In lockdown, Yogi govt serves notice on 'Wire' editor


Lucknow, Apr 12 (IANS): In the midst of the national lockdown, the Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh has served a notice on Siddharth Varadarajan, founding editor of 'The Wire' for allegedly making "objectionable comment" about the Chief Minister.

The matter pertains to an article published in The Wire on March 31 against the backdrop of the controversy over the Tablighi Jamaat event in Delhi's Nizamuddin area that left many participants infected with the coronavirus.

In a tweet, Varadarajan had mistakenly claimed that Adityanath had said, "Lord Ram would protect devotees from the coronavirus."

The following day, he posted a clarification that the statement had been made by Acharya Paramhans, the head of the Ayodhya temple trust, not by Yogi Adityanath. A correction was also made to The Wire's article.

In a series of tweets, sociologist and Varadarajan's wife Nandini Sundar said seven or eight policemen had come to their home in Delhi on Friday, claiming that they had driven from Ayodhya for the "essential service" to deliver the notice.

"When it comes to the gross abuse of police power by the Adityanath administration in UP and its intolerance of press freedom, it is clear that Covid-19, the lockdown and social distancing make no difference whatsoever," Sundar said.

"Today, April 10, at 2 p.m. a plainclothes man came to our home and said he had come from the Ayodhya 'prashasan' (administration) to serve notice on Varadarajan. He would not give his name. I told him to leave it in the mailbox. He refused."

Sundar claimed that the two men in uniform also did not have any masks and among them only two identified themselves. "On insisting, they gave plainclothes man's name as Chanderbhan Yadav, not designation," she tweeted. "Cops said they'd driven from Ayodhya for this essential service!"

"They wouldn't let me sign the notice -- 'Our rule is not to give it to women and minors,'" Sundar added.

"When asked to be shown the rule, they sought instructions on phone and let me sign. Then, they phoned their boss to say notice has been received," she said.

Mritunjay Kumar, the media advisor to Adityanath, had said on April 1 that action had been taken against Varadarajan since he had neither deleted the tweet nor apologized.

The FIR was filed based on the complaint of Nitish Kumar Srivastav, a resident of Faizabad in Uttar Pradesh.

In his complaint, Srivastav said: "The Wire editor on his blog, with the aim to spread rumors and hostility among the public, publicized the following message: 'On the day the Tablighi Jamaat event was held, Yogi Adityanath insisted that a large fair planned for Ayodhya on the occasion of Ram Navami from March 25 to April 2 would proceed as usual while Acharya Paramhans said that Lord Ram would protect devotees from the coronavirus."

The complainant said this amounted to "an objectionable comment" against Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Adityanath, "which has caused anger among people".

However, the FIR did not name the editor.

The Editors Guild of India said the first information report against the editor was "an overreaction and an act of intimidation".

Congress leader P Chidambaram had on April 2 attacked the Uttar Pradesh government and called the FIR a "deplorable act", intended to suppress media freedom.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Ramesh Babu, Mangalore

    Mon, Apr 13 2020

    Is it ok for to talk all rubbish about Shahrukh?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • francis, Mangalore

    Mon, Apr 13 2020

    the wire was given several chances to correct thier statement.
    He refused to.

    Now FIR has been framed.
    These Fake story guys should be put behind bars.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • smr, Karkala

    Sun, Apr 12 2020

    The manner in which the U.P government and its police have been pursuing this with a single-minded agenda smacks of vindictiveness.

    A story in The Wire on March 31 about the sealing of the Tablighi Jamaat premises in Delhi. The story mentioned, by way of background, the Adityanath government’s stand on gatherings in Ayodhya at the time the Tablighi event was supposedly underway (i.e. March 15-18) and Adityanath’s presence with other people at a religious event in Ayodhya one day after Prime Minister Modi had declared a national lockdown and a ban on all such gatherings.

    When it comes to the gross abuse of police power by the Adityanath administration in UP and its intolerance of press freedom, it is clear that COVID-19, the lockdown and social distancing make no difference whatsoever.
    If lock down is applicable to Tablig Jamat then it should also applicable to CM Yogi for doing any public religious as well. If there is 'Lakshman Rekha' set by the Prime Minister it should be the duty of BJP ruled CM to abide by the law.

    This is nothing but an clean attempts to Muzzle the Media which publish the truth.

    Jai Hind

    DisAgree [1] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh, Udupi

    Sun, Apr 12 2020

    We need media like wire, scroll.in and quint to stop the fake news on social media.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • moshu, mangaluru

    Sun, Apr 12 2020

    Tum kare toh raasleela aur hum kare toh character dheela!!! Wah Yogiji wah...!!!

    DisAgree [21] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Mangalore

    Sun, Apr 12 2020

    The wire, Scroll and Quint post one sided stories. Those who oppose post card should also oppose these online motivated spin doctors.

    DisAgree [25] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shamsuddin, Dubai

    Sun, Apr 12 2020

    Lol. They are more balanced than one-sided Post card.
    Post card needs to rename as puskat

    DisAgree [17] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: In lockdown, Yogi govt serves notice on 'Wire' editor



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.