Sacrosanct duty of husband to maintain wife, children even by physical labour: SC

New Delhi, Sep 28 (IANS): The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it is the sacrosanct duty of the husband to provide financial support to the wife and minor children, even by physical labour, if he is able-bodied.

A bench of Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Bela M. Trivedi said: "It is the sacrosanct duty of the husband to provide financial support to the wife and to the minor children. The husband is required to earn money even by physical labour, if he is an able-bodied, and could not avoid his obligation, except on the legally permissible grounds mentioned in the statute."

"At the outset, it may be noted that Section 125 of the CrPC was conceived to ameliorate the agony, anguish, and financial suffering of a woman who is required to leave the matrimonial home, so that some suitable arrangements could be made to enable her to sustain herself and the child," it said.

Citing an apex court judgment, the bench said it has been held that the object of maintenance proceedings is not to punish a person for his past neglect, but to prevent vagrancy and destitution of a deserted wife, by providing her food, clothing, and shelter by a speedy remedy.

"As settled by this court, Section 125 CrPC is a measure of social justice and is specially enacted to protect women and children. It also falls within the constitutional sweep of Article 15(3), reinforced by Article 39 of the Constitution," it said.

Allowing the plea by a woman against a Faridabad family court order, which was upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the top court said the family court, in the instant case, had not only overlooked and disregarded the aforesaid settled legal position, but had proceeded with the proceedings in an absolutely perverted manner.

"Such an erroneous and perverse order of Family Court was unfortunately confirmed by the High Court by passing a very perfunctory impugned order," it added.

It declined to entertain the husband's contention that he had a small business, which was closed, therefore he had no source of income. "The respondent being able-bodied, he is obliged to earn by legitimate means and maintain his wife and the minor child," said the bench. It also directed the man to pay Rs 10,000 to the wife over and above Rs 6,000 to the son.

The husband had also questioned the chastity of his wife and alleged that the boy was not his biological son. However, his application for a DNA test was rejected by the family court. The family court also disallowed the woman's plea for maintenance and the daughter, but directed the man to pay Rs 6,000 monthly to the son.



Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • mohan prabhu, mangalore/canada

    Wed, Sep 28 2022

    Lifelong noose around the husband.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed, Bangalore

    Thu, Sep 29 2022

    Can understand if married then it's a husband duty to look after the wife and kids even by hard labour. But after divorce the concept of paying lifelong to wife looks totally absurd. Yes for kids if sons then util they grow up and become graduate and therr after it depends on father and sons relation, if its daughter upto her marriage. But for wife, what if the divorce taken coz of cruelty or bad things of wife? Why should one pay for such women? What if the divorced wife get married to other person and enjoying her new life? In such should the husband continue to pay? None is coming clear on such issues. All twisting and changing rules as per their personal thinking and mindset. If you make laws such stringent on men, then may be in future men may not like to marry but may carry illegal relationship or in today's term live in. God fearing men may mostly avoid getting married as they dislike illegal relationship.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

Leave a Comment

Title: Sacrosanct duty of husband to maintain wife, children even by physical labour: SC

You have 2000 characters left.


Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will be held responsible.