Latest


Millions Strike Work against Privatisation, Rising Prices

  •   Tue, Sep 07 2010 11:12:09 PM

New Delhi/Kolkata/Mumbai, Sep 7 (IANS): India's economy suffered losses worth thousands of crores Tuesday as a 24-hour strike called by eight trade unions against rising prices and privatisation hit life in parts of the country, particularly Left-ruled states including West Bengal where one person was killed. One of the trade unions warned of more such strikes.  
 
Millions stayed away from work and many flights were cancelled in the protest against the economic policies of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government. Among the strike-backers was the Congress-affiliated Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC).

The strike was virtually complete in the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) ruled states of West Bengal, Tripura and Kerala, while it evoked a mixed response in states like Tamil Nadu and Assam, and a tepid reaction in Karnataka.

The financial capital Mumbai and the national capital New Delhi were relatively unaffected except for commuters who were hit with autorickshaws joining the protest.

According to INTUC president G. Sanjeeva Reddy, around 100 million (10 crore) workers from sectors including banks, insurance, power, telecom, coal, defence, port and dock, road transport and petroleum and unorganised sectors such as construction took part in the showdown.

The Rajya Sabha MP and convener of the Coordination Committee of the Central Trade Unions, which called the strike, told IANS from Hyderabad that the strike was "99 percent" successful.

The strike, he said, was held to "reassert" the bargaining power of the trade unions.
According to him, government leaders, including Manmohan Singh, wanted to discuss the workers' demands.

The unions that called the strike were, besides INTUC, the All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC), Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), All India United Trade Union Centre (AIUTUC), Trade Union Coordination Centre (TUCC), All India Central Council of Trade Unions (AICCTU), United Trade Union Congress (UTUC) and Hind Mazdoor Sabha (HMS).

The workers want a check on price rise of essential commodities, pro-active measures to protect employment in recession-hit sectors, strict enforcement of all basic labour laws, Rs.50,000 crore for an unorganised workers' social security fund, and a halt to privatization of central public sector enterprises.

While the demands found resonance in places like West Bengal, where an activist of the opposition Trinamool Congress was killed, it was viewed differently by India Inc.

"Today's strike by the major trade unions is totally unjustified. Such strikes do not serve any purpose, only affect productivity and adversely hit social and economic development, apart from the interests of average people," said Assocham president Swati Piramal.

The chamber also reacted to the opposition of trade unions to foreign investment into India as also the divestment of shares in state-run firms.

"Foreign capital is required in India for economic activities such as manufacturing, which will create jobs and ensure social and economic uplift of India and opposing it will only push India's growing economy into isolation," Piramal said.

While the industrialists weighed the economic costs, in West Bengal, for instance, it was also a battle of political supremacy. Life ground to a halt in most parts of the state, crippling commercial activities and road traffic. Private airlines cancelled 129 flights.

A Trinamool activist was shot dead and five people were seriously injured in bombings allegedly carried out by the ruling CPI-M in Birbhum district. There were clashes in other parts of the state too.

Life in Tripura was crippled as well with most markets, shops and business establishments, government and semi-government offices, educational institutions, banks and financial institutions shut. Roads were deserted and rail services between Tripura and the rest of the country affected.

In Assam, life was impacted in many places though tea and oil production were not hit.

Elsewhere in India, there was a mixed response.

In Mumbai, barring the financial services sector, including public sector banks, insurance companies and some private banks, autorickshaws and some taxi drivers joining the labour strike, it was business as usual. Pune and Nagpur, in fact, buzzed with activity as Congress MP Rahul Gandhi visited schools in the two cities.

According to Vishwas Utagi, secretary of the All India Bank Employees Association, around one million bank employees protested against a host of issues including foreign direct investments in public sector banks and entry of foreign banks.

In Punjab and Haryana, public bus services were badly hit. And in Chhattisgarh, nearly 250,000 government employees joined the strike and around 550 of them were arrested in capital Raipur.

Congratulating the masses for making the strike a "success", the CITU warned of more such strikes if the government did not bow to their demands.

"If the government doesn't concede to the demands, we will intensify our struggle and we are thinking of marching to parliament with a few lakh of people during its coming winter session," CITU all India secretary Kali Ghosh said in Kolkata. 
  

Top Stories

Mangaluru: First Neuro Hospital gets global recognition from WSO

  •   7 hours ago    3

Comment on this article

  • Theo D'Silva, Kadri/Toronto

    Tue, Sep 07 2010

    Dear freinds,
    Trade Unions are good to certain extent, to fight the rights of middle class and the poor. This is Justified as a socialistic. But we do need the capitalist to invest and provide jobs to all. And we also need democracy. But brothern, the defination of wealth in economics is theft. Illegal wealth should be taken over by the state. We need a clean society of Capitalistic, Socialistic and a Democratic country to live in by providing poor and middle class people with wellfare and unemployment benefits. So, nobody starves in this rich country. After all wealth(money) is peoples creation whereas, we are God's creation. thanks, theo

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • A.S.Mathew, U.S.A.

    Tue, Sep 07 2010

    India must be called the "strike capital of the world". No other country has this problem of such maganitude. In the U.S., strikes are common, but the strikers will never interfere with the public life. Is there any history in Russia and China where the working class set out to the street to strike?

    The State owned enterprises like Air India is a classical example of the failed state-owned system.
    Those enterprises were simply  like an open ground for creating jobs, thus creating a set of
    oversized and less productive working class.

    India has to release all the business to private sector, other than national defence and such other
    strategically sensitive branches of the government. On the other hand, if the government permit a
    free hand to exercise their freedom to exploit the working class must be checked through strict laws.
    Capitalism without checks and balance can create some unhealthy consequence to the working class.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Antony Crasta, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 07 2010

    Government would do well to tread carefully when allowing privatisation of the Public Sector Enterprises and utilities, and it should be a balancing act, as AD Shenoy also said. While privatisation would have served well in the Western countries, India has a long history and practise of running Government and Public Sector enterprises, whose main purpose and objective is to serve it`s common people, massive in number, and looking after their well being, and it should continue to do so. Sadly, when privatisation takes place, the main motive changes to profit making and looking after the interest of the capitalists and shareholders, and in the process, prices of commodities and goods rise, as they are no longer controlled by the Government, and also there will always be cut or reduction in the services, thus affecting the ordinary people. Moreover, in the privatisation process, re-organisation, downsizing and cost reduction take place, often resulting in mass redunancies and uncertainty of jobs. Resorting to work stoppages, strikes and bundhs etc are some of the ways the Trade Unions and allied organisations express their resentment, opposition and unhappiness, and in the process, sadly, the public has to face a lot of inconvenience and hardship. But this action, unpleasant one though, sometimes becomes necessary, as this is the ultimate way the message can be conveyed strongly.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • adshenoy, mangloor

    Tue, Sep 07 2010

    Does this only happens in India? Perhaps on a granduer scale. The Bundhs. The rising prices, inflation and privatisation is worry of massive capitalisation of Indian economy. Some might argue this capitalisation of Indian economy is good for the country. Others argue that this is bad for the country where 80% Indian population is agriculural and self sustaining. I am one of those who oppose massive capitalist econmy- a debt based economy.
    India needs a balance in the short and long run.

    Look at the economies of so called capitalist industrial economies of the west and some in the east. They are virtually bankrupt and looking for way out of it but its too late. The existence was based on massive borrowing in living and this is the negetive side of capitalism.
    Prime Minister must pay attetinn to local reality and not embrace oxford and harward theories of economics.
    THe prime minister must allow massive scale FDI because this will just rob the country while giving temporary wealth which cannot be sustainable in the long run.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Millions Strike Work against Privatisation, Rising Prices



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.

You might also like