If Muslims opposed, no Hindu would have been left in India during Mughal rule: Former HC judge


Vijayapura, Dec 2 (IANS): A retired district judge, Vasantha Mulasavalagi has created controversy in the state after he said that Hindus survived in India because the Muslims rulers let them be.

"If Muslims had opposed Hindus during the Mughal rule not a single Hindu would have been left in India...They could have killed all Hindus. Though they ruled over for hundreds of years, why Muslims remain a minority?" said Mulasavalagi.

The retired judge made the controversial statements in a seminar titled 'Has objectives of the Constitution been fulfilled?' at Vijayapura city in the state. The statement went viral on social media. The seminar organised by Raastreeya Souharda Vedike and other organisations was held on Thursday.

"Those who claim that Muslims have done this and that, must know what 700 years of history of Muslim rule in India tells," he said. "Mughul king Akbar's wife remained a Hindu and she did not get converted to Islam. Akbar had built a Krishna temple in his courtyard. People can see this now also," he said.

He further said, "Hindu Gods, Lord Ram and Lord Krishna, are just characters in a novel. They are not historical personalities." The retired judge further said that emperor Ashoka was the real historical figure.

"In Uttarakhand, the images of Buddha were depicted on Shivling. The Buddhist followers had filed a petition in this regard. It is maintained that temples have been converted into mosques. Before temples were built, emperor Ashoka had built 84,000 Buddha viharas. Where did they go? It had happened during the course of time. Can it be made a big issue?" Vasantha Mulasavalagi asked.

"The objectives of the constitution are clear and accurate. The suspicions are created as the system is failing to fulfil the objectives of the constitution. The young generation must turn vigilant and active in this direction to end this," he maintained.

"There was a law in 1999 to maintain the status quo and to keep the temples, churches and mosques as they are. Despite this, the district court has given contradicting verdict in this regard," he said.

"We have to think about the contemporary scenario. We should not go back. We have to raise our voice rightfully," he maintained.

Arali Nagaraj, another retired judge opined that there should be an affidavit by all the candidates that after winning elections they won't change the party. "There is a need for the formation of such a law. Before Independence, patriotism was at greater levels in the country. Presently selfishness has taken over," he added.

 

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • ca girishkk, valencia/m'lore

    Sat, Dec 03 2022

    Wrongs of history can't be corrected by making one more wrong.., people are educated & aware of their rights... every country is ruled & governed by their respective constitution & laws of the land.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed, RUH

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Absolutely correct. There is no controversy here and what he said is the absolute truth. People like it or not, this is the truth. Andh Bhakth or sangee mindset will never digest this bitter truth.

    DisAgree [18] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Don, Mangalore

    Sat, Dec 03 2022

    Non Muslims survived in lands ruled by Muslims, ONLY because of one reason we paid a hefty tax called "JAZIYA", it was not because of their generosity. We paid with our blood, with our sweat and with our tears in hard cold cash or in kind. They just came and demanded half of our produce for FREE. I have a question for Muslims, What would happen if someone could not, or did not pay Jaziya? The answer is, in lieu of Jaziya payments they took your son, daughter, wife or anything they wished including your life, when you didn't pay them for any reason.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • sunil, mangalore

    Sat, Dec 03 2022

    What rubbish - 80 % majority muslims went to PAKISTAN and BANGLADESH in 1947. Where are the 20% hindus of 1947 in Bangladesh and Pakistan is the proof that no hindu can survive in muslim majority country . Thats why majority Hindu came back to hindu land India in 1947.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed, RUH

    Sun, Dec 04 2022

    Another Andh Bhakth. Get your facts right. Without any solid facts all u have left is rotor mouth and Bullshit. What Baba Saheb Ambedkar had recognized and drafted the best constitution in the whole world knew that India needs good education. Its so sad that many educated have become blinded by Andh Bhakti and the fever of Hindutva has not yet come down. but the good news is the Hindutva fever is definitely slowing down faster than expected in recent times.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kumara, Bengaluru

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Another intellectual arises!!!

    DisAgree [3] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Manohar, Udupi

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Give thanks to British.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Alwin, Mangaluru

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Truth prevail

    DisAgree [7] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Namoona, Germany

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Yes sir. We buddhist minority will reclaim our viharas that have been usurped by Aryan invaders.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • RSRB, Al-Khor, Qatar

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Before Buddhist, was there no religion?

    DisAgree [2] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ahmed, Kudla

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Truth is always bitter my friend

    DisAgree [18] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse

  • Gibbs, Udupi/Bengaluru

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    FORMER HC JUDGE HAS EXPLAINED CLEARLY ABOUT THE HINDU MUSLIM CONTROVERSY. POLITICAL PARTIES HAS DIVERTED THE REAL ISSUE FOR POLITICAL GAINS AND CREATED HATRED AMONG OTHER COMMUNITIES. I SALUTE THE JUDGES.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [39] Reply Report Abuse

  • Pramod kumar, Manglore

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Trying hard for the congress rajyasabha seat may be?

    DisAgree [57] Agree [54] Reply Report Abuse

  • Prakash, Manipal

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    it is not a factual; statement... Hindus were majority then and are majority now... kings were not cunning politicians... it is not a joke to eliminate people like that even if anyone wanted... most soldiers in Mughal kingdoms were Hindus... this man is seeking attention... Sad gaya hai buddaa...

    DisAgree [24] Agree [61] Reply Report Abuse

  • chrisp, Managlore

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    yep, not retired, more like retarded judge.

    DisAgree [25] Agree [38] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev, Mangalore

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Aadha such! He is right and wrong at the same time. If all were converted then who is going to pay " jijiya" to sustain their expenses? This can be found during the time of prophet too. Nobody can rewrite the history now. An interesting fact - during the time of prophet there were jews, Christians, sabians, pagans were living in Arabia but what happened to them during or after him that not a single person was there but now migrants belonging to them are there?

    DisAgree [16] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • real kujuma, kodial

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    now abhinav bharath gang will be behind this man....he needs protection for sure..

    DisAgree [47] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • RK, Mangalore Surathkal

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Now some mulla of afgani might support him. He might want to stand for congo monkey party...

    DisAgree [42] Agree [57] Reply Report Abuse

  • RK, Mangalore Surathkal

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Kujuam.. people like you and althaf might lick his feet now 🤣🤣🤣

    DisAgree [31] Agree [45] Reply Report Abuse

  • real kujuma, kodial

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    licking and falling at feet is very much seen in maths and not in other religious places..

    DisAgree [43] Agree [48] Reply Report Abuse

  • rahul, kadri

    Fri, Dec 02 2022

    Cool down ..cool down...be calm...after covid..raising BP is risky

    DisAgree [12] Agree [13] Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: If Muslims opposed, no Hindu would have been left in India during Mughal rule: Former HC judge



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.