Yettinahole : Arguments at Green Tribunal conclude - wait begins for orders


Daijiworld Media Network- Beltangady (SP)

Beltangady, Mar 2: Arguments and hearing on three petitions opposing Yettinahole project filed with the Chennai bench of National Green Tribunal concluded on Tuesday March 1. With this, the wait for the verdict of the bench has begun. There were also arguments about the validity of applications and whether they have to be disallowed or admitted.

Karnataka advocate general, who appeared on behalf of Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd, argued that the applications were barred by limitation. He said that objections, if any, have to be filed within a specified period after notification about the implementation of project was issued. He expressed the opinion that the applications are fit to be rejected on this ground.

Advocates representing Yatiraju from Tumakuru, Purushotham Chitrapur from Mangaluru and K N Somashekhar from Bengaluru placed counter arguments against the above. Advocates, Prince Issac and A C Bhavya, sought to dismiss arguments placed by the advocate general as having no merit and baseless. They said that the complaint was filed in the court within the prescribed period.

The bench which heard the arguments posted the case for verdict. However, no specific date has been fixed for passing of orders. The tribunal now has to decide whether the applications have to be disallowed on the basis of having been barred by limitation. The activists are awaiting the orders with bated breath.

The activists had also filed objections in the past with the regional high powered committee of union ministry of environment and forests when it visited Yettinahole project area sometime back. The committee had opined that the project may be permitted as only 8.1 hectares of forest land would affected by it. The committee also had prescribed certain conditions to be fulfilled by Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd. The project envisages providing drinking water to 75.59 lac people from Kolar, Chikkaballapur, Bengaluru rural, Ramanagara, and parts of Tumakuru, Hassan, and Chikkamagaluru districts by the year 2023-24. But there is opposition even from people of Kolar to the project, as they feel that this project is not feasible because they feel that this project cannot generate so much drinking water.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Evans Christopher Sumitra, UDUPI/NEW YORK,USA.

    Thu, Mar 03 2016

    Just wait and watch for the outcome of this argument.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • FUTURE, Mangaluru

    Wed, Mar 02 2016

    We all from coastal areas are against Yettinahole project. Sometime we have to look within our own conscience/commitments whether we are saving/conserving water. Water shortage is everywhere, DK and Udupi are facing rain shortage due to which ponds,lakes, rivers are drying up.Why we are facing shortage of rain is it due MRPL or UPCL. Both companies are poisoning our atmosphere. The heat and gases that are left out is contributing to this.I live in outskirts of the city with Panchayat as local administrative body. Here the water supply is provided through bore well dug up in different areas and distributed accordingly.Due to lack of Rains but sufficient for rain water harvesting no action is taken for conserving WATER. The old bore wells have become defunct and are getting replaced in new areas that are having streams of water. Why is the panchayat not taking action by sourcing rain water back into the defunct bore wells by simple rain water harvesting. We the citizens of these areas have to see whether our elected leaders intentionally want to see their rise in income due to digging of bore wells but not doing water saving.Future we may not have any areas holding water underneath the earth.Plz any activists we need your help in saving OURSELF.

    DisAgree Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Mar 02 2016

    This time we are Genuinely praying for U-TURN ...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Yettinahole : Arguments at Green Tribunal conclude - wait begins for orders



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.