News headlines


Business Line
 
New Delhi, Jun 30: Jet Airways, which is caught in a legal battle with Air Sahara over the collapsed Rs 2,300 crore takeover deal, has claimed that its smaller rival was bound to return Rs 500 crore paid as advance within a week of termination of the pact.

In its application filed before Supreme Court on Wednesday, Jet argued that as per the share purchase agreement (SPA), Sahara India had "undertaken, absolutely and unconditionally" to repay the advance amount of Rs 500 crore if the deal failed.

"This repayment in terms of the undertaking is to be made within seven days from the date of termination or expiry of the SPA without any dispute, demur or delay," Jet said.

Besides seeking transfer of the cases initiated by Air Sahara in a Lucknow district court to Bombay High Court, Jet had prayed for a stay on the interim orders of the Lucknow court, which put a freeze on the escrow account opened by Jet Airways, besides preventing sale of Sahara's shares pledged for Rs 500 crore.

The Naresh Goyal-controlled company said that in terms of Clause 18.5.1 of the SPA, the two sides had agreed to intimate the escrow agent (ICICI Bank) about termination of the deal. Further, as per the clause, the bank was bound to refund the amount to Jet within one working day, the company said. | Go to Sify Business Home page |

India's largest private airline also argued that Clause 18.1 of SPA clearly mentioned the agreement could be terminated automatically without the mandatory requirement of the notice from any party, if the deal was not completed within 65 days.

"Consequently, in terms of the express and specific provision contained in the SPA (in clause 18.1), it stood terminated at the midnight of June 21, 2006," Jet contended. 

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: News headlines



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.