Bangalore: Court Upholds Women’s Right to Property Share


The Hindu

Bangalore, Jul 9: In a landmark judgement, the Karnataka High Court on Wednesday struck down a Central amendment to the Hindu Succession Act limiting the right of women to a share of parental property, before December 20, 2004.

The Centre had carried out several amendments to the Hindu Succession Act. While the amendment gave equal right to daughters in the share of parental property and treated them on a par with their brothers, it was made applicable only after December 20, 2004. Thus, women had no right to a share of any property sold before that date. Other amendments to the Act were in respect of a will or testament and partition of property. The amendment had not recognised oral partition. The amendment to the Act had come into force from September 9, 2005.

A resident of Bangalore, Shanta, had challenged the limitation relating to sale of property before December 20, 2004. She had questioned the legality of the action of her father and her brothers in selling property and not giving her a share. She termed as illegal and ultra vires the amendment, saying that it ran against the spirit of equality. She also challenged the constitutional validity of proviso 39 to Section 6 (1) C of Hindu Succession Act (Amendment) 2005.

Justice Ananda Byrareddy upheld her contentions and struck down the proviso limiting the right of women to inherit a share of parental property.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • siddeswara, andhra pradesh

    Mon, Oct 19 2015

    Hindu sucession 1956,1985 law was not opposed by peoples.where hindu sucession amendment act 2005 is completely opposed by peoples in india.till now in villages they have not done partation deed through registration because there are illeturaes and they are not in a postion to pay registration fees.oral partation and family settlement is common in hindus family,even mutuation transfer is also not accepting the 2005 law.debit is not accepted by married womens as law clearely says.then the debits of fathers and grandfathers who has to pay only males ? is it correct if the daughters have equal share then debits also to be shared equally.one thing i can say only because of 2005 amendment act all peoles are around the courts and lawyers getting good benefit.2005 law was made with out anyknowledge and also it is completely opposed by peoples including womens.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • sree, bangalore

    Fri, Oct 26 2012

    while selling property deduct the ammount spended for theirs expenditures and same visaversa if any extra are additional expenditure for you aswell simple

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • shahnawaz kukkikatte, dubai/udupi

    Thu, Jul 09 2009

    All of you have commented according to your understanding and in your perspective without having much knowledge of Islamic sharia law. so I have no ill feeling about it. If you really want to have a better understanding of islamic law and inheritance rights of a woman, I advise you to read Chapter A''Nissaa (The women). Its translation is available in English so that you shall have a better glimpse of it. Just for arguments sake please dont comment. Uniform civil code cant be accepted by those who have faith in Quran and the day of Judgement. I am the one of those who oppose and stand against the implementation.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abraham Coutinho, Mundkur/Bombay

    Thu, Jul 09 2009

    What one is expected is to follow is the "Law of the Land". So all Muslims in Saudi must and should follow Sharia Law. However, in India, Muslims are allowed to follow Mohmmadian Law. They are given right to follow their Civil - Divine Law from the Aasmani Qitab - the Holy Quran. Uniform civil code is not applied. Hindu Law is different. The girl is given her share of property as dowry in Marriage. It is called "Sthree Dhan" in Samskrit.

     It is in the form of cash and gold. Plus all marriage expenses and taking care of first delivery also. It is given by the Father, if he has not got, by brother/s. There ends her right. It is being followed from time immemorial in Hinduism which is at least 5,000 years old. After the anti-dowry law came, girls property share (even after marriage) effective from 2004 came into being.In Hinduism the Dowry is given by the Bride while in Islam it is taken by the Bride.

    In Hinduism the Marriage is a Sacrament - "Samskara", not a " Nikha" - Contract. In Saudi where the Muslim Civil Law was generated, the people were living by the Oasis (water sources) in the desert and if the wife is divorced by the husband she had to come back to another Oasis where her father is living and she becomes his burden. So is the riverse dowry case. India and Saudi are two different geographical locations and faiths and so are different suitable laws. Should not be compared or feel grand about it.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • VINOD, Dubai

    Thu, Jul 09 2009

    This is India, & not muslim country, where shaira law is applicable, This law will benefit many women, what about the brothers who spend their earnings to get their sister getting married & giving dowry, when they get settled & come back again asking for more share

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • shahnawaz kukkikatte, dubai/udupi

    Wed, Jul 08 2009

    India gave women their share in the parental property only in the year 2004 and but being a muslim I have to advise you all that in Islam women has the right to her ancestral property with certain provisions and sharia laws clearly upholds her right as 2:1 i.e women get half of the share of her male counterpart. If we apply uniform civil code then provisions of islamic shariah law shall not be applied and sharia law is devine law and tenets of it is derived from Holy Quran and man made laws are full of lapses and cannot be accepted by the muslims.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bangalore: Court Upholds Women’s Right to Property Share



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.