Watching child porn a crime under POCSO Act or not? SC to decide on Sep 23


New Delhi, Sep 23 (IANS): The Supreme Court will pronounce on Monday its verdict on a plea challenging a Madras High Court ruling that watching child pornography in private would not fall within the scope of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

As per the causelist published on the website of the apex court, the judgment, authored by Justice J.B. Pardiwala, will be pronounced on September 23.

In March this year, CJI D.Y. Chandrachud-led Bench issued a notice on the plea challenging the Madras High Court order which had held that downloading and possessing child pornography does not amount to any offence.

The Madras High Court in its impugned judgment had quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against a 28-year-old Chennai man, holding that watching child pornography in private would not fall within the scope of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

A bench of Justice N. Anand Venkatesh reasoned that the accused had merely downloaded the material and watched the pornography in privacy and it was neither published nor transmitted to others. "Since he has not used a child or children for pornographic purposes, at best, it can only be construed as a moral decay on the part of the accused person."

The Chennai police registered an FIR under Sections 67 B of the Information Technology Act and Section 14(1) of the POCSO Act after it seized the phone of the accused and discovered that he had downloaded and possessed child pornography.

In India, both the POCSO Act 2012 and the IT Act 2000, along with other laws, criminalise the creation, distribution, and possession of child pornography.

 

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: Watching child porn a crime under POCSO Act or not? SC to decide on Sep 23



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.