Priyanka's entry refuels debate on dynastic politics


New Delhi, Jan 24 (IANS): Priyanka Gandhi's formal debut in politics has re-ignited a fierce debate on political dynasties and opinion is sharply divided if family lineage is a slur or works as a spur in public life.

Going by the success rate of leaders with family roots, it seems that political upbringing does help in para-drop launches of electoral careers, proving that dynasties have paradoxical existence in democracies.

The newest member of the Gandhi family has walked onto the political turf carrying a legacy of five generations but no political party except perhaps the Communist bloc can claim to be dynasty-free.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose ordinary tea-seller image had a mojo effect in last elections, has often mocked political families. But he has not been able to get rid of what is often considered to be a menace in his own party even though ordinary backgrounds of their leaders are routinely projected as a unique selling proposition of the ruling brigade.

Even a cursory look at the composition of the current Lok Sabha gives away the family roots of many politicians who are popular faces.

Among the second generation leaders include newly appointed interim Finance Minister Piyush Goyal, the son of the late BJP Treasurer Ved Prakash Goyal. In fact, there are many young BJP MPs who have taken over the baton from their fathers.

Anurag Thakur from Himachal Pradesh is the son of former state Chief Minister Prem Kumar Dhumal. Poonam Mahajan, the MP from Mumbai North Central, carries forward the legacy of her late father Pramod Mahajan, who was one of the most influential Ministers in the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government.

Union Minister Maneka Gandhi and her son Varun Gandhi, though extension of the Gandhi lineage, hold the BJP flag in Parliament. Minister of State for Home Kiran Rijiju is the son of Rinchin Kharu, who was the first pro-tem speak of Arunachal Pradesh.

The problem in Congress is at another level. Under the umbrella Gandhi dynasty, there are several sub-families.

Jyotiraditya Scindia from Madhya Pradesh is the son of late Madhavrao Scindia, Sachin Pilot is the son of late Rajesh Pilot and Sushmita Dev is the daughter of late Santosh Mohan Dev.

Apart from the two principal parties, dynasty is the basic foundation of most of the regional players who run their organisations as fiefdom.

The Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh represents Mulayam Singh Yadav's clan. The Badals in Punjab drive Shiromani Akali Dal (Badal) and Shiv Sena is synonymous with the Thackeray family. Abdullahs are leading the National Conference while the PDP is led by the Mufti clan in Jammu and Kashmir. The late M. Karunanidhi's son M.K Stalin spearheads the DMK. Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik is the son of the legendary Biju Patnaik.

The clan culture prevails across the board, covering the entire Indian political spectrum.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Deva, Pilar

    Thu, Jan 24 2019

    Dynasty , caste,color or Religion we don't care, we want clean & Qualified PM for our Great Country..

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Kudla Stories, Kudla

    Thu, Jan 24 2019

    For the past many years these guys have only one issue to attack Congress. Dynasty. And the below the belt accusations on Sonia Gandhi and others. Why do you guys stoop to such levels. You want to argue a case, do it, but why personal attacks.

    Shows your true mentality

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Jennifer, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 24 2019

    Who finds a problem with dynasty politics ? I am sure not BJP. Because, if they had a problem, Maneka and her son would have been taken Sanyas than being the very party that taunts dynasty !

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Satya, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 24 2019

    Only fools and losers keep harping about dynastic politics in democracies where leaders have to be elected by the people and cannot be foisted upon. If they are not liked they will be dumped.

    One cannot deny the right to children of politicians/leaders to enter politics or make a career out of it. Even in other democracies like the US, Canada, Mauritius, Bangla Desh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Singapore the children of former leaders have led or are leading their countries. Nobody asks questions there. In the US members of the some family have been serving as senators for 5-6 generations. Therefore why so much fuss in India.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Jan 24 2019

    This article never mentioned about Father & son Gowdas.
    Let PM read this article and make some U-Turn moves for which he is well known.
    Such a huge 56 " personality keeps worrying about a lady. This is just the beginning.
    Let us see who will win the political race, Modi’s twisting tongue with the roar of a lion or Priyanka’s charismatic looks & vision and soft spoken but effective language.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Thu, Jan 24 2019

    I have listened to her election speeches. She is a genuine person and makes all the right noises. Go for it Priyanka! We require a break from jumlas and empty advertising of the Chaiwala feku!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Priyanka's entry refuels debate on dynastic politics



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.