Court Decision on Disputed Ayodhya Land in September


Lucknow, Jul 26 (IANS): A special bench of the Allahabad High Court Monday concluded the hearing related to ownership of a disputed land in Ayodhya to which Hindus and Muslims have made rival claims for over a century. The decision is likely to be delivered in September.

While Hindus claim the land to be the site of the birthplace of their revered deity Lord Ram, Muslims have asserted their right over the same as the site of a 16th century mosque claimed to have been built by the first Mughal emperor Babur in the ancient town of Ayodhya, about 120 km from here.

The three-judge special bench comprising Justice S.U. Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice Dharam Veer Sharma, reserved the judgement, indicating that it will announce the verdict in the second week of September.

The contentious litigation has been going on before different courts for nearly 125 years.

The final arguments which started Monday morning, continued till about 7 p.m. As many as 54 witnesses appeared before the court on behalf of the Hindus while the Muslims presented 33 witnesses over the past two decades.

Interestingly, the first suit was filed before a local court in Faizabad as early as Jan 19, 1885 when the plaintiff, Raghubar Das, sought rights over the 'Ram Chabootra' - a raised platform in front of the Babri Mosque, which was demolished by right wing Hindu activists Dec 6, 1992.

A petition in this regard came up before the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court in 1955.

In July 1989, Babri Masjid Action Committee (BMAC) convenor Zafaryab Jilani opposed a plan for laying the foundation of a proposed Ram temple very close to the then existing mosque.

"It gives us a lot of satisfaction that this old litigation has finally come to a conclusion. We have a very strong case and I am very hopeful that our claim over the disputed land would be upheld," Jilani told IANS late Monday.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • shahnawaz kukkikatte, dubai/udupi

    Tue, Jul 27 2010

    Dear Brother Keshav, Solmelu

    In order for me to agree with you, could please be kind enough to give me the copy of the ASI report and its source or a link so that I read it and then counter comment. I look forward to your reply.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Keshava, Puttur

    Tue, Jul 27 2010

    Mr Kukkikatte, if you remember the report from ASI (Archeological Survey of India) it is clearly mentioned that the foundation of the so called Babri masjid was that of Ram temple. Nobody can deny that. Only you should give certificate that Babar never destroyed the temple.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • shahnawaz kukkikatte, dubai/udupi

    Tue, Jul 27 2010

    Keshav,

    Babar never destroyed the temple and built a mosque in its place. This is ill founded thesis of RSS and other fundamental outifits.

    All citizens must welcome and respect the court ruling without any reservations. It may go against the wishes of muslims or hindus, but for harmonious co existance and peace, even the verdict goes against any community, everyone must welcome and there should not be any appeal and people should co operate with each other in implementing court decission. Long live India and all Indians are brothers and sisters.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Keshava, Puttur

    Mon, Jul 26 2010

    It is well known fact that Babar an outsider entered India and demolished the temple and built mosque over the foundation of the temple. The h'able court must order to rebuild the temple at the site and build a mosque at a different place. This can solve the issue in a balancing way.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Court Decision on Disputed Ayodhya Land in September



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.