In a first, SC passes divorce decree through video conferencing


New Delhi, Jun 20 (IANS): In a first, the Supreme Court has allowed a petition seeking divorce by mutual consent through video conferencing.

Justice V Ramasubramanian said "The marriage solemnized between the parties on May 31, 2001, shall stand dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. All the proceedings pending before all courts between the parties shall stand closed/ disposed of/quashed in terms of the settlement agreement."

The court exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution and passed the decree for the dissolution of the marriage. "Under the terms of the settlement, a joint application has been made by the parties in praying for a decree of dissolution of marriage by mutual consent by invoking jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution" noted the court.

The court said that since the entire payment as recorded in the settlement agreement has been paid, the parties have no further or other obligations against each other.

The court observed that under the terms of the settlement, a sum of Rs.57, 50,000 was liable to be paid by the husband to the wife. "The counsel for the respondent (husband) states that the entire amount has been paid. This is also confirmed by the counsel for the petitioner (wife). The petitioner and the respondent are also present through the video conferencing. The petitioner confirmed the receipt of the entire amount", said the court.

The petitioner moved the top court urging it to transfer divorce proceedings pending in the family court in Telangana to the District and Sessions Court in Kolkata. However, the matter was referred to the top court mediation centre, where the parties arrived at an amicable settlement and prayed for termination of the marriage. "The Supreme Court Mediation Centre conducted mediation and the parties have now reached to an amicable settlement", said the court, citing the settlement agreement on November 5, 2019.

The parties, in the 2019 agreement, said by signing this agreement the parties solemnly state and affirm that they have no further claims or demands against each other and all the disputes and differences have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the process of mediation.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • smr, Karkala

    Sat, Jun 20 2020

    There are 59,867 cases pending in the Supreme Court, and 44.75 lakh cases in various high courts. And 5 key cases of Citizenship (Amendment) Act, Article 370, Rights vs Faith (Sabarimala case), Use of money bill route and Creamy layer in Supreme Court is still pending.

    Over 1,000 cases are pending in courts across the country for 50 years, while a whopping two lakh plus cases are pending for 25 years.
    But our honorable court feels 'Ghar ka mamla' has much more priority than interest of the nation.

    Jai Hind

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Jun 20 2020

    We cannot trust Jio Internet ...

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Charles D'Mello, Pangala

    Sat, Jun 20 2020

    If both parties agree for a divorce by mutual agreement, what is the role of court...!!!!???? Courts are loaded with other issues which may take another 100 years to settle.

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: In a first, SC passes divorce decree through video conferencing



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.