Banks should have acted earlier to stop Mallya: FM


New Delhi, Mar 10 (PTI): Finance Minister Arun Jaitley today said banks should have acted earlier to stop Vijay Mallya from going abroad, even as he warned of "appropriate action" against those responsible for any "inaction" in recovery of dues totalling over Rs 9,000 crore in the case.

Liquor baron Mallya, who is facing legal proceedings for alleged loan defaults by his group, left the country on March 2, even as banks have approached the courts to seek orders restraining him from going abroad. Opposition leaders have raised questions about how he was allowed to leave the country despite a 'lookout' notice by CBI.

"Let the bankers take all steps to recover their money. If somebody is responsible of inaction... or any other matter of this kind coming to our notice, we will certainly look into that and take appropriate action," Jaitley told reporters here.

He was responding to a query with regard to the Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi's charges that the government took no action to stop Mallya from moving out of the country.

Jaitley said, "There is a legal process to stop somebody (from going abroad). Either your passport is impounded or there is an order of a court. Otherwise, nobody can stop you. Banks went to court for seeking an order. In this anticipation, he (Mallya) left earlier." He further said: "It would have been better had banks started the process earlier."

"Rahulji must remember that there is a difference between Mallya going abroad and (Ottavio) Quattrocchi going abroad. I want to explain him that when Switzerland official informed that Quattrocchi is one of the beneficiaries of Bofors deal, at that time CBI investigation team head K Madhavan had written a letter for impounding his passport. But nobody stopped him. That was a criminal case," the finance minister said.

In the case of Mallya, Jaitley said that "when he left the country, the legal process was not started". He said total dues in Mallya cases including interest amount to Rs 9,091.40 crore as on November 30, 2015.

The loans to companies promoted by Mallya were sanctioned in 2004 to 2007 and those turned into bad loans in 2009. The NPAs were restructured in 2010.

Jaitley said, "There has to be a process. There is a law called the Passport Act under which an appropriate order has to be passed by the passport authority."

On cancelling of Mallya's Rajya Sabha membership, he said, "There is a process under the Constitution for cancelling the membership of the Rajya Sabha. It cannot be done through a press conference."

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • prr, sullia

    Fri, Mar 11 2016

    These NPA in public sector banks are the creation of Congress regime. Most of these loans originated in 2008-09. It was in NPA section of the banks back in 2013 itself. Modi govt is in a fire fight mode.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • MyrightIsaid, bengaluru

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Something tells me FM is happy Mallya got away in time.
    Was such great escape pre-planned with the blessing of Govt. and Banks? Timing so perfect...
    After all, Banks involved are all nationalised Banks!!!
    They so easily write off these loans as Very Bad deaths sorry debts.

    Now onwards "Catch me if you can" game will be played.
    Mallya and Modi sitting together with a drink called "Have a Good time" with complements from Indian Government.... cozy scene indeed.
    Both will get Humanitarian assistance from present Indian Government through its external affairs Ministry...whenever needed..

    DisAgree [1] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • devdas, mangalore

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    very funny. Are you recollecting a similar scenario that must have taken place when Quotrochi left India. But Modi was not here, nor jaitly. You seem to have a sarcastic mind , to deduce such theories without knowing the facts.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ben Mathias, Los Angeles, California

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Hope India is a country of law that includes Lending & Borrowing Law (Banking Law) As per Banking Law, "Banks have lend money to a registered Stock holding Company called King Fisher Airlines not to individual person called Honorable Vijay Mallya" Officer of the registered Stock holding Company has pledged Stocks and assets of the company as a security. Banks only can get pledged stocks and assets of the company has lien not the personal assets of the officer of the defaulting registered company called King Fisher Airline. Vijay Mally's all personal assets will be safe. Defaulting registered company called King Fisher Airline (not Honorable Vijay Mallya) has borrowed money from the lender legally. Only thing the courts can do foreclose King Fisher Airline Assets not personal assets of Honorable Vijay Mallya. Vijay Mallya is a Law abiding long time nonresident from India. He will be welcomed by any developed country with honor, respect and required travel document. Meanwhile Good luck to Indian lenders.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Do banking heads report to you or SMRITI ...

    DisAgree [1] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mark Dcruz, Mangalore

    Thu, Mar 10 2016

    Hahahahhahahah...

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Banks should have acted earlier to stop Mallya: FM



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.