Let's wait for WHO on Covaxin, SC on plea for re-vaccination by Covishield


New Delhi, Oct 29 (IANS): The Supreme Court on Friday said it will wait for the WHO's decision on indigenous vaccine Covaxin's recognition, before taking up a plea seeking permission for voluntary re-vaccination with Covishield, for those fully vaccinated with Covaxin, so as to enable them to travel abroad.

A bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud observed that it has been reported that Bharat Biotech, manufacturer of Covaxin, has submitted the latest data to the WHO. The bench added that the decision is expected to come and told the petitioner's counsel to wait for some time, as there will not be any difficulty when the WHO recognises Covaxin.

The petition filed by Kartik Seth urged the top court to issue direction to the Centre, Bharat Biotech, the Indian Council of Medical Research, and the Directorate General of Health Services, to not restrain those who voluntarily, at their own risk, want to get vaccinated by Covishield, after taking two shots of Covaxin.

The petitioners' counsel argued that students, who were willing to study abroad, were facing difficulties in the absence of Covaxin's recognition by the WHO.

To this, the bench said how could it say that people who have been administered by one vaccine, should be permitted to have another one. "We don't know what the complications will be. We can't play with people's lives," it said, insisting that the petitioner should wait, noting that it does not know what repercussions will originate from re-vaccination with a different vaccine.

After arguments, the top court scheduled the matter for further hearing post Diwali vacation.

The petitioner's counsel pointed out that data in connection with Covishield was submitted to the WHO in December last year, after which it was recognised.

The plea also sought directions for the Centre to issue SOPs and guidelines, which would allow re-vaccination of fully vaccinated persons with another vaccine.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Neptune, Mangalore

    Sat, Oct 30 2021

    Vaccine racism exists. It is real. You know if you travel abroad.. but no need to damage the image of a pretty old Indian vaccine manufacturer, which has been making vaccines and antivenom for decades. And no need to tarnish ICMR which is few of the good organisations for medical research in India. I dont like politicians including PM. But I have taken Covaxin. It may not have high efficacy but its surely better than the Chinese stuff. WHO is a communist puppet and it credibility is slipping. Among all the vaccine technologies that exist, i trust the good old inactivated-virus vaccine made by India. Its tried and tested method for centuries. And it works. The new stuff, you dont even know wht are the long term side effects. Yet they say benefits outweigh risks, covaxin doesnt have those deadly side effects. It just might be a true vaccine! And the others.... who knows still what will happen?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • k b r, Mangala Uru

    Sat, Oct 30 2021

    bhaktha gulaamas who trusted fake stories about aatmanirbhar are in trouble now...

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Let's wait for WHO on Covaxin, SC on plea for re-vaccination by Covishield



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.