Latest


Bengaluru woman gets talaq on WhatsApp from husband of 15 years

  •   Sat, Dec 29 2018 10:21:36 AM

Daijiworld Media Network – Bengaluru (DC)

Bengaluru, Dec 29: Despite Supreme Court denouncing the unconstitutional practice, USA based surgeon from Bengaluru, gave triple talaq to his wife of 15 years through WhatsApp text and audio.

Javeed Khan who is married to Reshma Azeez kept on abusing her, as per her complaint. "He started abusing me emotionally and kept insulting me. He never asked for a legal divorce but kept asking me to leave. In the initial days of the marriage, we lived UK and then moved to the US. Last month, he brought me back to Bengaluru. He later went back to the US, taking all my documents along. He wanted to resolve the issues between us after speaking with the families," Reshma said in her complaint.

"Once we reached, he left with his family, while I was stranded at the airport. He had taken away my passport, academic certificates and other identity cards. On December 4, a day after I filed the police complaint, he sent me talaq on WhatsApp," she added.

The couple has two kids, aged 13 and 10 who continue to live with Khan in Illinois, while he has cut off all communication with Reshma.

"I speak to my children through their school staff now," she said.

"TALAQ I am sending this message in my full sense and I am not under any influence of anger or intoxication. ALLAH as my witness. I, Dr. JAVEED KHAN (dob 01/19/1976), son of late Taj Ahmed pronounce TALAQ (Divorce) to RESHMA AZEEZ (dob 12/06/1978), daughter of Mr. Azeezuddin, according to ISLAMIC LAW OF SHARIAH, Meher has been completely fulfilled [sic]," is the last message from Javeed, which was also sent to their family group.

The officer who took up the case said that the accused was out of the country when his wife lodged the complaint. He said that the investigations will continue with cooperation from airport officials.

On Thursday, the Lok Sabha passed the Triple Talaq Bill, aimed to make the Triple Talaq a criminal offence with a jail term of upto three years for the husband.
  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Muhammed Mangaluru, Mangaluru

    Sun, Dec 30 2018

    If at all he gaves talaq or divorce is there any way they will live together again ??? No right than why our so called communal party BJP is giving soo much of importance to one religion.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • somein, manglore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Parliament has passed a bill to stop triple talaq at one instant. But after lot of opposition from people, who should really be concerned. Why? The Government is being criticised for this step. Do we still want our daughters to be deserted thus? If we want progress, we should support policies beneficial to the public. People also point out several other practices by people belonging to other religions. Let us wait, the Governament with support of people will also abolish these practices also

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • SMR, Karkala

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    The Supreme Court has ruled that the marriage doesn’t get annulled as a result of pronouncement of Triple Talaq. The holy Quran of Muslims in Chapter 'Nisa' and 'Bakra' exclusively in detail laid down the codification.
    Any bill needs to become law has to be President of India's signatures or passed both houses of the parliament. In this case, the simple voice vote to make law bypassing the 'Muslim personal law' and constitution of India does not annul the marriage in the first case.
    The Doctor who may have an American Passport may not get punished but his religion of Islam gives both the party to break the contract.
    It is unfortunate that 15 years of marriage is coming to an end with a single message that might have saved with an intervention of elders or following the basic principles of Quran teaching of 90 days with separate 'Talaq' pronouncement.
    Jai Hind

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Rita, Germany

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Whatever indifferences were there in thier marraige life,it was but not good what he did .coming to India without children,leaving back his wife in airport ,going back taking with her personal identitaet like passport ,her academic papers,etc,.why this cruelitatet?Afterall he lived with her 15years,had two children.Now is she for him a old thing?Is there a new youngblood is sicht?with all academic grades,he is still not worth to be called doctor.Atleast mother can be given a chance to talk to her children official without help from school teachers.why should be children deprived from mother before they reach the age of adolescent.?He is not human and respect los.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    In 1968, a person, from Gujarat, aged 18 years (born 1950), married a woman at her age of 16. Even the current CM of Gujarat knows him. I don't know why the law abiding Sriman Modiji has not succeeded in bring that person under law for marrying a minor.

    DisAgree [12] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Imtiaz Ahmed, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Unless we know the truth we cannot comment. Suppose the wife was involved in an extra marital relationship then will any Husband would wish to keep such a Wife. Naturally any Husband would divorce such a wife. In such a case innocent Husband has to go to jail. Triple talak law has not been looked into from all angles. Whoever has made is surely an insane person.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @Imtiyaz,

    Brother, this is not Triple talaq case. The husband has iterated just first of 3 talaqs before the divorce is valid. It is clear from the whatsapp message of husband. Has he mentioned triple talaq anywhere in the message?

    DisAgree [4] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev Kumar, Mangalore/New Delhi

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Why did Dr.Javed Khan took passport academic certificates ID cards...when he already pronounced talaq. When you cut-off all relationship with begum...why you carry all the necessity things which not belonged to you. It's an big offence. A well to do educated guy do such thing is beyond imagination. Now Reshma cannot able to do nikkah with javed once again unless and until she marry-off first to other guy. So cruel act..cannot foreseen in any other religions. They rule womens in the name of religion.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [37] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @Dev Kumar,

    Please don't give twisted facts to fool the innocent people; and to portray that men legitimately rule women in the name of religion.
    How come is it true that the men rule women, when the permission of the lady is "The Must" before the Remarriage.? It is not that the husband can remarry her ex wife as and when he wishes to do so.

    With Regards to the condition of Remarriage (that the ex wife becomes unlawful for Remarraige until another man has married her and then they have been divorced); note that, in one way, this rule is being put in place to avoid any of the couple giving divorce and using it as a threatening tool to get the desired things get done to remarry again. And also, this rule avoids the couple taking divorce lightly.

    In any case there is no "force factor" involved in remarriage when the permission of both the parties is " a must".

    DisAgree [24] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @Dev Kumar,
    Do you still want Reshma to marry Javed?. How cruel?

    DisAgree [18] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @Dev Kumar,

    Regarding your concern for the condition of re- marriage with ex husband; let me clarify you something by giving an example.

    For the sake of argument, let us assume that the wife was given divorce, which she did not deserve. So why should that wife prefer to remarry with her ex husband by leaving the current husband? Where is the question of men ruling women come to the fore?

    DisAgree [17] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kishore Kumar, Mangaluru

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    ... and this orthodox doctor uses Whataspp media owned by a Jew for talaq.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • mahesh, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    This is why the Jail term was added in the law, so that in the fear of the Jail term they dont do it.
    Looks these deterents arent still working.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @mahesh,

    REALLY?
    How this case is different from the case where a husband just abandons his wife even without any notice? Don't you know anyone who did exactly the same thing? What punishment you asked for for that person?

    DisAgree [25] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sanjay, Hebri

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Nawaz.. simple did the women file complaint in that case? Whatever happened there was mutual. Who are you to raise concern about that?

    DisAgree [13] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @Sunjay,

    Why can't you ask same question to your Srimanji, when your Srimanji is unnecessarily so concerned about other's issues? If he is concerned about other's, why shouldn't I concerned about other's issues?

    DisAgree [16] Agree [9] Report Abuse

  • Maria, Moodbidri

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    This guy looks very religious, he must have thought he landed in Pakistan after flying from America . Give him maxmum punishment for his cruelty.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [35] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sanjay, Hebri

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    3 years for the crime.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Syed, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Why one year for dowry case
    Double standard

    DisAgree [7] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shainaz javed shaikh, Mumbai

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Only Instant tripple talaq is punishable!
    This seems to be the first one, and there is waiting period of three months, and they can do patch up, and continue to be couple. If no patch up happens in waiting period of e months, then actual separation takes place.
    The bill passed in parliment is for INSTANT TRIPPLE TALAQ!

    DisAgree [2] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • sandeep, dubai

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Talaq not in the picture anymore, let him go to Court & file the divorce, else let him face the consequence.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @Sandeep,
    This is not Nepal.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Report Abuse

  • Nasir, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Whatsup talaq unacceptable .if you not intrest give stright way to talaq.dont give like bachali

    DisAgree [4] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse

  • Don, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Divorce should be avoided at all cost, and should be exercised only when all options and each and every avenues have been fully exploited and have failed.

    However, it is best if the peoples of their respective communities sit down in earnest and safeguard the interests of all concerned, leaving room for reconciliation.

    DisAgree Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    there was no WhatsApp in 1968 ...

    DisAgree [11] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kumar, Kinnigoli

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    1968 - PANANDE PAAR.......TREND...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Some Idiots have still not not understood why 1968 ...

    DisAgree [20] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Prashant Karkera, Hejamady/Mumbai

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    You are the only genius in this universe, 1968 is the year Narendra Damodardas Modi was married to Jasodaben when both were minors ....

    DisAgree [4] Agree [10] Report Abuse

  • Haneef, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    You’re wrong mr jossey! Internet was ther before the Ramayan happened so there was WhatsApp in other name and Americans stole this technology fro innocent Indians and changed the name .

    DisAgree [11] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kishore Kumar, Mangaluru

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    ...... just like the destruction of World Trade Centre by Jews.
    ha ha ha

    DisAgree [3] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Deva, Pilar

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    " On Thursday, the Lok Sabha passed the Triple Talaq Bill, aimed to make the Triple Talaq a criminal offence with a jail term of upto three years for the husband " this newly passed Bill/Law must be applied to Doctor Khan and government must bring him back to face Indian Law.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse

  • G R PRABHUJI, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Talay or leaving wife after marriage is wrong . Not only in Muslims but also in all religious. They must be punished.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [36] Reply Report Abuse

  • P Shetty, Udupi

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    yes, it is punishable to all in law. Some women don't file a case and drag their husband to court. that is different issue. Even SC said deserting old parents is also punishable.

    DisAgree Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sanjay, Hebri

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    Agreed, but the offended wife like in this case, must file complaint. If husband and wife mutually agreed to stay away, others should not have any problems.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Udupi

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    what is the use of keeping 'Ji' in the name when one cant dare to call spade a spade and condemn this man's act... LOL. yes, some men leave their wifes be it hindus or xtians.. but then the society does not approve it and that man will face questions and embarassment. But here the society will be behind this rogue, why becsceu the religion has sactioned him.. that is diference Mr G.

    DisAgree Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Udupi/ Kuwait

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    @Rajesh,

    Have you really questioned your Sriman Feku "Ji"?

    DisAgree [5] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Udupi

    Sat, Dec 29 2018

    when did he addressed himself as "Ji" in his name?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bengaluru woman gets talaq on WhatsApp from husband of 15 years



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.

You might also like