Yeddy Not to Challenge Governor’s Return of Akrama-Sakrama Proposal


Yeddy Not to Challenge Governor’s Return of Akrama-Sakrama Proposal
From Our Special Correspondent
Daijiworld Media Network

Bangalore, Jan 14: Better sense seems to have prevailed on the B S Yeddyurappa-led BJP regime in relunctantly but gracefully accepting Karnataka governor H R Bhardwaj’s rejection of the state government’s proposal for bringing an ordinance for regularisation of unauthorised constructions and housing layouts and violation of building bylaws under the Akrama-Sakrama scheme.

The Yeddyurappa regime, which had been dilly-dallying with the proposal since it came to power, had finally decided to come out with the ordinance on the eve of the model code of conduct for elections to the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) or Greater Bangalore civic body scheduled for February 21.

But the governor, a Congress nominee who had served as Union Law Minister under the first edition of Congress-led UPA regime, had refused to bow to the Yeddyurappa regime’s request to promulgate the ordinance and advised the government to get the proposal thoroughly discussed in both houses of the state legislature.

The ruling BJP, which was hoping to capitalise on the Akrama-Sakrama scheme to earn electoral dividends from a large section of the Bangaloreans, was stung by the Raj Bhavan’s refusal to accede to its request to bring out the ordinance.

An influential section of the ruling party, including several senior ministers, were understood to have seriously advocated that the state cabinet should submit the ordinance to Raj Bhavan for the second time for consideration in a bid to compel the governor to accept it. The chief minister is also believed to have been toying with the idea of making the return of the ordinance an electoral issue and seek to blame the opposition parties for coming in the way of helping the people. However, saner elements within the ruling party had suggested that the government should go in for confrontation as it might turn out to be counter-productive.

Karnataka’s transport minister R Ashok met the Governor late on Thursday night to prevail upon him to give his assent to the ordinance as the BBMP poll code of conduct comes into force from Friday. He blamed the Opposition for stalling the ``pro-people’’ policy of the government.

Ashok said he was pained at the governor’s decision. The future of the proposal would be decided after consultations with the chief minister

The minister, who is also the district in-charge for Bangalore Urban, said the government had decided to implement the scheme through the ordinance as it could not table a Bill on the scheme in the State Legislature during the winter session on account of disruptions in the proceedings of the house by the Opposition.

The state cabinet had taken a decision on implementation of the scheme, he said pointing out that the proposal was not prepared in a hurry.

But, the governor, who spoke to reporters at a function after participating in the inaugural session of a summit on corporate governance organised by the Institute of Directors, said he had returned the ordinance as the government cannot ``bypass’’ the legislature and judiciary.

He said he had asked the government to debate the proposed legislation in the legislature and come back to him after the BBMP elections.

"Do you expect me to bypass legislature and judiciary and do something which I don’t know at all. So, I told them to debate it and come back to me after the (BBMP) elections, "he said in an obvious reference to the legal complexities involved in the ordinance.

The governor pointed out that an effort to enact legislation on regularisation scheme had started in 2004 itself and that it had been returned by the then governor T N Chaturvedi.

"Then they (Government) took three years to rectify and then the legislation was passed. But it was challenged before the Karnataka High Court, which has stayed the legislation,’’ he explained.

The Opposition parties too have taken exception to the haste in which the government is trying to seek assent for the ordinance on the Akrama-Sakrama scheme just before the BBMP polls. Several Opposition leaders have alleged that the government is trying to take political mileage from the scheme ahead of the polls.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Abdul Latif, Surathkal

    Sat, Jan 16 2010

    Yeddy, only now talking like battery-operated teddy bear that is given for children. No Guts against biggest Real Estate Mafia operated by the corrupt, greedy, cunning "REDDY BROTHERS". What a eyewash govt in Karnataka. Jai ho!

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • ISMAIL K PERINJE, PERINJE/YANBU-KSA

    Sat, Jan 16 2010

    The motive of the ordinance is to help the have not, but the timing and the way of "Ordinance" get passed not augur well for the real meaning "DEVELOPMENT"of Karnataka Mr Nagesh.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • ansar, mangalore

    Sat, Jan 16 2010

    Every party trying to take political mileage instead of finalise the akrama sakrama matter. my kind request to the governor please finalise this matter as soon as possible. people are suffering from years to solve this matter.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Lancelot N Tauro, Mangalore/Doha Qatar

    Sat, Jan 16 2010

    Mr. NN (nagesh nayak), AKRAMA-SANKRAMA-VIKRMA all these DRAMA just to gain power for coming Bangalore municipal elections. What about Distributions of FLOOD RELIEF FUND, chapter closed?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Roshan, Mangalore

    Sat, Jan 16 2010

    Akrama-Sakrama serves only political purpose to gain votes and detrimental to the planed development of Bangalore City. BJP's development vision is limited to development of own pockets. Why then most of the BDA plots allocated to MLA and MP's, instead of soldiers? What happened to the proposed tax on mining? The only thing which is innovative with BJP is they have marketing their own selfish personal wealth development as State Development. To that effect I appreciate their marketing technique.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Sudhir, Mangalore

    Fri, Jan 15 2010

    Our system is really funny. one day one person will be law minister, next day he is will be governor and very next day again he will be a minister of party(like SM Krishna). Governor & president post should be given to such people who should not have any connection with the party once they resume duty & after that they should not be allowed to join any party.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur, Puttur/ Mangalore

    Fri, Jan 15 2010

    Dear Mr. Nagesh Nayak when bjp (nda) took power in the center the first decision they took was to replace all the governors to listen to bjp only why do you know to oppose any development visions of congress ruled states. As an opposition leader Mr. Yeddyurappa opposed all the developmental works of non-bjp rule in the state now he is crying for development? What development 24 our power supply? Dear Mr. Nagesh Nayak when bjp (nda) took power in the center the first decision they took was to replace all the governors to listen to bjp only why do you know to oppose any development visions of congress ruled states. As an opposition leader Mr. Yeddyurappa opposed all the developmental works of non-bjp rulers in the state now he is crying for development? What development 24 our power supply?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • nagesh nayak, bangalore

    Fri, Jan 15 2010

    GOVERNOR( EX LAW MINISTER) IS A CONGRESSMAN & DEFINATELY OPPOSE BJP'S DEVELOPMENT VISION. HE WILL LISTEN ONLY CONGRESS & JDS MEN. JAI HO.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Shenoy, dubai

    Fri, Jan 15 2010

    I am disapponited to see whats happening in Our state from all sides . Total dishonesty & opportuinism frm from all sides . Poor Yeddy !!. One Door HDK is waiting(congress Looks Like has told him we will take care about Yeddy .You do not hastly do anything), other door Cogress is waiting(Not Directly but through obvious channels!!).Third door is very dangerous tiger where reddy is waiting that too with the blessing of Central leaders.

    This door is very dangerous In politics either U must be a clean man so that you can through your resignation on the face of corrupt representatives (Example clean VP Singh) Or a capable Leader who can control the ministers(RK Hegde from nowhere became a top leader in Karnatka with superb administration & develpment. Deve Gowda,HDK & SM Krishna are other good examples for developments) or a clean & able man with displined party (For example our PM Mr Singh in current displined congess). With none above with half baked honesty its very difficult to survive. No dobubt yeddy is a good man with no voice in a highly corrupt filled ministry.

    If he raises voice against Reddy, Yeddy will fall next day! He has support only good for nothing ministers from Udupi & few opportunistic ministers who defected from JD(S) for the sake of Power. Despite this he is empty. Unless Yeddy changes his style this poor good man will be bullied from all angles from top to bottom .I honestly sympathise this indivitual But not his communal party.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • R. Shetty, Mangalore/Sharjah

    Fri, Jan 15 2010

    Who authorised legaly elected members and the government to legalize the illigal activity. If a government can change the illegal status to legal status for the sake of an electoral benifit how can we call this government is a legal government?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur, Puttur/ Mangalore

    Fri, Jan 15 2010

    I appreciate governors ruling by returning back the proposal moved by Mr. Yeddyurappa on akrama sakrama. Really need extensive discussions in both the houses of the representatives.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Yeddy Not to Challenge Governor’s Return of Akrama-Sakrama Proposal



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.