore

    Tue, Aug 04 2026

    A welcome decision. Let this be a reminder that everyone must respect the law and use words that promote peace, unity, and mutual respect.

    DisAgree [15] Agree [47] Reply Report Abuse

  • I am also Das, Mangalore

    Wed, Aug 05 2026

    Good work by karnataka police good job good job good job . Anti India people must be in jail

    DisAgree [29] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Beltangady: Mohd Riyaz Farangipete convicted in 'provocative speech' case, gets 6-month jail term



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.