Mangaluru: HC refuses to close stone pelting case at IT office in city


Daijiworld Media Network - Mangaluru (SP)

Mangaluru, Jan 30: The state high court (HC) has refused to entertain a request to drop investigation into a case relating to pelting of stones at the office of income tax (IT) department at Attavar here. The stones were pelted by protesters who were out to register their anger against IT raid on properties belonging to minister, D K Shivakumar.

The division bench of the HC presided over by Justice K N Phaneendra, which heard a writ petition filed by Congress activist, A C Vinay Raj, seeking to withdraw the first information report filed against him, passed the said order on Monday January 29. 

Presenting arguments on behalf of the government, advocates said that prohibitory orders were in force in the city on the day of the incident. "In spite of the prohibitory orders in force, purposefully a protest was held in front of the IT office. By pelting stones and vandalizing the place, the concerned caused loss to government property," they said, and sought the HC not to entertain the petition.

The division bench, which heard arguments and counter arguments, came to the conclusion that it would not be possible to close the case at this juncture. After ordering the investigation in the case to continue, it dismissed the writ petition moved by Vinay Raj.

On August 2 last year, IT officials had simultaneously raided several properties and offices belonging to D K Shivakumar and his family members in the city and elsewhere. Branding this raid as having been part of sinister moves by the central government backed by political motives, over 40 Congress activists had come together near the IT office at Attavar where a protest was held. Stones were thrown at the IT office in which window glasses of the office were shattered.

Police personnel of the city (north) station had registered suo motu case against the protesters and registered first information report under several sections of Indian Penal Code like 143 and 147, and took up investigation. Vinay Raj has been named as one of the accused in the case.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • D.P.Shetty, Bahrain

    Tue, Jan 30 2018

    This chaddi less waiting opportunity recent govt plan to drop cases in karnataka ,best punishment given,so that next time they afraid of walking in front of IT office

    DisAgree [3] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • ABD, LOS ANGELES

    Tue, Jan 30 2018

    GOONDA CORPORATOR AUGUSTINE CHRISTOPHER(A.C) VINAYARAJ MUST BE SEVERELY PUNISHED FOR PELTING STONE ON I.T OFFICE

    DisAgree [3] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Mulki

    Tue, Jan 30 2018

    People who take law in their hands should realize the power of law.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • k b r, Mangala Uru

    Tue, Jan 30 2018

    "tax ಕಳ್ಳರ ರಕ್ಷಣಾ ವೇದಿಕೆ"

    DisAgree [4] Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sachin Shetty, Mangalore

    Tue, Jan 30 2018

    Let this be a lesson to all parties..put them behind bars for 6 months...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [40] Reply Report Abuse

  • VJrules, Mangalore

    Tue, Jan 30 2018

    Very good decision by the Honourable High Court! These goons need to be taught a lesson. Vandalising public property just to appease their bosses for own political gains is not acceptable. They need to be put behind bars and be ripped off all the positions they enjoy.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [57] Reply Report Abuse

  • bala, urwa

    Tue, Jan 30 2018

    This man should have been in the jail for his un doings.His brother was on the run for some issues one or two years back.
    Goondaism cannot be tolerated by any one.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [41] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Mangaluru: HC refuses to close stone pelting case at IT office in city



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.