We require more than 70,000 judges to clear pending cases: CJI


Cuttack, May 8 (PTI) : Continuing to express concern over low judge-population ratio in the country, Chief Justice of India T S Thakur today said access to justice was a fundamental right and governments cannot afford to deny it to the people.

After an emotional outburst over the issue in presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a conference in New Delhi recently, the CJI once again raised the matter while addressing a large gathering of legal luminaries here on the occasion of centennial celebrations of the circuit bench of the High Court.

"While we (judiciary) remain keen to ensure that judges' appointments are made quickly, the machinery involved with the appointment of judges continue to grind very slowly," Justice Thakur said, adding around 170 proposals for appointment of HC judges were now pending with the government.

Noting that the matter was brought to the notice of the Prime Minister recently with a plea to make the appointments quickly, he said people cannot be denied justice.

"Access to justice is a fundamental right and the government cannot afford to deny the people their fundamental right," he said.

Shortage of judges is one of the formidable challenges the judiciary is facing in the country now, the CJI said adding, out of some 900 sanctioned posts of judges in different High Courts of the country, there are over 450 vacancies which need to be filled up immediately.

Dwelling on the poor judge-population ratio, Justice Thakur said while the Law Commission of India in 1987 had suggested for having 44,000 judges to effectively tackle the then number of pending cases, the country today has only 18,000 judges.

"Thirty years down the line we continue to work with depleted strength. If you go by the number of people that have been added to the population, we may now require more than 70,000 judges to clear the pending cases," he said.

Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik, who was present as one of the guests of honour on the occasion, said his government was providing adequate financial support for improving the judicial infrastructure in the state.

"We are committed to the overall strengthening and development of justice delivery system in Odisha," Patnaik said.

Emphasising on "mutual respectability", the other guest of honour Justice Dipak Misra of the Supreme Court said the Orissa High Court has a glorious past and everybody must strive to live up to it.

At least ten judges of the Supreme Court and several judges of Calcutta, Patna and Jharkhand High Courts are participating in the centennial celebrations, which will continue for a week with seminars, conferences and cultural programmes lined up for the occasion.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • rahul, Mangalore

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Majority of Judges are required to clear scams of FIRST CORRUPT FAMILY.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • arm, ksa

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Na Sau Man Barega, Na Rada Nache Gi.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Pending/accumulated cases is due to slow judicial execution of deserving cases. Just take the rape and torture (murder) case of Nirbhaya. Pending since 2012 and how long it will continue.(in spite of fast track)? Money plays major role than actual execution. Session court, HC, SC, finally Presidents mercy appeal. That leads to increase in crime rate too.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Zeitgeist, Mangalore

    Mon, May 09 2016

    The shortages in judges is created to a situation where the people accused of crimes would spend most of the time out on bail.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • vivek, herebile / abudhabi

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Ok!!..Ok!!....Don't cry!...CJ..I, Shirman will do something....either he will get ex M.A students of Gujju University or...degree holders from Yale university....both Universities are like Backyard for B.J.P....

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sachidanand Shetty, Mundkur/Dubai

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Once they clear all the case files…..all those 70,000 Judges will be in trouble for jobless!!!! So, better be it in pending lists rather than creating another problem!!!! We know in India Justice is always delayed but most of the time Justice is not denied because India is a land of believers…..we believe the Indian Justice System till death and then we pass on the file to Almighty to give his final Judgement. Believe it or not till date it’s happening and working perfectly!!!!

    DisAgree [3] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Antonio DSilva, Kuwait

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Clear evidence that the word JUSTICE has become non-relevant in Indian judicial system.

    How can we have swift and clean justice when the catchword of the day is money and money and money.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • gm, mlur

    Mon, May 09 2016

    We have lot educated Lawyers, Advocates and Judges. If not we will get certificates in the Market.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Only in India murder accused spend 14 years in Jail without Trial ...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Frazer Town,B'lore

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Rationing the cases to the court by disposing other cases through other appointed authority may be the alternative remedy for this problem

    DisAgree [2] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Charles D'Mello, Pangala

    Sun, May 08 2016

    Instead of increasing the number of Judges.....kick out corrupt ones and keep it clean. Over the years everything fall inline.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Roshan, Mangaluru

    Sun, May 08 2016

    Till the time there is a judicial drama, nothing can change. Every high profile case has one thing in common. Trial Court either convicts or acquits the VIP person. If acquitted highcourt convicts him, if convicted highcourt acquits him. Then the case moves to supreme court, If high court convicted the person, SC rejects and acquits him. If High court acquitted the person, it convicts him, with a lighter punishment. In the process it would take 10-12years. Question is with the same element of evidences how can 3 courts give 3 contradictory judgement.

    Only in the case of common man, superior courts gets tougher and tougher in punishing them.

    This is the first tragedy of justice in India. There is no punishment for Police for negligent probe, nor there is any kind of black marking who consistently give erroneous judgement.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ronald D, Udupi

    Sun, May 08 2016

    Federal Law minister in deep sleep just like coastal MP's!!!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Valerian D'souza, Udupi / Mumbai

    Sun, May 08 2016

    Access to justice is a fundamental rights of everyone.
    Justice delayed to people is justice denied, including appointment of Judges.
    Govt should take quick decision and appoint judges.
    Timely justice delivery system should implemented in our country at any cost, in order to improve law and order,
    Improve business climate, civilization and overall development.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Juliet Mascarenhas, bejai

    Sun, May 08 2016

    Which could not be done in 60 years will be done in ....days and this is the first time....
    Here is an opportunity.Karke dhikao

    DisAgree [1] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Langoolacharya., Belman/Washington,DC.

    Mon, May 09 2016

    Bejaimai,

    Do you have 'Khap Panchayath' in Bejai to solve peoples disputes outside judiciary like in Haryana?

    ...JH...

    DisAgree [7] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev Kumar, Suratkal

    Sun, May 08 2016

    70,000 judges is very less. Better take 200,000. See that all cases are handled propperly within six month's period. Many times I had seen during various court visit..dates of all the cases forwarded with consent of both the parties..giving one or other reason. If things go on solved quickly do we have sufficient prisons to accomodate them.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joe Britto, Nakre/Bangalore

    Sun, May 08 2016

    It's unfortunate state of affairs as so many cases are pending . Justice delayed is indeed justice denied. Filling up 70,000 posts of Judges is more than a monumental task. Mind you each of these vacancies are specialized and cannot be just filled up for the sake of the vacancy. Yes computerization and digitization will certainly help and in India both these should be easily facilitated .We hope Mr Jossey Saldanha's suggestions will be considered seriously and will be implemented as well.

    DisAgree Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sun, May 08 2016

    Our entire Judaical system can be computerized. I have already submitted 'How to do it' once.
    This will be a big boost to Narendra Modi's DIGITAL INDIA ...

    DisAgree [8] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Langoolacharya., Belman/Washington,DC.

    Sun, May 08 2016

    Sir Jossey,

    If we restrict appeals to just one appeal...and make judges to work 8-10 hours and curtail judges vacation to 2 weeks per year...we don't need any more judges...

    We need a law minister having backbone...not like Saddu and Moily...unfit even to become 'Gumasta' in a court...

    ...JH...

    ...JH...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sumit shanbhog, Manipal

    Sun, May 08 2016


    Jossey,


    I am sure Modi's RAM must have crashed after seeing your digital proposal..lol

    DisAgree [6] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: We require more than 70,000 judges to clear pending cases: CJI



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.