Supreme Court to start final hearing of Ayodhya dispute from December 5


New Delhi, Aug 11 (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday decided to hold the final hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute from December 5 and made it clear that no adjournment shall be given in any circumstance.

The apex court, after an intense deliberation for more than one-and-half-hours, reached a consensus on commencement of the hearing on the cross-appeals filed against the 2010 judgement of the Allahabad High Court.

The high court had ruled a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acre area at Ayodhya among the parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Ram Lalla.

A specially constituted bench, headed by Justice Dipak Misra, asked the contesting parties to complete the translation of the exhibits of the documents likely to be relied upon into English within 12 weeks since these were in eight different languages.

The bench, also comprising justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer, asked the Uttar Pradesh government to complete within 10 weeks the translation of the evidence recorded for adjudication of the title dispute in the high court into English.

The bench made it clear that the parties would have to strictly adhere to the time frame fixed by it and no adjournment shall be given in any circumstances.

Senior counsel CS Vaidyanathan, appearing for Lord Ram Lalla and Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the UP government, pressed for early hearing of the matter, but senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Anoop George

Chaudhari and Rajeev Dhavan, representing other parties, were not in favour of commencement of the hearing before January next year.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 12 2017

    God is not homeless if he doesn't have a house nor he will wonder around in search of home.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D, QC, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Fri, Aug 11 2017

    All the warring parties to this long standing and divisive dispute should settle it amicably and offer a compromise to the SC. That is not unusual. Muslims and Jews have a temple and a mosque in the same structure, one behind the other, and despite occasional skirmishes that has survived for centuries. Similarly, I remember in days of yore, when I lived in Mumbai (old Bombay) there was a three-sided structure in the middle of the road in Dadar, where each of the three major religious communities (Hindus, Muslims and Christians) could pray on the side designated to them. I would urge the parties to have a mosque facing Mecca on one end of the 2.7 acre land and on the opposite side, facing the Himalayas or the birthplace of Rama, a temple for the Hindus, and partition the land accordingly without barriers, with appropriate access to enter the place of worship.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • MILAN, LUCERNE

    Fri, Aug 11 2017

    WE ARE IN PEACE NOW.. WE DONT WANT ANY RESOLUTIONS.. WE DONT WANT TERRORIST ATTACKS..

    THESE POLTICIANS HAVE NO PROBLEMS THEY SIT IN BUNGLOW WITH ZERO SECURITY.. COMMON MAN HAS TO SUFFER

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Santan Mascarenhas, Kinnigoli/Mumbai

    Fri, Aug 11 2017

    Because we all live and share this planet earth, we have to learn to live in harmony and peace with each other and nature. Hope, the Ayodhya matter is resolved soon and a feeling of brotherhood and trust will be there among us.

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Fri, Aug 11 2017

    Mosques can be built anywhere. But the culprits must be punished.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Aug 11 2017

    Just resolve this matter once & for all ...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Supreme Court to start final hearing of Ayodhya dispute from December 5



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.