Kejriwal case: Heated exchanges between Jaitley and Jethmalani in HC


New Delhi, May 17 (PTI): Heated exchanges were witnessed between Union Minister Arun Jaitley and senior advocate Ram Jethmalani in the Delhi High Court today during the former's cross-examination in a defamation case against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.

The recording of Jaitley's statement in a civil defamation suit of Rs 10 crore filed by him against Kejriwal and other AAP functionaries could not continue as the Minister objected to the use of a word against him by the veteran lawyer representing the Chief Minister.

The Finance Minister, who appeared before Joint Registrar Deepali Sharma, lost his cool and asked Jethmalani whether the word was used as per instructions from Kejriwal.

"If this is so, I would aggravate the charges against the defendant (Kejriwal)," Jaitley said, adding that there was a limit to personal malice.

Senior advocates Rajiv Nayar and Sandeep Sethi, who were representing Jaitley, also said that Jethmalani was putting scandalous questions and should restrain himself from asking irrelevant ones "as this matter is Arun Jaitley versus Arvind Kejriwal and not Ram Jethmalani versus Arun Jaitley".

To this, Jethmalani said he used the word on the instruction of Kejriwal.
However, Anupam Srivastav, advocate on record for Kejriwal since the beginning of the suit, submitted that he had no instruction on the use of the word.

A group of lawyers including Jethmalani who were defending the AAP leaders also maintained that Jaitley was not entitled to a claim of Rs 10 crore on account of his alleged defamation.

Jaitley has filed the civil defamation suit seeking Rs 10 crore damages from Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders -- Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai -- for accusing him of financial irregularities in the DDCA of which he was the President from 2000 to 2013.

The verbal exchange between Jethmalani and Jaitley started when the former asked a question alleging that his article on irregularities in DDCA could not get published in a weekly magazine at the instance of the Finance Minister.

Jethmalani also alleged that the article pertained to the corruption in DDCA during the period when Jaitley was its President.

The question, however, was disallowed by Joint Registrar observing that she had already termed the article irrelevant on day of recording of the statement on the ground that it was not connected with the instant case. Jethmalani, however, insisted that it was.

He also alleged that Jaitley was "deceiving the people by concealing his guilt of crime."
The counsel representing the Finance Minister vehemently opposed the choice of words by Jethmalani saying he must stop insulting the minister.

However, as Jethmalani continued his attack, the Joint Registrar objected to it and said the senior lawyer and other advocates were crossing the limit and should allow the court to proceed in the matter.

The court listed the matter for further cross-examination on July 28 and July 31 after Kejriwal's counsel asked the court to defer it.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • The Guru, Mangalore

    Thu, May 18 2017

    If you see the proceedings of this case, I feel Kejriwal will loose the battle.. Once this is defamation is done, then there will be one more defamation case from Election commission...

    Hope Kejriwal supporters can shell out these money to pay for defamation..

    All the best to everyone who are related to this case and also to the people who are following this case inside and outside court room

    DisAgree [6] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, KSA

    Thu, May 18 2017

    Mr. Kajeriwal does not have beef exporters financial support. He does not have looted, black money to fight the case. Initially it always looks like truth is losing. However, it will take its own time for truth to triumph.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Leslie, udupi

    Wed, May 17 2017

    These proxy wars are like Hindi serials...
    They heat up to a climax ...
    And then fade down to nothing...
    Public is made confused and the guys have a after party...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Wed, May 17 2017

    Jootli, don't underestimate Jetmalani, though his mind is unstable..

    DisAgree [6] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Albert, Mangalore

    Wed, May 17 2017

    Power hungry Kujli's bad days continue. he has been beaten everywhere...even with old chappal..ink etc..He will be thrown in t gutter by Delhi public! He has to scratch and make noise like ....lost pig in drain!

    DisAgree [38] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, May 18 2017

    Hai Hai Mirchi ...

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, KSA

    Thu, May 18 2017

    Hypertension is not good at this age. Cool down Albert. Wait and watch who will be like a pig in the gutter. Have a cool soda with lime and pinch of salt.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, May 17 2017

    Dil Sachaa Aur Chehra Jhoota ...

    DisAgree [5] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • MILAN, LUCERNE

    Wed, May 17 2017

    JETMALANI HELPED BJP TO WIN THE ELECTION. AFTER THAT BJP NEVER CARED JETMALANI. HE EVEN SAID MODI IS FRAUD.

    IF HE CAN BUILD BJP TO WIN. HE CAN ALSO MAKE SURE THAT BJP WILL LOSE NEXT ELECTION.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [38] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh S, MANGALORE

    Wed, May 17 2017

    ..FORGET ELECTION, LET HIM FIRST ARGUE & WIN THIS CASE FOR KUJLI..OTHERWISE, KUJLI WILL GO BANKRUPT..

    DisAgree [31] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Wed, May 17 2017

    AAP has lot of opportunities to file defamation, false remarks, allegations and reports against BJP and suit for even higher amount. BJP's only intention is to make the opposition weak by filing these suits and "legally " robbing off thier money and making themselves rich. Demonitisation is one example. It's double edged sword.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh S, MANGALORE

    Wed, May 17 2017

    ..but Swamy, KEJRIWALL is paying from Delhi tax payers money..His Deputy passed the bill for payment..His loose tongue cost Delhites dearly..they shown him Door in Municipal elections, by poll..wait for next election..

    DisAgree [16] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Wed, May 17 2017

    Well, Jethmalani had offered to do this free of cost to Kejri. Now if there should be any payment to be done then definitely it will be from public money because it is a public case and not private or personal case. It's upto Jaitley now to prove that there were no irregularities in DDCA case, so was that a foul cry or loose tongue or defamation. How about this case proving against Jaitley and he paying Kejr. Door wasn't shown by Delhites to Kejri but by EVMs of BJP. Only paid media are paid well for this loose talk but actual every Delhite is regretting.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, KSA

    Thu, May 18 2017

    Ramesh, woh to EVM ki meherbaani thi.

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Chetan Shetty, Kudla

    Wed, May 17 2017

    Bolo feku jhootley ki.....

    DisAgree [9] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • H . Dsouza, KODAGU / MANGALURU

    Wed, May 17 2017

    Jootly V/s Jootmalani , one end with I other with Y!!

    DisAgree [4] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh S, MANGALORE

    Wed, May 17 2017

    "To this, Jethmalani said he used the word on the instruction of Kejriwal.
    However, Anupam Srivastav, advocate on record for Kejriwal since the beginning of the suit, submitted that he had no instruction on the use of the word"..It looks like JET MALANI will make KUJLI bankkrupt..His fees & JEITLEY's defamation will run into crores..

    DisAgree [20] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Amith, USA

    Wed, May 17 2017

    Final winner is : KEJRI-WALL!!! JOOT-can't break WALL!!!

    DisAgree [9] Agree [31] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Kejriwal case: Heated exchanges between Jaitley and Jethmalani in HC



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.