2004 temple murder case: Kanchi Shankaracharya, 22 others acquitted


2004 temple murder case: Kanchi Shankaracharya, 22 others acquitted

Updated

Puducherry, Nov 27 (IANS): A Puducherry court Wednesday acquitted all the accused in the high-profile Sankararaman murder case in which two seers of Kanchipuram Sankara Mutt Jayendra Saraswathi and Vijayendra Saraswathi are the prime accused.

The judgment was delivered by Puducherry Principal District and Sessions Judge C.S. Murugan in the trial that was spread over nine years.

The judge said the witnesses were not able to support the prosecution case of murder conspiracy against the two seers.

Both the seers were present in the court when the judgement was delivered. Immediately on hearing the verdict, the two seers left the court premises.

Speaking to reporters, counsel for the two seers said the prosecution has not proved the charge of conspiracy behind the murder.

The wife, son and daughter of Sankararaman were also not able to identify the murderers.

Counsel added this is not a fit case for appeal in the higher court for the government.

A. Sankararaman, who worked as a manager in the Varadarajaperumal temple in Kanchipuram in Tamil Nadu, was murdered inside his office in the temple Sep 3, 2004.

According to police, Sankararaman was writing complaint letters to the Mutt under a pseudonym about financial misappropriation.

The two seers of Sankara Mutt in Kanchipuram - Jayendra Saraswathi and Vijayendra Saraswathi - were cited as accused number one and two.

Tamil Nadu Police arrested Jayendra Saraswathi in Andhra Pradesh on Diwali day in 2004, shocking not only the followers of the Kanchi Sankara Mutt but also Hindus in general.

One of the accused, M. Kathiravan was murdered in March this year here.

There were 22 other accused, including manager of Sankara Mutt N. Sundaresan, and Jayendra Saraswathi's brother M.K. Raghu.

All the 24 were charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code for criminal conspiracy, abetment to the crime and other crimes.

The case trial was shifted to Puducherry from a Chengalpet court near here on the petition from Jayendra Saraswathi, the senior seer, after he complained that the atmosphere in Tamil Nadu was not right for a free and fair trial. The Supreme Court then allowed the trial to be shifted to Puducherry in 2005.

The apex court also directed the Puducherry government to appoint its own public prosecutor on a petition from Jayendra Saraswathi.

For the trial, 189 witnesses were examined between 2009 and 2012. Interestingly, 83 of them turned hostile. Even the approver, Ravi Subramaniam, turned hostile and denied his earlier statements to police.

The prosecution also examined Padma, wife of Sankararaman, and their son Anand Sharma and daughter Uma Maithreyi.

Welcoming the acquittal Ambur Jai Shankar, president, Vijaya Bharatham Makkal Katchi, told IANS: "Justice has won. Hindus all over the world will be happy now."

He said the police can re-investigate the case to find the real culprit.

Arjun Sampath of Hindu Makkal Katchi told IANS: "Dharmathin vazhu thanai soodhu kavvum, irudhiyil dharmam vellum (Dharma may seem to lose initially to conspiracy but in the end dharma will triumph)."

He said the case was mainly to target the organisation that was revered and kept on high pedestal by Hindus.

"Several anti-Hindu organisations and media threw mud at the Mutt. Now they will have to answer," Sampath added.

Several people assembled at the court premises to hear the judgment. Soon after hearing the verdict, the people shouted slogans in support of the two seers.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • yogesh, bombay

    Thu, Nov 28 2013

    Talwars should have gone to Pondy court for fair trial!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Harold D'cunha, Mangalore, India

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Only the soul of Sankararaman knows' who is his murderer.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Praveen, Udupi

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    God is the best Judge.He know the truth who is the criminal and who is not.

    DisAgree Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Prameela, Udupi

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    This is our law............ God knows who is the guilty????? We see these days there is no way for truth....and sincerity.... In some cases either files are missing or some other reason......We can only pray to God to save our India and real Indians..........

    DisAgree [3] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mangalore Man, Mangalore

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Great news. Justice finally. Many vested interests did witch hunting and character maligning for years on Kanchi Shree and the Mutt. Tehelka also one among them. Now this verdict is one more blow to those who tarnish people and community by screaming either half facts or lies.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • SRIDHAR SHETTY, DOHA /BARKUR

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Everyone has their ups and downs in their life.....god test everyone.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • CONRAD JOHN TAURO, SHIRVA/UDUPI/DUBAI

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Benefit of doubt.

    DisAgree [23] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, BAHRAIN

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Bandhu bab,
    one can twist law in India easily if they are rich & powerful, look at the case of Sawjanya rape & murder and also Akshatha, Saumya & others.

    DisAgree [13] Agree [31] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shreenath, Udupi

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    HENRY MISQUITH, BAHRAIN,
    Your observation is totally correct. But to whom we should blame, if I blame Congress who ruled more the 55 years, the supporter of congress will disagree. If I Blame Opposition their supporters will disagree. I am totally confused.

    DisAgree Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Homer, Bharat

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    We have to simply blame ourselves , mainly for keeping quiet for all these years and falling for silly political plots on emotional issues like religion, caste etc

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • JOHN R LOBO, Kaikamba/Dubai

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    The judicial system....to complete the case in Session Court it took 9 years (2004 – 2013) .. If an appeal to HC then another 5 years....Then Supreme court....If the death penalty then Mercy petition to Hon.President of India.....If the file kept in pending in Rashtrpati Bhavan and then it is cleared .. again review
    petition in Supreme Court. When I read this news , I recalled “ Sunny Deols” famous dialog in the film “ Damini “..........THARIK KE OOPAR THARIK ( date )...

    Bcoz this Tharik ke oopar Tharik ....many people taking laws in their own hand or going to Street Laws and going to Kangaroo Court.....where people will get INSTANT Judgement....

    Mera Bharath Mahan

    DisAgree [3] Agree [32] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    God is great...

    DisAgree [14] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse

  • R.Srinivasan, Chennai

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Good news .Pray God same thing should not repeat in future.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [37] Reply Report Abuse

  • R.Bhandarkar, M'lore

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Who killed the Manager?
    Lord Siva only knows....
    Jai Siva Shambu
    Hara Hara Shambhu
    Mushkil Ab Pehchaannaa...
    Kaun RAHU Kaun KETU....

    DisAgree [5] Agree [46] Reply Report Abuse

  • For Justice, Abu Dhabi / Ubar

    Wed, Nov 27 2013

    Now we can imagine the fate of saujanya case...

    DisAgree [19] Agree [50] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: 2004 temple murder case: Kanchi Shankaracharya, 22 others acquitted



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.