Latest


All Indians originally Hindus, Hinduism's door open to all: RSS' Mohan Bhagwat

  •   Tue, Sep 12 2017 10:25:20 AM

Haridwar, Sep 12 (PTI): RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat on Monday said all Indians were originally Hindus and that the doors of Hinduism are open to all.

He was speaking at Patanjali Yogpeeth where a programme was organised by yoga guru Ramdev on Monday to mark Bhagwat’s birthday.

“We don’t convert people to Hinduisim and we believe that our forefathers, no matter which community we represent today, were Hindus,” the RSS chief said.

“The doors of Hinduism are open to all even today as we believe all of us originally are Hindus,” he said.

Ramdev gifted the RSS chief a mace on his birthday and appealed to him to keep the flame of Hinduism burning.

Earlier in the day, Bhagwat visited the Suratgiri Ashram for a Ganga Arti and to seek the blessings of the saints and seers.

Chief minister Trivendra Singh Rawat also arrived at the ashram to greet him and gifted him a book and a replica of the Kedarnath shrine.

Bhagwat also felicitated the parents of Captain Vikram Batra and Captain Manoj Pandey, who were killed during the 1999 Kargil war, at the ashram.

Uttarakhand assembly speaker Premchand Agrawal, cabinet minister Madan Kaushik and Ashram chief Jagadguru Vishweshwaranand Giri were among those who attended the programme.
  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Flavian dsouza, chik/bengaluru

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Yes agreed ...brahamanas , kshtariya, vysya , sudra ..which one to join

    DisAgree [1] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • KUMAR, KINNIGOLI

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    FIRST ALLOW LOWER CAST PEOPLE TO CONVERT TO UPPER CAST. OR REMOVE CASTE SYSTEM IN HINDUS AND TREAT ALL HINDUS ARE EQUAL.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kiran, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    There were no boundaries before. Hindu is not a religion. People who lived on the banks of Indus valley were called Indu. Persians and other from gulf countries who visited couldn't pronounce Indu so they started calling it Hindu. Before British there was not once country India, there were several states like countries ruled by different dynasties. Britishers made a India what we have today. Though they looted us but we were benefited and united as a country.

    Today these fundamental elements from our own country dividing us again. But its impossible because India is diversified country all should move forward together else it will be disaster.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse

  • prem, moodbidri

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    mithrooooon..... problem DNA mein hai

    DisAgree [5] Agree [32] Reply Report Abuse

  • H.A.Dsouza, Damoh

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    He indirectly vindicating for gharwapsi. He is not concerned for always rape and murder in our country.He is also not condemning what Baba's doing in the name of religion.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [31] Reply Report Abuse

  • Richard Noronha, Belman

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Why do we need a certificate from RSS Mohan bhagvat. Give equal rights for my hindu brothers and sisters . Later let him preach for others

    DisAgree [8] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    India belongs to all and all the people of all religion has the right to live in this country

    DisAgree [2] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • RK, mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Dear Gladson, Brahmavar, You are Indirectly supporting the Argument of Mohan Bhagavath - He always Argues that Bharatha Varsha/Akanda Bharatha was much more bigger than Present India covering Persia to Indoneia.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Namma Nadu, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    MB is speaking of Hindu culture not India.... Meanwhile There was nothing called as Akhand Bharat in history except in Sanghi books...
    Gladson is speaking of how the forefathers of those who practice Bhagwats religion came from ...Meaning they didn't have their origin in present India
    It is a fact .... Only those believing in Akhand bharat can live in denial..

    DisAgree [7] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • RK, mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Hope at least you accept Hindu Culture Exist from Persia to Indonesia When no Other Religion was even born.

    DisAgree [14] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jazz, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    All humans were also monkeys/apes once. So go back to zoos? All welcome?

    DisAgree [9] Agree [32] Reply Report Abuse

  • Langoolacharya., Belman/Wash DC.

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    They still are...look at the comments in Daiji...it speaks for itself, right ??...

    ...JH...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Agee, Indian - UAE

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    There is no harm in promoting religion.... its an individual choice to accept any religion.

    Having said that people shouldn't get fooled by fake babas / preachers... Indians are very much into blind belief..

    DisAgree Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D, QC, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    "blind belief" - You tell that to the current generations!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Aubb, Kuwait

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Bhagawata,
    Did the Dalit caste fall from the skies too.....????

    DisAgree [5] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • MILAN, LUCERNE

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    MOHAN BHAGWAT SHOULD KNOW THAT THE HINDU NAME WAS GIVEN BY ARABS. WHEN THEY CAME TO TRADE IN INDIA. HE SHOULD BE THANKFUL TO ARABS

    DisAgree [8] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • kumar manju, gujrath

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    the word hindu is derived from the arab AL-HIND... hindu is not a religion, the group of people who resided in the banks of river indus (sindhu) called HINDUS... SO THE PEOPLE WHO RESIDE IN THE BANKS OF RIVER INDUS CAN CALL THEMSELVES AS HINDUS & OTHERS?? ( MAY BE YET TO BE NAMES )

    DisAgree [2] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Cyril, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Mohan Bhagwat should learn first to understand the founders from Hinduism and practice before preaching. He should read everyday one chapter from Holy Book of Bhagwat Geeta so that he will be enlightened to follow Hinduism not Gow & Cowism.
    For me it looks like he is inviting all Indians to Gow Cow Vigilism.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • PINTO, Doha/Qatar

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Keep dreaming..

    DisAgree [7] Agree [38] Reply Report Abuse

  • vivek, hirebyle / abu dhabi

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    HINDU is not a religion ......it's a culture.......or civilization......and it was civilization near Indus river (Now in present-day Pakistan)....In fact there was No religion when world Created / Generated.......even if we believe people diverted to other religion because discrimination for people ... specially lower caste ....

    DisAgree [4] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • RK, mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    In the Ramayana, the term Arya can also apply to Raksasas or to Ravana. In several instances, the Vanaras and Raksasas called themselves Arya. The vanara's king Sugriva is called an Arya (Ram: 505102712) and he also speaks of his brother Bali as an Arya (Ram: 402402434). In another instance in the Ramayana, Ravana regards himself and his ministers as Aryas. A logical explanation is that Ravana and his ministers belonged to the highest varna (Ravana being a Brahmin), and Brahmins were generally considered "noble" of deed and hence called Arya (noble). Thus, while Ravana was considered Arya (and regarded himself as such), he was really an Arya because he was noble of deeds. So he is widely considered by Hindus as Arya (Noble Man) - Ravana was South Indian - Srilankan !

    DisAgree [7] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Hussain, Abu Dhabi

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Geographical term for the people who lived beyond the river Indus are known as HINDU. The term 'Hindu' in the ancient records is an ethno-geographical term and did not refer to a religion- WIKIPEDIA

    Yes ..I'm a Hindu, my forefathers were Hindu, BUT.... i follow ISLAM !!
    Problem, haters?????

    DisAgree [8] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangalore/Kuwait

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Shankar,
    I enjoy commenting on various subjects but not about the Creator, Religions and the begenning of Human race. God forbid.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'luru / Kwt

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    It’s inapt to say all Indians were originally Hindus. For instance Indian Parsees, Jews, Anglo Indian Christians and Bohra Muslims in Gujarat were not originally Hindus. Of course majority among the minorities were originally Hindus.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangalore/Kuwait

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    jeevan,

    First of all,
    Know that, it's 'Republic of India' and India is not BJP’s inherited ancestral property.
    Such irrational radical comments sent by people like you, spoils the image of BJP.
    Do you know the meaning of SC/United Nations/UN charter on Human Rights?

    DisAgree [5] Agree [32] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    All those who believe in Adam and Eve theory of origin, please clarify my doubt.
    Adam and Eve formed the first generation. The second generation was their kids. My query is that who are the parents of third generation?

    DisAgree [11] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'luru / Kwt

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    The children married among themselves since God commanded them to grow and fill the earth.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nadeem, Chickmangalore - KSA

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Dear Shankar

    Do you mean they could not have married because they were brothers and sisters? Actually, in the previous versions of Islam (that is, the ancient heavenly messages revealed before last prophet), marriage between brothers and sisters was not banned. God made for every era a different Shari`ah (law) that suits the needs of life on earth, and the stage of development that humanity is at. The Quran says what means:{For each We have appointed a divine law and a traced-out way.} (surah Al Al-Ma’idah 5:48) Scholars said that Hawaa’ (Eve) delivered twins—a boy and a girl—with each pregnancy. Twins were not allowed to marry each other, but they were allowed to marry another brother or sister

    DisAgree [3] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Gladson, Brahmavar

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    A thoroughly misguided and misconstrued view! All Indians were not Hindus. Even the Hindus in India are immigrants, the descendants of Aryans who migrated to India somewhere in 1300 BC. In fact India did not have a religion before Aryans stepped in. The original inhabitants of this land are pre-Dravidians and Tribes. This has been clearly told by the Supreme Court in a 2011 judgment. If it was believed at one time that Dravidians were the original inhabitants of India, that view has since been considerably modified. Now the generally accepted belief is that the pre-Dravidian aborigines, that is, the ancestors of the present tribals or Adivasis (Scheduled Tribes), were the original inhabitants. This is the thesis put forward in a judgment delivered on January 5, 2011 by a Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Justice Markandey Katju and Justice Gyan Sudha Misra. This historical disquisition came in Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2011, arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 10367 of 2010 in Kailas & Others versus State of Maharashtra TR. Taluka P.S. Even the so called language of India Sanskrit is not originally Indian. It came here from the Middle East somewhere near present day Syria. Read history and then make arguments. Here not just Christians or Muslims foreigners but even the Hindus. In fact the first Christians of India were not Hindu converts but group of Jews who had come to India and settled along the Malabar cost in and around 562 BC when their Synagogue was destroyed. First Church in India was built in 57 AD at Thiruvithamcode in Tamil Nadu. This land is of Dravidians and pre-Dravidians who had not religion till Aryans invaded them and forced their beliefs and practices on them. Hence stop misguiding people with distorted facts. Today’s youth have education and burst your myth in seconds Bhagawat.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [40] Reply Report Abuse

  • RK, mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    You meant to say that nothing/Nobody is original in India... every thing/Everyone came from Syria, Rome and Middle East ...

    DisAgree [15] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Gladson, Brahmavar

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Pre-Dravidians, Tribes and their practices are original. Rest all invaders here including Aryans who forcefully converted the Dravidians and made them to accept their beliefs and religion. The founding language of the family from which Sanskrit is from is called Proto-Indo-European. Its daughter is a language called Proto-Indo-Iranian, so called because it is the origin of the languages of North India and Iran

    The, well, encyclopedic, Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, edited by JP Mallory and DQ Adams, writes of the earliest speakers of Proto-Indo-Iranian emerging in the southern Urals and Kazakhstan. These steppe people, representing what is called the Andronovo culture, first appear just before 2000 BC.

    From this Central Asian homeland diverged a group of people who had now stopped speaking Proto-Indo-Iranian and were now conversing in the earliest forms of Sanskrit. Some of these people moved west towards what is now Syria and some east towards the region of the Punjab in India.

    David Anthony writes that the people who moved west were possibly employed as mercenary charioteers by the Hurrian kings of Syria. These charioteers spoke the same language and recited the same hymns that would later on be complied into the Rig Veda by their comrades who had ventured east.

    These Rigvedic Sanskrit speakers usurped the throne of their employers and founded the Mitanni kingdom. While they gained a kingdom, the Mitanni soon lost their culture, adopting the local Hurrian language and religion. However, royal names, some technical words related to chariotry and of course the gods Indra, Varuna, Mitra and the Nasatyas stayed on.

    The group that went east and later on composed the Rig Veda, we know, had better luck in preserving their culture. The language and religion they bought to the subcontinent took root. So much so that 3,500 years later, modern Indians would celebrate the language of these ancient pastoral nomads all the way out in Bangkok city

    DisAgree [4] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'luru / Kwt

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Mr. RK, Mangalore,
    Who said nobody is original in India? The Dravidians in the south are original inhabitants of the country. In our coastal region, the Konkani speaking Catholics from Goa to Mangalore and Tulu / Kannada speaking Protestants were originally Hindus. While the Catholics were converted by the Portuguese, the Protestants were converted by the German and British missionaries.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • jl, mumbai

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    YOU ARE 100% RIGHT.

    Dravidians who are mostly south Indians are original inhabitants and aryans of so called sanghi mentality came later.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [35] Reply Report Abuse

  • Satya, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    There was nothing Sanghi before the middle of the 20th Century when a bunch of losers who were sharing the bed with the colonial masters started an organization or disease to scuttle the freedom struggle. Now they claim a nation which was established by the blood and sweat of the freedom fighters as theirs and are trying to impose their narrow minded, divisive, fascist ideology on the whole country.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kishore, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    I pity at the statement made by Mohan Bhagwath and his lack of knowledge.Many Indians may be originally Hindus but not all of them. There was considerable settlement of Persians and Arabs in India when during the medieval period. This settlement is either due to trade or foreign invasions. these Persians and Arabs were not Hindus but they settled in India. like wise during Greek invasion many came to India crossing Indu Kush mountains and out of theses some went back and many settled in India especially in north western frontier provinces. likewise Chinese also settled in India in two communities with separate origins and settlement. One is of immigrants from China and Indian-born people of Chinese ancestry and the other is of expatriate Chinese living in India for terms of usually 2–3 years.The immigrant community started centuries ago and became more prominent in the late 18th century with arrivals working at the ports in Calcutta and Madras, and has gone on to contribute to the social and economic life of Kolkata through manufacturing and trade of leather products and running Chinese restaurants.] The community numbers about 4,000 with around 2,000 living in Kolkata and 400 families in Mumbai, where there are Chinatowns. Like wise different cults have settled in India whose forefathers were not Hindus. there is one small tribal community called siddi in Uttara Kannada / North Canara district of Karnataka. They migrated from Africa during colonial period. Therefore, the claim that all Indians were originally Hindus does not hold any water. More over, Aryans also Migrated from central Asia and when they migrated there were not Hindus. Kindly don't spread false and fake theories in order to suit your ideology.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [35] Reply Report Abuse

  • Satya, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Exactly. It is like the immigrants in the USA today claiming to be original Americans............ It would have been better if he had said that only Dravidans are original Indians. The rest are all migrants.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Manglore/Kuwait

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Is there a special 'Heaven' (Hell will be common) for Hinduism ?
    People are breking their head for nothing.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • PRAVEEN, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    If i call come to Hinduism.shall i get Bramin cast ?? oh no..i would like to take up dalit category..lods of reservation....

    DisAgree [6] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • ca girishkk, m'lore/dxb

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    I m little confused....,

    Let me quote in to to - " .... all Indians originally Hindus, Hinduism's door open to all", ...... here in this statement "originally means what....?" means there may be FEKU also...!!!!

    I have a doubt.., can Desi Hindu's who export/sell beef also can join RSS..., just an out of the box thought..!!!!

    jh
    jai hind...,

    DisAgree [10] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • RK, mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    The evidence against Adam and Eve existing has caused many Christians to move away from a literal interpretation and belief in the Genesis creation narrative to an allegorical approach, while others continue to believe in what they see as fundamental doctrines of the Christian faith. In particular the evidence for their non-existence casts doubt on original sin and the origin and nature of evil.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jeevan, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    A true Hindu will never eat non-Veg. No Hindus should eat non veg. By 2022 I hope Bjp will ban non veg completely. For all.

    DisAgree [61] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Satya, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Read the vedas, and get enlightened.............I don't think you are a true hindu, or know much about Hinduism. In every comment of yours you rant about veg and non veg. Eat as much grass as you want, but don't try to impose your senseless ideas on the rest of mankind..

    DisAgree [3] Agree [62] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, KSA

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Dear Satya, leave him alone. He is under treatment and by our prayers, he will recover soon.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdul jabbar, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    ROFL

    DisAgree Agree [2] Report Abuse

  • H.A.Dsouza, Damoh

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Jeevan
    For your kind information, sea is the largest food suppliers to humanity. If all follow vegetarianism there will be shortage of food. About 30% of land cannot grow enough food for entire populations.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, Kundapur/Qatar

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    so what mr. bhagwat?
    why someone leave his religion and embrace other religion? no faith in one's own religion?
    why you can't attract people who embrace other religion without force?
    first of all hinduism is pool of religion, those who are staying in india and other side of indus river called hindi, even in most of arab countries we people are called by hindi .

    DisAgree [1] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Roshan, Mangalore / Abudhabi

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Mohan Baghwat should open the door of his heart to come out all dirty spoiled filthy emotions which is filled inside.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangalore/Kuwait

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Under Modi's rule, all the pre-historic roots of Hinduism and other visions are brought to lights by some sages.
    Talk something sensible in view of present world and people's well being.
    Did God create all such religions? It'shuman made. What ever our religions, we need to live with fear and faith in God. There would not be any special reservations in 'Heaven' on the basis of different religious practices.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    There is no such thing as heaven. It is also the child of imaginations of the same human beings who created religion and respective Gods!!

    DisAgree [14] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, KSA

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Shankar Anna, I would like to refrain from arguing on God, Heaven, Hell and religion. For me, no religion is bad. People molded its principles and doctrines as per their convenience and for their benefits. Like mother Theresa said "I convert a Hindu to be a good Hindu, Muslim to be a good Muslim and Christian a good Christian". Being a Christian if I do all bad things and if a non-christian do every good thing, I am sure God will be pleased with non-christian more than with Christian. Leaders with little knowledge of their on religion speak anything senseless and live their royal life. Only one thing is sure that we all are creation of one God.

    DisAgree Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed, Bangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Are we fools to worship the Creations than the Creator? Are we fools to practice Polytheism than Monotheism?? We have received Guidance (Hidayah) and hence forth there is no point even thinking of anything else, be it at a knife point.

    DisAgree [22] Agree [41] Reply Report Abuse

  • Satya, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    So what? For Mohan Bhagwat it must be recently acquired gyaan, but the rest of the world knows it already.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [31] Reply Report Abuse

  • Daniel, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    ......Bhagwat gi aap sirf "BhagwaT" hain, "BhagwaN" nahin!!!!!
    If Ok then please provide proof reference o/w agree as originally from Adam and Eve which 3/4th of the world population agree based on proof references.
    Now on stop hijacking the out great Hinduism for your selfish motives.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse

  • Comman, Man

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Are adam & hawa belongs to hindu..?? He need some treatment from international hospital

    DisAgree [16] Agree [39] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    All are descendants of Adam & Eve ...

    DisAgree [20] Agree [73] Reply Report Abuse

  • Hindu, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    First of all keep open the doors of all temples for all established Hindus and then call others to join

    DisAgree [7] Agree [64] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed K.C., Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Hindu,
    you are right, they should first allow all present day Hindus to enter the temple door which he has kept open.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdul Rauf, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    Well said Jossey..I am with you...

    DisAgree [9] Agree [50] Reply Report Abuse

  • JJ, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 12 2017

    History and Science says we evolved from Apes or Monkey's and so on. So as per Shri Mohan Baghwat we should go back to the Jungles. Unfortunately most of the Jungles are chopped off.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: All Indians originally Hindus, Hinduism's door open to all: RSS' Mohan Bhagwat



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.

You might also like