Bigamy irrational, unconstitutional; strike it down: Plea in SC


New Delhi, Dec 4 (IANS): A plea has been moved in the Supreme Court seeking to declare the practice of bigamy unconstitutional, oppressive towards women and opposed to equality.

The petition, filed by five individuals through advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, has urged the apex court to issue a direction to strike down section 2 of Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 in so far it recognises the system of bigamy/ polygamy prevalent in Muslim community.

"A second marriage solemnised by a Hindu, Christian or Parsi during the lifetime of his spouse would be punishable under Section 494 of IPC but at the same time, such marriage is not punishable if conducted by a Muslim. Therefore, Section 494 is making discrimination only on the basis of religion, which is perse in violation of Article 14 and 15(1) of the Constitution", said the plea.

It contended that bigamy is irrational, illogical, discriminatory and oppressive for women and affects her life and liberty and hits Article 21 of the Constitution.

The plea has argued that in India the irony is that bigamy has been made punishable under Section 494 of IPC subject to applicability of personal law. "The question is as to whether state can make criminal law in such a manner which may create discrimination and same act may be punishable for someone but for others enjoyable," said the plea.

The plea submitted that penal action cannot be differentiated on the basis of religious practice and penal law has to be made applicable uniformly having no relation with personal law applicable to the offender. The plea cited that bigamy is not prevalent amongst Hindus, Christians and Parsis and is only recognised by Muslim community.

The petitioners alleged that the women are worst sufferers due to solemnising marriage or marriages by her husband and she is bound to lead life like a slave.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Raj, Mangalore

    Sun, Dec 06 2020

    Sanctifying cows is irrational. Will the Supreme Court prohibit the holy cow?

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D, QC, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Fri, Dec 04 2020

    very strong arguments to strike down this discrimination based on religious personal law. But it does not go far enough as the charge of bigamy can be avoided by divorce where triple talaq is banned by law, and repeated divorces so that marriage becomes just a legal façade not just in Islam but in other religions as well.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Veer, Nagpur

    Fri, Dec 04 2020

    This is more sensible and humane than Love-Jihad. At the same time there is no scope for one sided triple talaaq as and when convenient. In marriage both partners should have equal rights and say or else don't marry at all.

    DisAgree Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Charles D'Mello, Pangala

    Fri, Dec 04 2020

    Yes. I think that in India there must be one common rule.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bigamy irrational, unconstitutional; strike it down: Plea in SC



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.