Yadav Chieftains Stifle Women's Aspirations


New Delhi, March 8 (IANS) Two Yadav chieftains, with a combined strength of 15 in the Rajya Sabha, succeeded Monday to prevent voting on a historic legislation that seeks to reserve one-third seats in parliament and state assemblies for women.

Samajwadi Party leader (SP) Mulayam Singh Yadav and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Lalu Prasad, both backward caste leaders, raised much noise both inside and outside parliament against the women's reservation bill and forced a rethink in the Congress-led government in going ahead with voting on the legislation that has been in the works for the past 13 years.

The voting was scheduled Monday in Rajya Sabha which has an effective strength of 233 members. It is now expected Tuesday.

The two Yadavs, who also had backing of a section of Janata Dal (United) led by Sharad Yadav in the Lok Sabha, the lower house, made it clear that they were willing to be thrown out of the house in their protest against the bill.

"We will use our democratic rights fully whatever the consequences. They (the government) can get us thrown out," Lalu Prasad said here.

His party and SP forced several adjournment of the two houses of parliament on the issue. The RJD leader said the bill was a "political dacoity" and "won't be tolerated."

Mulayam Singh Yadav said he was not afraid of losing his membership in the "fight for social justice."

Both the Yadavs have demanded reservation for women belonging to minorities, backward classes and Dalits within the 33 per cent reservation provided in the bill.

The two leaders said they were not against reservation for women but wanted its benefits should go to the poor women who work in the fields. They also challenged the Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party to get the bill passed without issuing whips.

With a predominantly rural base and only a symbolic presence of women in their parties in the higher echelons, the SP and RJD have been in the vanguard of protest over the proposal for reservation for women since it was first brought to the Parliament in 1996.

The Yadav leaders said the bill was a "conspiracy" to remove established political leadership of their parties.

SP and RJD support the Congress-led government from outside and the two leaders made it clear that they will withdraw their support if the government pushed through the bill.

For the Congress that had made a build up for the passage of bill on the centenary of International Women's Day, it was a sort of climbdown.

"The bill will be definitely be passed. The dream (of women reservation) will become a reality," Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi said.

Congress sources said the party was also evidently concerned about ruffling feathers of SP and RJD too hard. They said with Bahujan Samaj Party also conveying its opposition to the bill, the government was keen not to burn its bridges with parties that have in the past helped it cope it with crisis.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • jacintha, mangalore

    Tue, Mar 09 2010

    These men, and their likes were fed well by the women in the house, and they have prosperous tummies.

    Now time to step into the same kitchen and reduce the size. Shameless men these leaders are.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • R Mallar, Kasragod/ Dubai

    Tue, Mar 09 2010

    At Panchayat level where women have reservations, one can actually see a better adminstartion! So it is fair enough. However, if a parliamentary seat where the present male MP is doing exceedingly well is reserved for women, then is it justified?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur,Puttur/Mangalore

    Tue, Mar 09 2010

    Mr. Nagesh Nayak,, Bangalore, You are the one among the fundamentals who spews venom against other communities moving with leaf lets to every door steps. Why do you beg always perhaps God might have given you good physique? AAGE JAAVO CHUTTA NAHIN (Move front no changes) NOW ONE MORE TIME A POISONOUS SNAKE NAAG WILL APPEAR.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Lydia Lobo, Kadri

    Mon, Mar 08 2010

    Hats off to Vera. You have put it in a best way.

    Bill or no bill... women will come up in life very soon. No more pleading against dowry deaths, female infanticide, human trafficking ! Male domination will be a thing of the past.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • JOY CASTELINO, MOODUBELLE/DUBAI

    Mon, Mar 08 2010

    Nagesh nayaK, for your kind information SHRI.RAM VILAS PASWAN was also the part of NDA government. After listening to him some years Vajpayee treat him like Tissue Paper & Threw.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Vera Alvares, Mumbai

    Mon, Mar 08 2010

    Welcome to the real India or Bharat- the unjust patriarchy where women form the work force and men lord over them reclining in their 'charpai' thrones! Meet the 'backword' leaders who want to remain backward so that they can grow rich and powerful by keeping 50% of their clan members( women) illiterate, exploited and supressed. So that they can make decisions for them, vote in their place, turn them into beasts of burden or marry them off as kids to old widowers......Manmohan & co cannot kill what the system nourishes, they cannot liberate the chunk of society supressed brutally and forcefully into being subservient to the lords and masters.


    There are no riddles here- Why did Lalu make his daughter a doctor? Why is the smooth, slimy Yadav pushing his son into the limelight? Why has Paswan paid Crores to Kangna to act opposite his son in a forth-coming movie? The aswer is simple- Riches and power!

    As an after thought let me add that if women have made any progress in life it is not because some of their sisters are in high positions in the corridors of power....it is because the girls themselves have faught to rise to the top by breaking the shackles that bind them.....So why are we crying over a few seats in the parliamnet or Legislature lost to women as long as the 'Yadav' clan is fighting fit? Forget it.....Women will fight their way to the top.......Happy Women's Day!

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdul Rahman, Dubai

    Mon, Mar 08 2010

    No doubt these Yadav's have political agenda behind rejecting the Women's Bill but I oppose this Bill for a different reason. Women empowering is required but not at the cost of the nation. Reservations in the Parliament and assemblies whether it is for women or dalits or SC/ST should altogether be abolished, only the able and honest people should get elected to rule this country.In the name of reservation we are trying to turn the wheel of progress backwards.What we require today to lead our country is able and sincere leaders whether it is women, minority, majority whatever.We should not get carried away by hollow canvassing by woman protagonists.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • nagesh nayaK, bangalore

    Mon, Mar 08 2010

    SHRI. LALU YADAV,SHRI.MULAYAM YADAV & SHRI.RAM VILAS PASWAN WERE THE PART OF THE UPA DURING 2004-2009. THEN CONGRESS WAS LISTENING TO THESE TRIO WHATEVER THEY SAY. NOW CONGRESS IS TREATING THEM LIKE A TISSUE PAPER. USE & THROW. MATALABI CONGRESS. EXPECTING ONE MORE COMMENT ABOUT COFFINN .JAI HO.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Yadav Chieftains Stifle Women's Aspirations



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.