SC allows Jains to fast unto death, stays Rajasthan HC order


New Delhi, Aug 31 (HT): The Supreme Court on Monday stayed Rajasthan high court's order declaring Santhara, a Jain ritual of voluntary and systematic fasting to death, as a criminal offence and issued a notice to Centre and the Rajasthan government.

Earlier this month, the Rajasthan HC had banned Santhara making it punishable under section 306 (abetment of suicide) of the Indian Penal Code. The court, which had last reserved its judgment after the completion of arguments on April 23, declared that "Santhara is illegal in the eyes of law".

The ban on the Jain ritual came after a public interest litigation (PIL) was filed by human rights activist and advocate Nikhil Soni a decade ago. The activist claimed the ritual is a social evil and should be considered as suicide.

Thousands of Jains had held a 'silent march' to protest the Rajasthan high court judgement banning the religious ritual of fast unto death. Members of both Shwetambar and Digambar sects participated in marches which were held in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradhesh, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Assam and other states.

The ancient ritual, also called Sallekhana, consists of voluntary starvation to embrace death. The Swetambar (white sect) community, which practises the age-old ritual, considers it the ultimate way to attain moksha (release from the cycle of rebirth), when one believes that his life has served its purpose.

Practised mostly by elders nearing death or having no desire to live any more, this ritual demands the practitioner to even sacrifice drinking water and is not advisable for young adults or children.

The centuries-old practice of Santhara has been in the eye of a storm since 2006 when the case of 93-year-old Keila Devi Hirawat from Jaipur had international media debating whether there was any place for such a ritual in the modern world.

Later, Soni and his lawyer Madhav Mishra filed a PIL in the Rajasthan high court.

One of the concerns raised in the petition was that it is old people, who usually resort to Santhara, and allowing an elderly person to suffer without medical assistance, food and water is inhuman.

Jains, however, argue that it is a voluntary act of rational thinking and marks the beginning of a journey of understanding the inherently painful and flawed nature of earthly existence. For millions of Jains in India, the PIL was a direct violation of the Indian Constitution's guarantee of religious freedom.

While opponents of Santhara equate the practice with suicide and argue that it's a fundamental breach of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to life, supporters say that the right to life includes a corresponding right not to live.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, QC, mangalore/ottawa

    Mon, Aug 31 2015

    Mr Gonsalves is entitled to his religious beliefs which may not coincide with those of others of a different faith, or the same faith. Even predominantly Christian countries, like Canada do not consider suicide as murder, let alone abortion. and have legalized euthanasia. Canada's Supreme Court in its most recent judgment d that the Criminal Code provision making euthanasia a crime to be against the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Of course, the Roman Catholic faith doesn't accept that, but it is time it changes its attitude.

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur, Puttur / Mangalore

    Mon, Aug 31 2015

    There should have a natural death for a human.
    Otherwise it is considered as murder.
    By someone murders the other (Thou shall not kill).
    Or self murder.
    Or committing suicide. (self murder).

    DisAgree [2] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, mangalore/ottawa

    Mon, Aug 31 2015


    this is a sensible, totally legal judgment, as the moksha ritual is practiced by those who are very old and have no desire to be at the mercy of their loved ones or be a physical, emotional and financial burden on their family or even the State - the latter, especially if they are physically or mentally incapacitated. I support the constitutional argument that the right to live implies a right not to live.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • India First, India

    Mon, Aug 31 2015

    Some times SC & HC acts like husband & Wife. Most of the times they not agree with each others... :)

    DisAgree [1] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: SC allows Jains to fast unto death, stays Rajasthan HC order



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.